Advertisement

BioSocieties

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 180–198 | Cite as

Design in synthetic biology

  • Adrian Mackenzie
Original Article

Abstract

Significant transformations in biological technique and biological work are taking place in the aftermath of genomics. Although existing accounts of genomics and biotechnology contend that species differences and evolutionary histories have undergone ‘flattening’ by molecular techniques and concepts, analysis of design practices in synthetic biology suggests that vertical aggregations of biological technique, substance and work are occurring. This article analyses the movement of design processes into biology by examining software, diagrams and forms of collaboration intersecting in the production of biological constructs such as metabolic pathways, minimal genomes and biological standard parts. In characterising the design processes taking shape in synthetic biology, it develops the concepts of ‘meta-technique’ and ‘meta-material’. The notion of design as a meta-technique shows how synthetic biology assembles techniques and renders them available via practices of collaboration and standardisation. The notion of meta-material suggests ways of thinking about the dynamism of living things infused by models, constructs and layered work-processes. The practical re-deployment of biological techniques we see in the design software, the development of increasingly extensive and interlinked biological constructs assembled by design, and the shifting enrolments of biological work associated with design as a decoupled work process alter what counts as biological work and what counts as biological substance. The increasing salience of biological design has significant implications for how we conceptualise participation in biotechnology and biomedicine more generally.

Keywords

synthetic biology design technique materiality emergence new media 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was undertaken with funding from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) UK. I would like to acknowledge the ESRC's support.

