Journal of Brand Management

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 66–78 | Cite as

To sell or not to sell: Overweight users’ effect on fashion assortments

Original Article
  • 33 Downloads

Abstract

Overweight people claim to be mistreated by the fashion industry. Fashion companies disagree. Despite the controversy, actual research has been scarce. This study compares the sizes of clothes that the four leading mass-marketing fashion retailers in Sweden offer to the body sizes of the population. Although branding theory would support the idea of rejecting fat consumers to improve user imagery for fashion brands, such practices were not evident. The main contribution of this article is that it provides the first quantified empirical evidence on the theory of typical user imagery. In the discussion, it is posited that, although mass-market fashion brands should be susceptible to negative user imagery related to overweight and obese users, the companies avoid such problems by making garments that are not directly attributable to a specific brand, thus mitigating the negative effect of overweight and obese user imagery.

Keywords

brands assortments fashion product and brand management 

References

  1. Aaker, D.A. (1996) Building Strong Brands. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aaker, J.L. (1997) Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (3): 347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aaker, J.L. (1999) The malleable self: The role of self-expression in persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research 36 (1): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Azoulay, A. and Kapferer, J.-N.L. (2003) Do brand personality scales really measure brand personality? Journal of Brand Management 11 (2): 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banister, E.N. and Hogg, M.K. (2004) Negative symbolic consumption and consumers’ drive for self-esteem. European Journal of Marketing 38 (7): 850–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belk, R.W. (1988) Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (2): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bordo, S. (2003) Unbearable Weight: Feminism, Western Culture, and the Body. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bosnjak, M. and Rudolph, N. (2008) Undesired self-image congruence in a low-involvment product context. European Journal of Marketing 42 (5/6): 702–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caprara, G.V., Vecchione, M., Barbaranelli, C. and Fraley, R.C. (2007) When likeness goes with liking: The case of political preference. Political Psychology 28 (5): 609–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohn, L.D. and Adler, N. (1992) Female and male perceptions of ideal body shapes. Psychology of Women Quarterly 16 (1): 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crandall, C.S. (1994) Prejudice against fat people: Ideology and self-interest. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 66 (5): 882–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D'Amato, S. (2005) Fashion's Larger Problem. Washington: The Washington Post.Google Scholar
  13. De Chernatony, L. (2006) From Brand Vision to Brand Evaluation. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Demarest, J. and Allen, R. (2000) Body image: Gender, ethnic, and age differences. Journal of Social Psychology 140 (4): 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolliver, M. (2005) Sizing up women's attitudes toward their weight, whether real or ideal. Adweek 46: 26.Google Scholar
  16. Dressmann.se. (2009) Internationaliseringen av Dressmann, http://www.dressmann.se/index.asp?id=30480.
  17. Ehrstedt, A., Ottosson, J. and Sandelius, P. (2007) Lindex – Företagsidentitet och upplevd image. Marketing Dept., Gothenburg, Gothenburg School of Business, Economics & Law: 57.Google Scholar
  18. Garner, R. (2005) Post-it note persuasion: A sticky influence. Journal of Consumer Psychology 15 (3): 230–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gladwell, M. (2000) The Tipping Point. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.Google Scholar
  20. Johar, J.S. and Sirgy, M.J. (1991) Value-expressive versus utilitarian advertising appeals: When and why to use which appeal. Journal of Advertising 20 (3): 23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Keller, K.L. (2000) The brand report card. Harvard Business Review, (January–February).Google Scholar
  22. Keller, K.L. (2003) Strategic Brand Management – Building, Measuring, and Managing Brand Equity. Upper Saddle River and Prentice Hall, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  23. Kennedy, M. (2007) Kapp-Ahl goes to Hollywood. Göteborgsposten. Göteborg, Sweden, p. 40.Google Scholar
  24. Keys, A. (1955) Obesity and heart disease. Journal of Chronicle Diseases 1: 456–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kressman, F., Sirgy, M.J., Hermann, A., Huber, F. and Lee, D.J. (2006) Direct and indirect effects of self-image congruence on brand loyalty. Journal of Business Research 59 (9): 955–964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kulturhuset Stockholm. (2006) Den förbjudna kroppen. Stockholm, Sweden: Kulturdepartementet.Google Scholar
  27. Larsson, I. (2005) Human body composition. Reference data and anthropometric equations. The metabolic syndrome and risk. Sahlgrenska Academy. Göteborg, Sweden: University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  28. Levy, S.J. (1959) Symbols for sale. Harvard Business Review 37 (4): 117–124.Google Scholar
  29. Malhotra, N.K. (1981) A Scale to measure self concepts, person concepts, and product concepts. Journal of Marketing Research XVIII: 456–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCracken, G. (1986) Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1): 71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCracken, G. (1988) Culture and Consumption – New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  32. McCracken, G. (1989) Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research 16 (3): 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Muth, J.L. and Cash, T.F. (1997) Body-image attitudes: What difference does gender make. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27 (16): 1438–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ogilvie, D.M. (1987) The undesired self: A neglected variable in personality research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (2): 379–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Park, J., Nam, Y., Choi, K.M., Lee, Y. and Lee, K.H. (2009) Apparel consumers’ body type and their shopping characteristics. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management 13 (3): 372–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Philips, J.M. and Drummond, M.J.N. (2001) An investigation into the body image perception, body satisfaction and exercise expectations of male fitness leaders: Implications for professional practice. Leisure Studies 20 (2): 95–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Puhl, R., Andreyeva, T. and Brownell, K.D. (2008) Perceptions of weight discrimination: Prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. International Journal of Obesity, Advance online publication, doi: 10.1038/ijo.2008.22.Google Scholar
  38. Ratchford, B.T. (1987) New insights about the FCB grid. Journal of Advertising Research 27 (4): 24–38.Google Scholar
  39. Resumé. (2010) Lika som bär – reklam för SEKO och Dressman, http://www.resume.se/nyheter/2007/02/13/lika-som-bar-reklam-for-se/index.xml, accessed 16 April 2010.
  40. Ritson, M. (2003) Fashion chains’ savvy strategy to squeeze out larger shoppers. Marketing (00253650): 16.Google Scholar
  41. Rodin, J., Silberstein, L. and Streigel-Moore, R. (1984) Women and weight: A normative discontent. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Nebraska.Google Scholar
  42. Roe, D.A. and Eickwort, K.R. (1976) Relationships between obesity and associated health factors with unemployment among low income women. Journal of American Medical Women's Association 31: 193–204.Google Scholar
  43. Schroeder, J. (2006) PhD Course: Visual Issues in Marketing, Management, and Consumer Research. Gothenburg, Sweden.Google Scholar
  44. Secord, P.F. and Jourard, S.M. (1953) The appraisal of body-cathexis: body-cathexis and the self. Journal of Consulting Psychology 17 (5): 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Shim, S., Kotsiopulos, A. and Knoll, D.S. (1991) Body cathexis, clothing attitude, and their relations to clothing and shopping behavior among male consumers. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal 9 (35): 35–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sirgy, M.J. (1982) Self concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of Consumer Research 9: 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sirgy, M.J. and Coskun Samli, A. (1985) A path analytic model of store loyalty involving self-concept, store image, geographic loyalty, and socioeconomic status. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 13 (3): 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Statistics Sweden. (2009) Tabell HA 13. Överviktiga eller feta. Statistics Sweden.Google Scholar
  49. Wadman (2007) Interview with the Swedish National Institute of Public Health. Göteborg.Google Scholar
  50. WHO (1997) WHO Consultation on Obesity. Geneva.Google Scholar
  51. Wooley, S.C. and Wooley, O.W. (1979) Obesity and women – I: A closer look at the facts. Women's Studies International Quarterly 2: 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zierath, J. (2006) Typ 2-diabetes och fetma ökar konstant i västvärlden. KI-Bladet (4): 8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MarketingSchool of Business, Economics, and Law, Göteborg UniversityGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations