Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Key determinants of internal brand management success: An exploratory empirical analysis

  • 705 Accesses

  • 139 Citations

Abstract

This paper presents explorative, empirical data as a first step towards testing the holistic model of internal brand management previously developed by the authors. Based on the premise of identity-oriented branding, the authors statistically examine the factors behind the three key concepts of their internal brand management model: brand commitment, brand citizenship behaviour and the brand–customer relationship. The empirical analysis builds on three data sets examining six industry sectors. The three samples were generated by means of surveys of customers, employees and marketing professionals responsible for internal brand management. The results of the statistical analysis reveal the extent to which the hypothesised determinants and causal links between brand commitment, brand citizenship behaviour and brand strength (defined as the degree of behavioural relevance of the brand) hold: The hypothesised causal link between brand commitment and brand citizenship behaviour was empirically validated, whereas the purported relationship between brand citizenship behaviour and brand strength could be shown in tendency. Its causal link could not conclusively be proven as the size of the sample proved to be too small. The hypothesised constituents of brand commitment and brand citizenship behaviour, however, required substantial modification on the basis of the empirical evidence and hence require further empirical testing with a new data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

References

  1. Aaker, D. A. (1996) ‘Building Strong Brands’, Simon & Schuster, New York, p. 69ff.

  2. Kapferer, J. -N. (1992) ‘Die Marke—Kapital des Unternehmens’, Moderne Industrie, Landsberg/Lech.

  3. Keller, K. L. (1992) ‘Managing brands for the long run: Brand reinforcement and revitalization strategies’, California Management Review, Vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 102–124.

  4. Meffert, H. and Burmann, C. (2002) ‘Theoretisches Grundkonzept der identitätsorientierten Markenführung’, in Meffert, H., Burmann, C. and Koers, M. (eds) ‘Markenmanagement: Grundfragen der identitätsorientierten Markenführung’, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, pp. 35–72.

  5. Aaker, D. A. (1996) ‘Building Strong Brands’, Simon & Schuster, New York, p. 175ff.

  6. Brexendorf, T. O. and Tomczak, T. (2004) ‘Interne Markenführung’, in Albers, S., Tomczak, T. and Hassmann, V. (eds) ‘Verkauf—Kundenmanagement, Vertriebssteuerung, E-Commerce, Digitale Fachbibliothek, Sektion 03.15 Personal und Führung’, Symposion, Düsseldorf.

  7. Wittke-Kothe, C. (2001) ‘Interne Markenführung: Verankerung der Markenidentität im Mitarbeiterverhalten’, Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden.

  8. Vallaster, C. and de Chernatony, L. (2005) ‘Internationalisation of service brands: The role of leadership during the internal brand building process’, Journal of Marketing Management, Vol. 21, No. 1/2, pp. 181–203.

  9. Burmann, C. and Zeplin, S. (2005) ‘Building brand commitment: A behavioural approach to internal brand management’, Journal of Brand Management, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 279–300.

  10. Selnes, F. (1998) ‘Antecedents and consequences of trust and satisfaction in buyer–seller relationships’, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 32, No. 3/4, p. 305.

  11. Müller, S. and Wünschmann, S. (2004) ‘Markenvertrauen :Aktueller Stand der Forschung und empirische Untersuchung am Beispiel der Automobilbranche’, ARbeitspapier, Lehrstuhl für Marketing der TU Dresden.

  12. Aaker, J. L. (1997) ‘Dimensions of brand personality’, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 34 (August) pp. 347–356.

  13. Bortz, J. (1999) ‘Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler’, 5th edn, Springer-Verlag GMBH, Berlin.

  14. Scheffler, H. (2000) ‘Stichprobenbildung und Datenerhebung’, in Herrmann, A. and Homburg, C. (eds) ‘Marktforschung: Methoden, Anwendungen, Praxisbeispiele’, 2nd edn, Dr Th Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden.

  15. Boomsma, A. (1983) ‘On the robustness of LISREL (maximum likelihood estimation) against small sample size and non-normality’, Rijkuniversiteit, Groningen.

  16. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1992) ‘Multivariate Analysis with Readings’, 3rd edn, Macmillan, New York, p. 444.

  17. MCA Communicates. (1999) ‘The Brand Ambassador Benchmark: A Survey of Staff Attitudes and Behaviours and their Impact on Customer Loyalty’, Management Consultancies Association, London.

  18. Peccei, R. and Rosenthal, P. (2001) ‘Delivering customer oriented behaviour through empowerment: An empirical test of HRM assumptions’, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 38, No. 6, pp. 831–857.

  19. Chaudhury, A. and Holbrook, M. B. (2001) ‘The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65, No. 2, p. 81.

  20. Delgado-Ballester, E. (2004) ‘Applicability of a brand trust scale across product categories’, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38, No. 5/6, pp. 573–592.

  21. Delgado-Ballester, E. and Munuera-Aleman, J. L. (2001) ‘Brand trust in the context of consumer loyalty’, European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 35, No. 11/12, p. 1238.

  22. Garbarino, E. and Johnson, M. S. (1999) ‘The different roles of satisfaction, trust and commitment in consumer relationships’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 70–87.

  23. Hess, J. S. (1995) ‘Construction and assessment of a scale to measure consumer trust’, in Stern, B.B. (ed.) ‘Enhancing Knowledge Development in Marketing’, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, Vol. 6, pp. 20–38.

  24. Morgan, R. M. and Hunt, S. D. (1994) ‘The commitment–trust theory of relationship marketing’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, pp. 20–38.

  25. Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J. and Sabol, B. (2002) ‘Consumer trust, value and loyalty in relational exchanges’, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No. 1, pp. 15–37.

  26. Nguyen, N. and Leblanc, G. (2002) ‘Contact personnel, physical environment and the perceived corporate image of intangible services by new clients’, International Journal of Service Industry Management, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 242–262.

  27. Bortz, J. (1999) ‘Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler’, 5th edn, Springer-Verlag GMBH, Berlin, p. 449.

  28. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1992) ‘Multivariate Analysis with Readings’, 3rd edn, Macmillan, New York, p. 46.

  29. For further details of the statistical analysis on this point, see Zeplin, S. (2006) ‘Innengerichtetes identitätsbasiertes Markenmanagement’, Gabler Edition, Wissenschaft, Wiesbaden, p. 223.

  30. Sutton, C. D. and Harrison, A. W. (1993) ‘Validity assessment of compliance, identification, and internalisation’, Educational & Psychological Measurement, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 217–223.

  31. Caldwell, D. F., Chatman, J. A. and O’Reilly, C. A. (1990) ‘Building organizational commitment: A multifirm study’, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 71–93.

  32. Vodafone UK. (17th July, 2006) The full report can be downloaded from www.vodafone.co.uk/workingnation.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Nicola Riley.

Additional information

2works for the Boston Consulting Group in Hamburg, Germany as a senior management consultant. After her Bachelor's and Master's degree at the University of Münster, Germany and Zaragoza, Spain, she completed her doctorate on internal brand management at the Chair for Innovative Brand Management (LiM®), University of Bremen, Germany in 2005.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Burmann, C., Zeplin, S. & Riley, N. Key determinants of internal brand management success: An exploratory empirical analysis. J Brand Manag 16, 264–284 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/bm.2008.6

Download citation

Keywords

  • internal branding
  • brand identity
  • brand commitment
  • brand citizenship behaviour
  • brand–customer relationship
  • brand strength