References

  1. Abelson, H. (1996) Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Akagi, K. et al (1997) Cre-mediated somatic site-specific recombination in mice. Nucleic Acids Research 25 (9): 1766–1773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrianantoandro, E., Basu, S., Karig, D. and Weiss, R. (2006) Synthetic biology: New engineering rules for an emerging discipline. Molecular System Biology 2, 2006.0028, doi:10.1038/msb4100073.Google Scholar
  4. Autodesk Inc. (2009) Autodesk – 2D and 3D design and engineering software for architecture, manufacturing, and digital entertainment, http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet/home?id=14173983&siteID=123112, accessed 24 November 2009.
  5. Balmer, A. and Martin, P. (2008) Synthetic Biology Social and Ethical Challenges. Nottingham, UK: Institute for Science and Society, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
  6. Chan, L., Kosuri, S. and Endy, D. (2005) Refactoring bacteriophage T7. Molecular Systems Biology 1, //WOS:000243244500019 doi:10.1038/msb4100073.Google Scholar
  7. Clotho. (2008) Tools – PBD of synthetic biological tools, http://biocad-server.eecs.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Tools#Clotho, accessed 24 November 2009.
  8. Cooper, M. (2008) Life as Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  9. Czar, M., Cai, Y. and Peccoud, J. (2009) Writing DNA with GenoCAD (TM). Nucleic Acids Research 37: W40–W47, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DNA2.0. (2009a) Synthetic Genes – Gene synthesis overview – DNA2.0, https://www.dna20.com/index.php?pageID=17, accessed 18 November 2009.
  11. DNA2.0. (2009b) Gene synthesis customization options – Improve heterologous expression – DNA2.0, https://www.dna20.com/index.php?pageID=217, accessed 18 November 2009.
  12. Eclipse Foundation. (2009) Eclipse.org home, http://www.eclipse.org/, accessed 24 November 2009.
  13. Flusser, V. (1999) The Shape of Things: A Philosophy of Design. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  14. Forster, A. and Church, G. (2007) Synthetic biology projects in vitro. Genome Research 17: 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Foucault, M., Gros, F., Ewald, F. and Fontana, A. (2005) The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the Colláege de France, 1981–1982, Vol. 1. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bios/hol059/2004049020.html, http://www.loc.gov/catdir/description/hol053/2004049020.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fowler, M. (2008) Refactoring Home, http://www.refactoring.com/, accessed 18 November 2009.
  17. Franklin, S., Lury, C. and Stacey, J. (2000) Global nature, global culture. Gender, Theory and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  18. Friedman, T.L. (2005) The World is Flat: A Brief History of the Twenty-First Century, Vol.1.New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  19. Garfinkel, M.S., Endy, D., Epstein, G.L. and Friedman, R.M. (2007) Synthetic Genomics Options for Governance. In: J. Craig (ed.) Rockville, Maryland: Venter Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Geeknet, Inc. (2009) SourceForge.net: Find and develop open source software, http://sourceforge.net/, accessed 16 November 2009.
  21. GENEART AG. (2009) GENEART supports iGEM contest for the third year in a row. GENEART – Excellence in DNA Engineering and Processing: Gene Synthesis, Directed Evolution, Plasmid Services, http://www.geneart.com/english/events-press/press/latest-press-releases/pressdetail/article/geneart-supports-igem-contest-for-the-third-year-in-a-row-1/index.html?no_cache=1&cHash=e0ab0227e2, accessed 29 June 2009.
  22. Gibson, D.G. (2008) Complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Science 319 (5867): 1215–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glass, J. et al (2006) Essential genes of a minimal bacterium. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (2): 425–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. (1999) Situated knowledges. The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In: M. Biagioli (ed.) The Science Studies Reader. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 172–188.Google Scholar
  25. Hill, A., Tomshine, J., Weeding, E., Sotiropoulos, V. and Kaznessis, Y. (2008) SynBioSS: The synthetic biology modeling suite. Bioinformatics 24 (21): 2551–2553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kitney, R. (2007) Synthetic biology – Engineering biologically-based devices and systems. 11th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2007, Vols 1 and 2, 16 (1–2): 1138–1139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Landecker, H. (2007) Culturing Life: How Cells Became Technologies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lentzos, F., Bennett, G., Boeke, J., Endy, D. and Rabinow, P. (2008) Visions and challenges in redesigning life. BioSocieties 3 (3): 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Margolin, V. (2002) The Politics of the Artificial: Essays on Design and Design Studies. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Marshall, W. (2008) Engineering design principles for organelle size control systems. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 19 (6): 520–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin, V.J., Pitera, D., Withers, S., Newman, J. and Keasling, J. (2003) Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Eschicheria coli for production of terpenoids. Nature Biotechnology 21 (7): 796–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nader, E. and Ziolkowski, R.W. (2006) Metamaterials: Physics and Engineering Explorations. Wiley & Sons, http://books.google.com/books?id=51e0UkEuBP4C.Google Scholar
  33. O'Malley, M., Powell, A., Davies, J. and Calvert, J. (2008) Knowledge-making distinctions in synthetic biology. Bioessays 30 (1): 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. OWW. (2009) Main page – OpenWetWare, http://openwetware.org/wiki/Main_Page, accessed 21 July 2009.
  35. Parisi, L. (2007) Biotech: Life by contagion. Theory Culture & Society 24: 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pottage, A. (2006) Too much ownership: Bio-prospecting in the age of synthetic biology. BioSocieties 1: 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Purnick, P.E.M. and Weiss, R. (2009) The second wave of synthetic biology: From modules to systems. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 10 (6): 410–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rabinow, P. and Bennett, G. (2008) Ars Synthetica: Designs for Human Practice. Houston, TX: Rice University Press, http://cnx.org/content/col10612/1.2/.Google Scholar
  39. Rajan, K.S. (2003) GENOMIC CAPITAL: Public cultures and market logics of corporate biotechnology. Science as Culture 12 (1): 87–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rheinberger, H. (2008) What happened to molecular biology? BioSocieties 3: 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rinie van Est, H.D.V. (2007) Constructing Life. The World of Synthetic Biology. The Hague: Rathenau Institut.Google Scholar
  42. Ro, D.K. et al (2006) Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature 440 (April): 940–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rose, N. (2006) The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. sricha11. (2006) GeneDesign β2.0, http://baderlab.bme.jhu.edu/gd/, accessed 24 November 2009.
  45. Suchman, L. (2006) Human and Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sunder Rajan, K. (2006) Biocapital: The Constitution of Postgenomic Life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip062/2005030718.html.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thackara, J. (2005) In the Bubble: Designing in a Complex World. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  48. Thacker, E. (2005) The Global Genome: Biotechnology, Politics, and Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Venter, J.C., Smith, H.O. and Hutchinson III, C.A. (2007) Synthetic Genomes. USPTO Application Number US2007/0264688.Google Scholar
  50. Villalobos, A., Ness, J., Gustafsson, C., Minshull, J. and Govindarajan, S. (2006) Gene designer: A synthetic biology tool for constructing artificial DNA segments. BMC Bioinformatics 7, doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-285.Google Scholar
  51. Watson, J.D. (2007) Recombinant DNA: Genes and Genomes: A Short Course, Vol. 3. New York: W.H. Freeman; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
  52. Weiss, R. (2007) Synthetic biology: From bacteria to stem cells. 44th Acm/Ieee Design Automation Conference, San Diego, 4–8 June, Vols. 1 and 2, pp. 634–635.Google Scholar
  53. Wheale, P. and McNally, R.M. (1990) The Bio-Revolution: Cornucopia or Pandora's Box?, Genetic engineering series. London; Winchester, MA: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  54. Willimsky, G. and Blankenstein, T. (2007) The adaptive immune response to sporadic cancer. Immunological Reviews 220 (1): 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The London School of Economics and Political Science 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Mackenzie
    • 1
  1. 1.CESAGEN – Centre for Social and Economic Aspects of Genomics, IAS Building, Lancaster UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations