Advertisement

BioSocieties

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 277–295 | Cite as

Detaching data from the state: Biobanking and building Big Data in Sweden

  • Alison Cool
Original Article

Abstract

LifeGene, a biobank and research infrastructure, is Sweden’s largest biomedical project. Designed for research on gene–environment interactions, the project aimed to collect data and biological samples from 500 000 individuals. The directors pointed to Sweden’s universal health-care system, national registries and pro-science citizenry as indicative of the nation’s unique suitability for this ambitious project. As researchers explained, in Sweden, large-scale national collection of personal data has generally proceeded with little debate. In this view, the historical legacy of social engineering and close ties between science and the state has led to a popular sense of trust in the state to collect and use information in the best interest of the population. However, LifeGene is more than just a continuation of information-gathering-as-usual in a country where the government has long kept track of its population’s health and social characteristics. With LifeGene, the construction of surrounding research infrastructures, and a reworking of national data protection legislation, Swedish researchers and authorities are now purposely building a framework for moving from data-as-usual to Big Data and the Big Value it promises to deliver. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork with Swedish researchers and data managers, this article will examine the legal, social and infrastructural challenges of Sweden’s bid for Big Data.

Keywords

Big Data Sweden biobanks medical research infrastructure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (award number BCS-0921847), the Social Science Research Council, and the Fulbright Program. A fellowship at the Brocher Foundation in 2011 allowed me to begin preliminary work on this project. I would like to thank Rayna Rapp and Linda Hogle, the editors of this special issue, for their invaluable feedback on this article.

References

  1. Adams, V., Murphy, M. and Clarke, A.E. (2009) Anticipation: Technoscience, life, affect, temporality. Subjectivity 28: 246–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, N. et al (2012) UK Biobank: Current status and what it means for epidemiology. Health Policy and Technology 1(3): 123–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Almqvist, C. et al (2011) LifeGene – A large prospective population-based study of global relevance. European Journal of Epidemiology 26(1): 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anell, A., Glenngard, A.H. and Merkur, S. (2012) Sweden: Health system review. Health Systems in Transition 14(5): 1–159.Google Scholar
  5. Asdal, K. and Gradmann, C. (2014) Introduction: Science, technology, medicine – And the state: The science-state nexus in Scandinavia, 1850–1980. Science in Context 27(2): 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Austin, M.A., Harding, S. and McElroy, C. (2003) Genebanks: A comparison of eight proposed international genetic databases. Community Genetics 6(1): 37–45.Google Scholar
  7. Axelsson, A.S. and Schroeder, R. (2009) Making it open and keeping it safe: e-Enabled data-sharing in Sweden. Acta Sociologica 52(3): 213–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Axelsson, P. (2010) Abandoning “the other”: Statistical enumeration of Swedish Sami, 1700 to 1945 and beyond. Berichte zur Wissenschaftsgeschichte 33(3): 263–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BioBankCloud (2012) BioBankCloud: Your PaaS for biobanking, http://www.biobankcloud.eu, accessed 15 May 2014.
  10. Bauer, S. (2014) From administrative infrastructure to biomedical resource: Danish population registries, the “Scandinavian laboratory,” and the “epidemiologist’s dream”. Science in Context 27(2): 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benner, M. (2003) The Scandinavian challenge: The future of advanced welfare states in the knowledge economy. Acta Sociologica 46(2): 132–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bygrave, L.A. (2010) Privacy and data protection in an international perspective. Scandinavian Studies in Law 56: 165–200.Google Scholar
  13. Cool, A. and Hoshor, A. (2012) Swedish consensus politics: Between technocracy and public participation. Paper presented at Society for Social Studies of Science Annual Meeting; 19 October, Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  14. Collins, R. (2012) What makes UK biobank special? The Lancet 379(9822): 1173–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dagens Nyheter (2012) Mål utan debatt om medel. 5 March.Google Scholar
  16. Dagens Nyheter (2013) Gränslös övervakning. 7 September, http://www.dn.se/ledare/huvudledare/granslos-overvakning/, accessed 2 June 2014.
  17. Dahl, A.S. (2006) Sweden: Once a moral superpower, always a moral superpower? International Journal 61(4): 895–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Daston, L.J. and Galison, P.L. (2007) Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  19. Datainspektionen (Data Inspection Authority) (2011) Tillsyn enlight personuppgiftslagen (1998:204), PuL. LifeGene. 16 Dec., Diarienr 766–2011, at http://www.datainspektionen.se/Documents/beslut/2011-12-19-lifegene.pdf, accessed 15 May 2014.
  20. Datainspektionen (Data Inspection Authority) (n.d.) About us, http://www.datainspektionen.se/in-english/about-us/, accessed 12 June 2014.
  21. Eaker, S. (2012) Biobanks in health care in Sweden. Biobank Sweden, October, Newsletter no. 7.Google Scholar
  22. Ehn, B., Frykman, J. and Löfgren, O. (1993) Forsvenskningen av Sverige. Det nationellas forvandlingar. Stockholm, Sweden: Natur och Kultur.Google Scholar
  23. European Commission (2014) Progress on EU data protection reform now irreversible following European Parliament vote, 3 December, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-186_en.htm, accessed 15 May 2014. European Commission MEMO/14/186.
  24. Eyerman, R. (1985) Rationalizing intellectuals: Sweden in the 1930s and 1940s. Theory and Society 14(6): 777–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fortun, M. (2008) Promising Genomics : Iceland and deCODE Genetics in a World of Speculation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Franklin, S. (1995) Science as culture, cultures of science. Annual Reviews in Anthropology 24: 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilmour, J. (2011) Sweden, the Swastika and Stalin: The Swedish Experience in the Second World War. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Görnerup, O., Gillblad, D., Holst, A. and Bjurling, B. (2012) Big Data analytics: A research and innovation agenda for Sweden. Stockholm, Sweden: Vinnova. http://www.vinnova.se/PageFiles/0/Big%20Data%20Analytics.pdf, accessed 8 March 2015.
  29. Hansson, S.O. and Björkman, B. (2006) Bioethics in Sweden. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15(3): 285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Helgesson, G. (2012) In defense of broad consent. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 21(1): 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Helgesson, G. and Eriksson, S. (2011) Four themes in recent Swedish bioethics debates. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20(3): 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hens, K., Lévesque, E. and Dierickx, K. (2011) Children and biobanks: A review of the ethical and legal discussion. Human Genetics 130(3): 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hirdman, Y. (1989) Att lägga livet tillrätta: studier i svensk folkhemspolitik. Stockholm, Sweden: Carlsson.Google Scholar
  34. Hoeyer, K. (2003) Science is really needed – That’s all I know: Informed consent and the non-verbal practices of collecting blood for genetic research in northern Sweden. New Genetics & Society 22(3): 229–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoeyer, K. (2005) The role of ethics in commercial genetic research: Notes on the notion of commodification. Medical Anthropology 24: 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hoeyer, K. (2006) The power of ethics: A case study from Sweden on the social life of moral concerns in policy processes. Sociology of Health and Illness 28(6): 785–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoeyer, K.L. and Tutton, R. (2005) “Ethics was here”: Studying the language-games of ethics in the case of UK biobank. Critical Public Health 15(4): 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hovde Lyngstad, T. and Skardhamar, T. (2011) Nordic register data and their untapped potential for criminological knowledge. Crime and Justice 40(1): 613–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ioannidis, J.P.A. (2013) Informed consent, big data, and the oxymoron of research that is not research. American Journal of Bioethics 13(4): 40–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Janson, C.G. (2006) Commentary: The revitalization of the Stockholm metropolitan study. International Journal of Epidemiology 35(3): 553–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johannisson, K. (2012) Rebecca Skloot: “Den odödliga Henrietta Lacks.” Dagens Nyheter 23 January.Google Scholar
  42. Jonsson, J.L. (2014) Våra digitala fotspår kan ge smartare städer Dagens Nyheter 16 February, pp. 20–21.Google Scholar
  43. Kälvemark, A.S. (1977) The country that kept track of its population: Methodological aspects of Swedish population records. Scandinavian Journal of History 2(1–4): 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kaiser, J. (2013) Agency nixes deCODE’s new data-mining plan. Science 340(6139): 1388–1389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keating, P. and Cambrosio, A. (2000) Biomedical platforms. Configurations 8(3): 337–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kielos, K. (2013) En öppen värld – för genierna. Aftonbladet, 23 June, http://www.aftonbladet.se/ledare/ledarkronika/katrinekielos/article17006733.ab, accessed 12 May 2014.
  47. Kuo, W.H. (2011) Techno-politics of genomic nationalism: Tracing genomics and its use in drug regulation in Japan and Taiwan. Social Science & Medicine 73(8): 1200–1207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lagerwall, K. (2013) Använd inte sociala medier för seriösa saker. Dagens Nyheter 12 June, http://www.dn.se/ekonomi/anvand-inte-sociala-medier-for-seriosa-saker/, accessed 15 June 2014.
  49. Langhoff-Roos, J. et al (2014) The Nordic medical birth registers – A potential goldmine for clinical research. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 93(2): 132–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. LifeGene (2009) LifeGene ethics policy: Version 3.2, February, http://lifegene.ki.se/ethical_issues/documents/090331LifeGeneEthicsPolicyv32.pdf, accessed 15 May 2014.
  51. LifeGene (2010) LifeGene: A unique initiative for health. August, https://www.lifegene.se/PageFiles/102/general_lg_presentation_aug_2010.pdf, accessed 15 May 2014.
  52. LifeGene (n.d.) “LifeGene Rationale,” https://www.lifegene.se/PageFiles/102/20090206_lifeGene_Rationale.pdf, accessed 15 May 2014.
  53. Ludvigsson, J.F., Otterblad-Olausson, P., Pettersson, B.U. and Ekbom, A. (2009) The Swedish personal identity number: Possibilities and pitfalls in healthcare and medical research. European Journal of Epidemiology 24(11): 659–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Maeurer, M. (2010) Markus Maeurer on the LifeGene project. Expert Review of Clinical Immunology 6(5): 709–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mayer-Schönberger, V. and Cukier, K. (2013) Big Data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  56. Mitchell, R. and Waldby, C. (2010) National biobanks: Clinical labor, risk production, and the creation of biovalue. Science, Technology, & Human Values 35(3): 330–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Myrdal, A. and Myrdal, G. (1934) Kris i befolkningsfrågan. Stockholm, Sweden: Bonnier.Google Scholar
  58. Nilsson, A.S. (1991) Den moraliska stormakten: en studie av socialdemokratins internationella aktivism. Stockholm, Sweden: Timbro.Google Scholar
  59. Nilsson, J. (2012) Stoppat super-register mot cancer ska räddas. Dagens Nyheter, 28 Feb. Available at http://www.dn.se/nyheter/politik/stoppat-super-register-mot-cancer-ska-raddas/, accessed 22 June 2015.
  60. Nobel, S. (2008) Biobanks – Integration of Human Information to Improve Health. Stockholm, Sweden: Committee for Research Infrastructures and the Scientific Council for Medicine at the Swedish Research Council. Swedish Research Council Report Series no.10. Available at http://vr.se/download/18.235f40c212384f2ca668000177/1340207439890/Biobanks_2008_10.pdf, accessed 25 July 2014.
  61. Öman, S. (2010) Trends in data protection law. Scandinavian Studies in Law 56: 210–205.Google Scholar
  62. Pálsson, G. and Rabinow, P. (1999) Iceland: The case of a national human genome project. Anthropology Today 15: 14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pálsson, G. and Rabinow, P. (2001) The Icelandic genome debate. Trends Biotechnol 19(5): 166–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Petersen, A. (2005) Securing our genetic health: Engendering trust in UK Biobank. Sociology of Health & Illness 27(2): 271–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Porter, T.M. (1996) Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pred, A. (2001) Unspeakable Spaces racisms past and present on exhibit in Stockholm, or the unaddressable addressed. City & Society 13(1): 119–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pukkala, E. (2011) Biobanks and registers in epidemiologic research on cancer. In: J. Dillner (ed.) Methods in Biobanking, Methods in Molecular Biology. New York: Springer, pp. 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Qwerin, G. (1987) Metropolit i massmedia. Sweden: National Council for Crime Prevention, BRA Forskning, 4.Google Scholar
  69. Rajan, K.S. (2006) Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rebas, K. (2013) Det är du som är produkten. Dagens Nyheter 9 August, http://www.dn.se/ledare/kolumner/det-ar-du-som-ar-produkten/, accessed 14 June 2014.
  71. Regeringens Proposition (2008) Ett lyft för forskning och innovation (A boost for research and innovation). Stockholm, Sweden, 20 October. Prop. 2008/09:50.Google Scholar
  72. Regeringens Proposition (2013) Vissa register för forskning om vad arv och miljö betyder för människors hälsa (Some registers for research on what nature and nurture mean for human health). 23 May. Prop. 2012/13:163.Google Scholar
  73. Riles, A. (ed.) (2006) Documents: Artifacts of Modern Knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rose, N. (1991) Governing by numbers: Figuring out democracy. Accounting, Organizations and Society 16(7): 673–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rothstein, B. (2006) Vad bör staten göra?: om välfärdsstatens moraliska och politiska logik. Stockholm, Sweden: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar
  76. Schadt, E.E. (2012) The changing privacy landscape in the era of big data. Molecular Systems Biology 8: 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sejersted, F. (2011) The Age of Social Democracy: Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Shapin, S., Schaffer, S. and Hobbes, T. (1985) Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Sköld, P. (2004) The birth of population statistics in Sweden. History of the Family 9(1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Statens Offentliga Utredningar (SOU) (2014) Unik kunskap genom registerforskning, 25 June, Stockholm, Sweden: Utbildningsdepartamentet, SOU 2014:45.Google Scholar
  81. Stevens, H. (2013) Life Out of Sequence: A Data-driven History of Bioinformatics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Swedish Research Council (SRC) (2012) The Swedish Research Council’s guide to infrastructures 2012: Recommendations on long-term research infrastructures by the research councils and Vinnova. Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Research Council. Vetenskapsrådets Rapportserie, 3.Google Scholar
  83. Swedish Research Council (SRC) (2014) Swedish Science Cases for E-Infrastructure, 15 March, Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Research Council.Google Scholar
  84. Svensk författningssamling (SFS) (2013) Lag (2013:794) om visa register för forskning om vad arv och miljö betyder för människors hälsa, 24 October, Stockholm, Sweden: Utbildningsdepartementet.Google Scholar
  85. Taussig, K.S., Hoeyer, K. and Helmreich, S. (2013) The anthropology of potentiality in biomedicine: An introduction to supplement 7. Current Anthropology 54(S7): S3–S14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Traweek, S. (1992) Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Triendl, R. (2003) Japan launches controversial Biobank project. Nat Med 9: 982–982 doi: 10.1038/nm0803-982b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Utbildningsdepartamentet (2012) Nya beslut om medicinsk forskning (pressmeddelande). Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Education, 28 February.Google Scholar
  89. Waldby, C. (2002) Stem cells, tissue cultures and the production of biovalue. Health 6(3): 305.Google Scholar
  90. Waldby, C. and Mitchell, R. (2006) Tissue Economies: Blood, Organs, and Cell Lines in Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Watson, I. (2010) A short history of national identification numbering in Iceland. Bifröst Journal of Social Science 4: 51–89.Google Scholar
  92. Winickoff, D.E. (2006) Genome and nation: Iceland’s health sector database and its legacy. Innovations 1(2): 80–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alison Cool
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations