Is luxury compatible with sustainability? Luxury consumers’ viewpoint
- 1.1k Downloads
The luxury sector thus far has received scant attention from sustainable development activists and watchgroups. Yet, this focus is changing. Even if other sectors may be more relevant to the cause of sustainability, luxury brands that have gained intact reputations for sustainability must take care to maintain it. Therefore, the present research investigates the level of sensitivity of actual luxury buyers to the cause of sustainable development, insofar as it concerns the luxury sector, luxury brands and their purchases. Do consumers’ attitudes towards sustainability spill over to their opinions about the sustainability of luxury itself, or is luxury a world apart? The findings show that luxury buyers have ambivalent attitudes, such that they consider luxury and sustainability somewhat contradictory, especially with regard to the social and economic harmony facet of sustainable development.
Keywordsluxury sustainable development ethics CSR ecology
The authors acknowledge funding and support from the Pernod Ricard Company.
- Bain and Co. (2012) Luxury Goods Worldwide Market Study 2012. Milan: Altagamma.Google Scholar
- Brundtland Report (1987) Our Common Future. New York: United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development.Google Scholar
- Chadha, R. and Husband, P. (2007) The Cult of Luxury: Asia’s Love Affair with Luxury. London: Nicholas Brealey.Google Scholar
- De Barnier, V., Rodina, I. and Valette-Florence, P. (2006) Which luxury perceptions affect most consumer purchase behavior? A cross cultural exploratory study in France, the United Kingdom and Russia. Congrés Paris-Venise des Tendences Marketing, Paris. http://www.escp-eap.net/conferences/marketing/2006_cp/Materiali/Paper-/Fr/DeBarnier_Rodina_ValetteFlorence.pdf, pp 1–27.Google Scholar
- DeBeers (2009) Luxury: Considered. London: Ledbury Research.Google Scholar
- Dubois, B., Laurent, G. and Czellar, S. (2001) Consumer rapport to luxury: Analyzing complex and ambivalent attitudes. Working Paper Series: CR 736/2001, Paris, France: HEC.Google Scholar
- Esty, D.C. and Winston, A.S. (2007) Green to Gold: How Smart Companies use Environmental Strategy to Innovate, Create Value, and Build Competitive Advantage. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
- Johnson, R.L. (2009) Organizational motivations for going green or profitability versus sustainability. The Business Review 13 (1): 22–28.Google Scholar
- Jones, T.M. (1991) Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16 (2): 366–395.Google Scholar
- Kapferer, J.N. (1990) Rumors. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
- Kapferer, J.N. (2010) All that glitters is not green: The challenge of sustainable luxury. European Business Review (November–December): 40–45.Google Scholar
- Kapferer, J.N. (2012b) Why luxury should not delocalize: A critique of a growing tendency. European Business Review (March–April): 58–62.Google Scholar
- Kapferer, J.N. and Bastien, V. (2012) The Luxury Strategy: Break the Rules of Marketing to Build Luxury Brands. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
- Porter, M. and Kramer, M. (2006) Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review 84 (12): 78–92.Google Scholar
- Weller, I. and Walter, S. (2008) Ecology and fashion: Development lines and prospects, www.inter-disciplinary.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/sabwalterpaper.pdf, accessed June 2013.