Advertisement

BioSocieties

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 308–321 | Cite as

Human development, nature and nurture: Working beyond the divide

  • Ilina Singh
Thinking on the Edge

Abstract

In this essay, I explore what social science might contribute to building a better understanding of relations between ‘nature’ and ‘nurture’ in human development. I first outline changing scientific perspectives on the role of the environment in the developmental and behavioural sciences, beginning with a general historical view of the developmental science of human potentials in the twentieth century, and then reflecting on a call to arms against ‘toxic stress’ issued in 2012 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. I suggest that such post-genomic programmes of early intervention, which draw on emerging scientific theories of organismic plasticity and developmental malleability, raise significant social and ethical concerns. At the same time, such programmes challenge social scientists to move beyond critique and to contribute to new developmental models that deconstruct the old divide between nature and nurture. I conclude by describing efforts that posit new terms of reference and, simultaneously, new kinds of research interests and questions that are not founded upon, and are not efforts to resolve, the nature–nurture debate.

Keywords

epigenetics children toxic stress Nurse–Family Partnership ecobiodevelopmental model plasticity 

References

  1. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979) The Ecology of Human Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Champagne, F.A. (2010a) Epigenetic influence of social experiences across the lifespan. Developmental Psychobiology 52 (4): 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Champagne, F.A. (2010b) Early adversity and developmental outcomes: Interaction between genetics, epigenetics and social experiences across the lifespan. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5 (5): 564–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), Administration for Children and Families. (2010, January) Head Start Impact Study, Final Report. Washington DC: DHHS.Google Scholar
  5. Dillon, M. (2007) Governing terror: The state of emergency of biopolitical emergence. International Political Sociology 1 (1): 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dugdale, R. (1969 [1877] ) The Jukes: A Study of Crime, Pauperism, Disease and Heredity, Paper 1, Georgia, USA: GSU College of Law Faculty Publications, http://digitalarchive.gsu.edu/col_facpub/1.Google Scholar
  7. Eckenrode, J. et al (2010) Long-term effects of prenatal and infancy nurse home visitation on the life course of youths: 19-year follow-up of a randomized trial. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 164 (1): 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fox Keller, E. (2010) The Mirage of a Space between Nature and Nurture. Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Francis, R.C. (2011) Epigenetics: The Ultimate Mystery of Inheritance. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  10. Franklin, S. and Roberts, C. (2006) Born and Made: An Ethnography of Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gaudillie`re, J.-P. and Rheinberger, H.-J. (eds.) (2004) From Molecular Genetics to Genomics: The Mapping Cultures of Twentieth Century Genetics. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goddard, H.H. (1912) The Kallikak Family: A Study in the Heredity of Feeble Mindedness. New York: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Re-Invention of Nature. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Harrington, A. (2008) The Cure Within: A History of Mind-Body Medicine. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Healy, D. (1999) The Anti-Depressant Era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Horowitz, A. (2002) Creating Mental Illness. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Jablonka, E. and Lamb, M. (2005) Evolution in Four Dimensions: Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kristof, N.D. (2012) The poverty solution that starts with a hug. New York Times Sunday Review, 7 January, http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/08/opinion/sunday/kristof-a-poverty-solution-that-starts-with-a-hug.html.
  19. Kutchins, H. and Kirk, S.A. (1999) Making Us Crazy. New York: Constable.Google Scholar
  20. Laing, R.D. and Esterson, A. (1970) Sanity, Madness and the Family: Families of Schizophrenics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Lederbogen, F. et al (2011) City living and urban upbringing affect neural social stress processing in humans. Nature 474 (7352): 498–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lock, M. (2001) The tempering of medical anthropology: Troubling natural categories. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15 (4): 478–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lombroso, C. (2004 [1876]) Criminal Man. Chapel Hill, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Low, S.M. (1981) The meaning of nervios: A sociocultural analysis of symptom presentation in San Jose, Costa Rica. Culture, Medicine & Psychiatry 5 (1): 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Niewohner, J. (2011) Epigenetics: Embedded bodies and the molecularisation of biography and milieu. BioSocieties 6 (4): 279–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roepstorff, A., Niewohner, J. and Beck, S. (2010) Enculturing brains through patterned practices. Neural Networks 23 (8–9): 1051–1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shonkoff, J.P. et al (2011) Early childhood adversity, toxic stress and the role of the pediatrician: Translating developmental science into lifelong health. Pediatrics 26 (December): e232–e246.Google Scholar
  28. Shorter, E. (1997) A History of Psychiatry: From the Era of the Asylum to the Age of Prozac. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Shostak, S. (forthcoming 2013) Defining Vulnerabilities: Genes, the Environment, and the Politics of Population Health. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  30. Showalter, E. (1998) Hystories: Hysteria, Gender and Culture. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  31. Singh, I. (2002) Bad boys, good mothers and the ‘miracle’ of Ritalin. Science in Context 15 (4): 577–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Singh, I. (2011) A disorder of anger and aggression: Children's perspectives on attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the UK. Social Science and Medicine, Special Issue on Diagnosis 73 (6): 889–896.Google Scholar
  33. Skinner, B.F. (1938) The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
  34. Skinner, B.F. (2005 [1948]) Walden Two. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. Sulloway, F. (1992) Freud, Biologist of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Szasz, T. (1961) The Myth of Mental Illness: Foundations of a Theory of Personal Conduct. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  37. Walsh, P., Elsabbagh, M., Bolton, P. and Singh, I. (2011) In search of biomarkers for autism: Scientific, policy and ethical challenges. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 12 (10): 603–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The London School of Economics and Political Science 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilina Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.London School of Economics & Political ScienceLondonUK

Personalised recommendations