Journal of Brand Management

, Volume 16, Issue 5–6, pp 395–405 | Cite as

Measuring perceived brand luxury: An evaluation of the BLI scale

  • George Christodoulides
  • Nina Michaelidou
  • Ching Hsing Li
Original Article


This paper investigates the psychometric properties of Vigneron and Johnson's Brand Luxury Index scale. The authors developed the scale using data collected from a student sample in Australia. To validate the scale, the study reported in this paper uses data collected from Taiwanese luxury consumers. The scale was initially subjected to reliability analysis yielding low α values for two of its five proposed dimensions. Exploratory and confirmatory factors analyses were subsequently performed to examine the dimensionality of brand luxury. Discriminant and convergent validity tests highlight the need for further research into the dimensionality of the construct. Although the scale represents a good initial contribution to understanding brand luxury, in view of consumers' emerging shopping patterns, further investigation is warranted to establish the psychometric properties of the scale and its equivalence across cultures.


luxury brands perceptions scale assessment culture replication 

References and Note

  1. Chadha, R. and Husband, P. (2006) The Cult of the Luxury Brand: Inside Asia's Love Affair with Luxury. London: Nicholas Brealy International.Google Scholar
  2. Reuters. (2007) Luxury market growth seen at 8% next 3yrs study, 17 October. Available from, accessed 6 November 2007.
  3. BCG. (2004) Trading Up: Update On Trends, Brands, and Practices – 2004 Research Update, Report.Google Scholar
  4. Vigneron, F. and Johnson, L. W. (2004) Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management 11 (6): 484–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Easley, R. W., Madden, C. S. and Dunn, M. G. (2000) Conducting marketing science: The role of replication in the research process. Journal of Business Research 48: 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hubbard, R. and Armstrong, J. S. (1994) Replication and extensions in marketing: Rarely published but quite contrary. International Journal of Research in Marketing 11: 233–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kocak, A., Abimbola, T. and Ozer, A. (2007) Consumer brand equity in a cross-cultural replication: An evaluation of a scale. Journal of Marketing Management 23 (1): 157–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hunter, J. E. (2001) The desperate need for replications. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenberg, J. (1987) The college sophomore as Guinea Pig: Setting the record straight. The Academy of Management Review 12 (1): 157–159.Google Scholar
  10. Flynn, L. R. and Pearcy, D. (2001) Four subtle sins in scale development: Some suggestions for strengthening the current paradigm. International Journal of Market Research 43 (4): 409–423.Google Scholar
  11. Carmines, E. G. and Zeller, R. A. (1979) Reliability and Validity Assessment. Sage: Beverly Hills, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Anastasi, A. (1986) Psychological testing, 5th edn., Macmillan: New York.Google Scholar
  13. Dubois, B., Czellar, S. and Laurent, G. (2005) Consumer segments based on attitudes toward luxury: Empirical evidence from twenty countries. Marketing Letters 16 (2): 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Veblen, T. B. (1899) The Theory of the Leisure Class. Houghton Mifflin: Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Kemp, S. (1998) Perceiving luxury and necessity. Journal of Economic Psychology 19 (5): 591–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Alleres, D. (1990) Luxe…. Strategies Marketing. Economica: Paris.Google Scholar
  17. Vickers, J. S. and Renand, F. (2003) The marketing of luxury goods: An exploratory study. The Marketing Review 3: 459–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nueno, J. L. and Quelch, J. A. (1998) The mass marketing of luxury. Business Horizons, November–December, pp. 61–68.Google Scholar
  19. Dubois, B., Laurent, G. and Czellar, S. (2001) Consumer Rapport to Luxury: Analyzing Complex and Ambivalent Attitudes. Working paper 736, HEC School of Management, Jouy-en-Josas, France.Google Scholar
  20. Dubois, B. and Paternault, C. (1995) Understanding the world of international luxury brands: The dream formula. Journal of Advertising Research 35 (4): 69–76.Google Scholar
  21. Vigneron, F. and Johnson, L. W. (1999) A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review 3 (1): 15.Google Scholar
  22. Mason, R. (1984) Conspicuous consumption: A literature review. European Journal of Marketing 18 (3): 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynn, M. (1991) Scarcity effects on value: A quantitative review of the commodity theory literature. Psychology and Marketing 8 (1): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O. and Hunter, G. L. (2001) Consumers' need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation. Journal of Consumer Research 28 (1): 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garfein, R. T. (1989) Cross-cultural perspectives on the dynamics of prestige. Journal of Services Marketing 3 (Summer): 17–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirschman, E. C. and Holbrook, M. B. (1982) Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing 46 (Summer): 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dhar, R. and Wertenbroch, K. (2000) Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods. Journal of Marketing Research 37 (February): 60–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Berry, C. J. (1994) The Idea of Luxury: A Conceptual and Historical Investigation. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Belk, R. W. (1988) Possessions and extended self. Journal of Consumer Research 15 (September): 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hair et al, 1998 state that for a sample size >350 factor loadings of 0.30 are statistically significant.Google Scholar
  31. Wells, W. D. (1993) Discovery-oriented consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research 19 (4): 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. James, W. L. and Sonner, B. S. (2001) Just say no to traditional student samples. Journal of Advertising Research 41 (5): 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Burnett, J. J. and Dunne, P. M. (1986) An appraisal of the use of student subjects in marketing research. Journal of Business Research 14 (4): 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sears, D. O. (1986) College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nunnally, J. C. (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn., McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
  36. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. and Black, W. C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis, 5th edn., Prentice-Hall: New Jersey.Google Scholar
  37. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobserved variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Bagozzi, R. P. and Yi, Y. (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 16 (Spring): 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Aaker, J. L., Benet-Martinez, V. and Garolera, J. (2001) Consumption symbols as carriers of culture: A study of Japanese and Spanish brand personality constructs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (3): 492–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCracken, G. (1986) Culture and consumption: A theoretical account of the structure and movement of the cultural meaning of consumer goods. Journal of Consumer Research 13 (1): 71–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Aaker, J. and Maheswaran, D. (1997) The effect of cultural orientation of persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research 24 (3): 315–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kim, H. and Markus, H. R. (1999) Deviance or uniqueness, harmony or conformity? A cultural analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 785–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fiske, A., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R. and Nisbett, R. E. (1998) The Cultural Matrix of Social Psychology. In: D. Gilbert, S. Fiske and G. Lindzey (eds.) The Handbook of Social Psychology, 4th edn., McGraw-Hill: San Francisco, pp. 915–981.Google Scholar
  44. Wong, N. Y. and Ahuvia, A. C. (1998) Personal taste and family face: Luxury consumption in Confucian and Western societies. Psychology & Marketing 15 (5): 423–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45., accessed 4 September 2008.
  46. Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture's Consequences. Sage: Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar
  47. Hofstede, G. (1984) The cultural relativity of the quality of life concept. Academy of Management Review 9 (3): 389–398.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Christodoulides
    • 1
  • Nina Michaelidou
    • 1
  • Ching Hsing Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Birmingham Business School, The University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations