Advertisement

British Politics

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 183–203 | Cite as

Reconciling Two Conflicting Tales of the English Health Policy Process Since 1997

  • Arturo Alvarez-Rosete
  • Nicholas Mays
Article

Abstract

This article identifies and investigates the two seemingly conflicting tales that characterise the English health policy process at the national level since 1997. The first tale points to a high degree of central political control over the initiation and development of policy, and the maintenance of the system of strong central government, traditionally referred to as the ‘Westminster and Whitehall model’. The second tale describes a system of ‘network governance’, suggesting a more complex health policy process in which central government (in particular, the Department of Health as its agent) is weaker than before and no longer holds a monopoly over the health policy-making process. The paper reviews the limited empirical evidence on the English health policy process since 1997 to determine which of the two narratives more accurately captures the nature of it at the national level. It concludes that, while many of the trends noted by the ‘from-government-to-governance’ thesis are evident in the case of health policy, the process has been less affected than other areas of public policy by the appearance of new actors, the move to new institutional arenas and the transformation of relationships. Rather than one of the tales being right and the other wrong, as the literature in this area tends to suggest, it is more accurate to describe the current situation as marked by the simultaneous presence of different modes of policy-making — both ‘command-and-control’ as well as a more inclusive, complex set of mechanisms. Indeed, top-down coordination and control of the policy process may be seen as a response to the greater practical difficulties facing the ‘core executive’ in managing policy processes that involve an increased number of influential actors.

Keywords

health policy NHS Westminster and Whitehall model governance policy process policy formulation policy implementation core executive 

References

  1. Allsop, J., Baggott, R. and Jones, K. (2002) ‘Health Consumer Groups And The National Policy Process’, in R. Saras and A. Petersen (eds.) Consuming Health: the Commodification of Health Care, London: Routledge, pp. 48–65.Google Scholar
  2. Allsop, J., Jones, K. and Baggott, R. (2004) ‘Health consumer groups in the UK: a new social movement?’, Sociology of Health and Illness 26 (6): 737–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez-Rosete, A. (2004) ‘Nigel gets nimble at health’, Public (September): 15–18.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez-Rosete, A. (2005a) ‘Putting staff at the heart of strategy making’, Public (June): 13–14.Google Scholar
  5. Alvarez-Rosete, A. (2005b) ‘Testing Toke and Marsh's dialectical approach: the evolution of the policy community in generic medicines’, Unpublished.Google Scholar
  6. Alvarez-Rosete, A. (2007) ‘Modernising Health Policy-making’, in A. Hann (ed.) Health Policy and Politics, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
  7. Appleby, J. and Harrison, A. (2005) The War on Waiting for Hospital Treatment, London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
  8. Baggott, R. (1997) ‘Evaluating health care reform: the case of the NHS internal market’, Public Administration 75: 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baggott, R. (2000) Public Health, Politics and Policy, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Baggott, R. (2007) Understanding Health Policy, Bristol: The Policy Press.Google Scholar
  11. Baggott, R., Allsop, J. and Jones, K. (2004a) Speaking for Patients and Carers: Health Consumer Groups and the Policy Process, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Baggott, R., Allsop, J. and Jones, K. (2004b) ‘Representing the repressed? Health consumer groups and the national policy press’, Policy and Politics 32 (3): 317–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics, Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bevan, G. (2006) ‘A third way’, British Medical Journal 333 (7561): 252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2006) ‘Prime ministers, presidentialism and Westminster smokescreens’, Political Studies 54 (4): 671–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burns, H. (2004) ‘Health tsars’, British Medical Journal 328 (7432): 117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cabinet Office. (2007) DH Capability Review, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  18. Cairney, P. (2007) ‘A “multiple lenses” approach to policy change: the case of tobacco policy in the UK’, British Politics 2: 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen, D., March, J. and Olsen, J. (1972) ‘A garbage can model of organizational choice’, Administrative Science 17: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cooksey, D. (2006) A Review of UK Health Research Funding, London: HM Treasury.Google Scholar
  21. Cowley, P. (2003) ‘Divide and conquer: how the government got its way on foundation hospitals. Short briefing note, available online (24 November 2003).Google Scholar
  22. Cowley, P. (2006) ‘Making Parliament Matter?’, in P. Dunleavy, R. Heffernan and P. Cowley (eds.) Developments in British Politics 8, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Davidson, R., Hunt, K. and Kitzinger, J. (2003) ‘Radical blueprint for social change? Media representations of New Labour's policies on public health’, Sociology of Health and Illness 25 (6): 532–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Deakin, N. and Parry, R. (2000) ‘The Treasury and Social Policy’, in R.A.W. Rhodes (ed.) Transforming British Government, Vol. 2: Changing Roles and Relationships, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Department of Health. (2001) Shifting the Balance of Power Within the NHS. Securing Delivery, London: DH.Google Scholar
  26. Department of Health. (2005) Commissioning a Patient-led NHS, London: DH.Google Scholar
  27. Department of Health. (2006) Best Research for Best Health. A New National Health Research Strategy, London: DH.Google Scholar
  28. Dixon, A. and Alvarez-Rosete, A. (2008) Governing the NHS, London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
  29. Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (2000) ‘Learning from abroad: the role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making’, Governance 13 (1): 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Edwards, B. and Fall, M. (2005) The Executive Years of the NHS. The England Account 1985–2003, London: The Nuffield Trust and Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Exworthy, M., Berney, L. and Powell, M. (2002) ‘How great expectations in Westminster may be dashed locally: the local implementation of national policy on health inequalities’, Policy and Politics 30 (1): 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Exworthy, M. and Powell, M. (2004) ‘Big windows and little windows: implementation in the “congested state”’, Public Administration 82 (2): 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Flinders, M. (2002) ‘Governance in Whitehall’, Public Administration 80 (1): 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Greener, I. (2004a) ‘Health service organisation in the UK: a political economy approach’, Public Administration 82 (3): 657–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Greener, I. (2004b) ‘The three moments of New Labour's health policy discourse’, Policy and Politics 32 (3): 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Greer, S. (2004) Four Way Bet: How Devolution has led to Four Different Models for the NHS, London: The Constitution Unit.Google Scholar
  37. Greer, S. (2005) ‘Why Do Good Politics Make Bad Health Policy?’, in S. Dawson and C. Sausman (eds.) Future Health Organisations and Systems, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Greer, S. (2006a) ‘The Politics of Health-policy Divergence’, in J. Adams and K. Schmuecker (eds.) Devolution in Practice. Public Policy Differences within the UK, London: IPPR.Google Scholar
  39. Greer, S. (2006b) ‘Uninvited Europeanization: neofunctionalism and the EU in health policy’, Journal of European Public Policy 13 (1): 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Greer, S. (2006c) Responding to Europe. Government, NHS and Stakeholder Responses to the EU Health Policy Challenge, London: The Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
  41. Greer, S.L. and Jarman, H. (2007) The Department of Health and the Civil Service: From Whitehall to Department of Delivery to Where?, London: The Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
  42. Hacker, J.S. (2004) ‘Dismantling the health care state? Political institutions, public policies and the comparative politics of health reform’, British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 693–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hall, P.A. (1992) ‘The Movement from Keynesianism to Monetarism: Institutional Analysis and British Economic Policy in the 1970s’, in S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (eds.) Structuring Politics. Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hall, P.A. (1997) ‘The Role of Interests, Institutions and Ideas in the Comparative Political Economy of the Industrialized Nations’, in M.I. Lichbach and A.S. Zuckerman (eds.) Comparative Politics. Rationality, Culture and Structure, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Ham, C. (1999) ‘The third way in health care reform: does the emperor have any clothes?’, Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 4: 168–173.Google Scholar
  46. Ham, C. (2004) Health Policy in Britain: The Politics and Organisation of the National Health Service, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  47. Harrison, S. (2001) ‘Reforming the Medical Profession in the United Kingdom, 1989–1997: Structural Interests in Health Care’, in M. Bovens, P. Hart and B.G. Peters (eds.) Success And Failure In Public Governance. A Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  48. Hood, C. (1991) ‘A public management for all seasons’, Public Administration 69 (1): 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hoque, K., Davis, S. and Humphreys, M. (2004) ‘Freedom to do what you are told: senior management team autonomy in an NHS acute trust’, Public Administration 82 (2): 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. House of Commons Health Select Committee (HSC). (2006) Changes to Primary Care Trusts, HC 646, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  51. Immergut, E.M. (1992) ‘The Rules of the Game: The Logic of Health Policy-making in France, Switzerland, and Sweden’, in S. Steinmo, K. Thelen and F. Longstreth (eds.) Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Jervis, P. and Plowden, W. (2003) The Impact of Political Devolution on the UK's Health Services, London: The Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
  53. John, P. (1998) Analysing Public Policy, London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  54. Jones, H. (2005) ‘Health Policy’, in P. Dorey (ed.) Developments in British Public Policy, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  55. Jones, K., Baggott, R. and Allsop, J. (2004) ‘Influencing the national policy process: the role of consumer health groups’, Health Expectations 7 (1): 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kingdon, J.W. (1984) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, Boston and Toronto: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  57. King's Fund. (2002) The Future of the NHS. A Framework for Debate, London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
  58. King's Fund. (2005) Nice and Herceptin. Policy Position, London: King's Fund.Google Scholar
  59. Klein, R. (2006) The New Politics of the NHS: From Creation to Reinvention, Oxford: Radcliffe Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Kümpers, S., Raak, A.V., Hardy, B. and Mur, I. (2002) ‘The influence of institutions and culture on health policies: different approaches to integrated care in England and the Netherlands’, Public Administration 80 (2): 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Larsen, T.P., Taylor-Gooby, P. and Kananen, J. (2006) ‘New Labour's policy style: a mix of policy approaches’, Journal of Social Policy 35 (4): 629–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  63. McKee, M. (2005) ‘European health policy: where now?’, European Journal of Public Health 15 (6): 557–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morrell, K. (2006) ‘Policy as narrative: New Labour's reform of the National Health Service’, Public Administration 84 (2): 367–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Newman, J. (2001) Modernising Governance. New Labour, Policy and Society, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  66. O’Neill, M.A. (1998) ‘Entrenched interests and exogenous change: doctors, the state and policy change in Canada and the United Kingdom’, Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 36 (1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Orr, D. (2007) ‘The NHS is suffering from reform fatigue’, The Independent, 5 December.Google Scholar
  68. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government. How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  69. Parry, R. (2002) ‘Delivery structures and policy development in post-devolution Scotland’, Social Policy and Society 1 (4): 315–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Paton, C. (2006) New Labour's State of Health. Political Economy, Public Policy and the NHS, Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  71. Pierre, J. and Peters, B.G. (2000) Governance, Politics and the State, Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  72. Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003) ‘What is New About Governance and Why Does it Matter?’, in J. Hayward and A. Menon (eds.) Governing Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Rhodes, R.A.W. and Dunleavy, P. (1995) Prime Minister, Cabinet and Core Executive, Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Richards, D. and Smith, M.J. (2002) Governance and Public Policy in the UK, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Rose, D. (2007) ‘We will free the NHS from Whitehall control, say Tories’, TimesOnline, 21 June.Google Scholar
  77. Ruane, S. (2005) ‘The Future of Healthcare in the UK: Think-Tanks and Their Policy Prescriptions’, in M. Powell, L. Bauld and K. Clarke (eds.) Social Policy Review 17, Bristol: The Policy Press and the Social Policy Association.Google Scholar
  78. Salter, B. (2002) ‘Medical regulation: new politics and old power structures’, Politics 22 (2): 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Salter, B. (2003) ‘Patients and doctors: reformulating the UK health policy community?’, Social Science and Medicine 57 (5): 927–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Salter, B. (2007) ‘Governing UK medical performance: a struggle for policy dominance’, Health Policy 82 (3): 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Salter, B. and Jones, M. (2006) ‘Change in the policy community of human genetics: a pragmatic approach to open governance’, Policy and Politics 34 (2): 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Secretary of State for Health. (1997) The New NHS. Modern. Dependable, Cm 3807, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  83. Secretary of State for Health. (2000) The NHS Plan: A Plan for Investment, A Plan for Reform, Cm 4818-I, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  84. Secretary of State for Health. (2002) Delivering the NHS Plan. Next Steps on Investment, Next Steps on Reform, Cm 5503, London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  85. Sheldrick, B.M. (2003) ‘Judicial review and the allocation of health care resources in Canada and the United Kingdom’, Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, Research and Practice 5 (2–3): 149–166.Google Scholar
  86. Skelcher, C. (2000) ‘Changing images of the state: overloaded, hollow-out, congested’, Public Policy and Administration 15: 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Smee, C. (2005) Speaking Truth to Power: Two Decades of Analysis in the Department of Health, Oxford: Radcliffe/Nuffield Trust.Google Scholar
  88. Stevens, S. (2004) ‘Reform strategies for the English NHS’, Health Affairs 23 (3): 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wood, B. (2000) Patient Power? The Politics of Patients’ Associations in Britain and America, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arturo Alvarez-Rosete
    • 1
  • Nicholas Mays
    • 2
  1. 1.King's Fund, 11–13 Cavendish SquareLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Public Health and PolicyHealth Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineLondonUK

Personalised recommendations