Journal of Brand Management

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 396–407 | Cite as

The added value of contextual motivations on consumer–brand relationships of self-gifts

Original Article

Abstract

Consumers frequently engage in self-gifting purchases (gifts for one’s self) and they do so mostly to reward themselves for a success achieved or to cheer themselves up after a failure. Thus, both ‘reward’ and ‘compensation’ motives might underlie consumers’ self-gift purchases. Although self-gifting has been increasingly popular in the marketing literature, not much work has investigated its consequences. In the current article, we seek to examine how these motives to purchase self-gifts might influence the consumer–brand relationship. Across two studies, using both manipulated and measured variables, we show that consumers have more positive brand evaluations when motives are present than when they are absent, independent of whether the product is purchased because of a self-rewarding or a self-compensating motive. Furthermore, we show that this effect holds true only for individuals who do not feel very connected to the brand. Results are robust across very different product categories (lollipops and watches) and populations (student and ‘non-student’ sample). Thus, we suggest that marketers might target consumers with low self-brand connection more effectively by emphasizing specific motivations to purchase indulgent self-gifts when they design their ad campaigns and brand positioning strategies.

Keywords

contextual motivations self-brand connection consumer–brand relationships self-gifts reward compensatory 

References

  1. Aiken, L. and West, S.G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Atalay, A.S. and Meloy, M.G. (2006) When the going gets tough, the tough go shopping: An examination of self-gifting behavior. In: C. Pechmann and L. Price (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 33, San Antonio, TX: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 259–260.Google Scholar
  3. Atalay, A.S. and Meloy, M.G. (2011) Retail therapy: A strategic effort to improve mood. Psychology and Marketing 28 (6): 638–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belk, R. (1979) Gift-gifting behavior. In: J.N. Sheth (ed.) Research in Marketing. Vol. 2, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 95–126.Google Scholar
  5. Belk, R. (1988) Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Escalas, J.E. (2004) Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14 (1–2): 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Escalas, J.E. and Bettman, J. (2003) You are what they eat: The influence of reference groups on consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13 (3): 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Escalas, J.E. and Bettman, J. (2009) Self-brand connections: The role of reference groups and celebrity endorsers in the creation of brand meaning. In: D.J. MacInnis, C.W. Park and J.R. Priester (eds.) Handbook of Brand Relationships. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, pp. 107–123.Google Scholar
  9. Faure, C. and Mick, D.G. (1993) Self-gifts through the lens of attribution theory. In: L. McAlister and M.L. Rothschild (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 20, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 553–556.Google Scholar
  10. Fitzsimons, G. et al. (2002) Non-conscious influences on consumer choice. Marketing Letters 13 (3): 267–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fitzsimons, G. (2008) Death to dichotomizing. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (1): 5–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibson, B. (2008) Can evaluative conditioning change attitudes toward mature brands? New evidence from the implicit association test. Journal of Consumer Research 35 (1): 178–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hayes, A.F. (2013) An Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Heath, M.T., Tynan, C. and Ennew, C.T. (2011) Self-gift giving: Understanding consumers and exploring brand messages. Journal of Marketing Communications 17 (2): 127–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hudders, L. (2012) Why the devil wears Prada: Consumers’ purchase motives for luxuries. Journal of Brand Management 19 (7): 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kivetz, R. and Simonson, I. (2002) Self-control for the righteous: Toward a theory of precommitment to indulgence. Journal of Consumer Research 29 (2): 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kivetz, R. and Zheng, Y. (2006) Determinants of justification and self-control. Journal of Experimental Psychology 135 (4): 572–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luomala, H.T. (1998) A mood-alleviative perspective on self-gift behaviours: Stimulating consumer behaviour theory development. Journal of Marketing Management 14 (1): 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Luomala, H.T. and Laaksonen, M. (1999) A qualitative exploration of mood-regulatory self-gift behaviors. Journal of Economic Psychology 20 (2): 147–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCracken, G. (1989) Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research 16 (3): 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKeage, K.K.R., Richins, M.L. and Debevec, K. (1993) Self-gifts and the manifestation of material values. In: L. McAlister and M.L. Rothschild (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 20, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 359–364.Google Scholar
  22. Mick, D.G. (1996) Self-gifts. In: C. Otnes and R.F. Beltramini (eds.) Gift Giving: A Research Anthology. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University, pp. 99–120.Google Scholar
  23. Mick, D.G. and Demoss, M. (1990a) To me from me: A descriptive phenomenology of self-gifts. In: R. Pollay, G. Gorn and M. Goldberg (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 17, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 677–682.Google Scholar
  24. Mick, D.G. and Demoss, M. (1990b) Self-gifts: Phenomenological insights from four contexts. Journal of Consumer Research 17 (3): 322–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mick, D.G. and Demoss, M. (1992) Further findings on self-gifts: Products, qualities, and socioeconomic correlates. In: J.F. Sherry Jr. and B. Sternthal (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 19, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 140–146.Google Scholar
  26. Mogilner, C. and Aaker, J. (2009) The time versus money effect: Shifting product attitudes and decisions through personal connection. Journal of Consumer Research 36 (2): 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poels, K. and Dewitte, S. (2006) How to capture the heart? Reviewing 20 years of emotion measurement in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 46 (1): 18–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Spiller, S.A., Fitzsimons, G.J., Lynch Jr. J.G. and McClelland, G.M. (2013) Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research 50 (2): 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tice, D.M., Bratslavsky, E. and Baumeister, R.F. (2001) Emotional distress regulation takes precedence over impulse control: If you feel bad, do it! Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (1): 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wolfinbarger, M.F. (1990) Motivations and symbolism in gift-giving behavior. In: R. Pollay, G. Gorn and M. Goldberg (eds.) Advances in Consumer Research. Vol. 17, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 699–706.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marina Carnevale
    • 1
  • Ozge Yucel-Aybat
    • 1
  • Lauren Block
    • 1
  1. 1.Schools of Business, Fordham UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations