BioSocieties

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 36–51 | Cite as

‘Civilizing technologies’ and the control of deviance

  • Scott Vrecko
Original Article

Abstract

This article contributes to cultural theorizations of the regulation of deviant forms of thought and behaviour through an analysis of scientific accounts of, and approaches to, managing ‘behavioural addictions’. Much cultural analysis assumes that biomedical formulations of addiction simply provide a scientific façade for forms of social control, and hence, that such formulations are unworthy of serious consideration. I argue that critical inquiries into processes of social change and social regulation could be strengthened by carefully considering, and engaging with, contemporary addiction medicine; and provide an example of such an approach by examining some of the new descriptions of people, emotions and behaviours – as well as new means of acting on individuals, feelings and conduct – that have begun to emerge within theories, therapies and popular science representations that frame behavioural addictions as brain diseases. Although recognizing the validity of some biomedical claims – for example, that there are physiological components to behavioural compulsions, and that effective addiction therapies may act on the bodies of patients – I argue against conceptualizing behavioural compulsions as diseases, and against conceptualizing therapeutic interventions for such compulsions as ‘treatments’. Instead, I make the case that, according to biomedical discourses themselves, it is more accurate to describe addiction interventions – which are used to produce better citizens, rather than to cure biological diseases – as ‘civilizing technologies’.

Keywords

compulsion deviance civilizing process human kinds addiction behaviour 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article has benefitted from feedback that the author received when presenting early versions of this article at the University of Pennsylvania, Monash University (Prato campus), and especially the ‘Addiction, the Brain, and Society Conference’ conference at Emory University. Linsey McGoey and anonymous referees also provided helpful, and much appreciated, comments and insights.

References

  1. Acker, C.J. (1995) Addiction and the laboratory: The work of the National Research Council’s Committee on Drug Addiction, 1928–1939. Isis 86 (2): 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acker, C.J. (2002) Creating the American Junkie: Addiction Research in the Classic Era of Narcotic Control. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Arehart-Treichel, J. (2006) Pathological gambling symptoms respond to addiction drug. Psychiatric News 41 (5): 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, H.S. (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. London: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  5. Bederman, G. and Stimpson, C.R. (1996) Manliness & Civilization: A Cultural History of Gender and Race in the United States, 1880–1917. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Berridge, V. (1990) Dependence: Historical concepts and constructs. In: G. Edwards and M. Lader (eds.) The Nature of Drug Dependence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
  7. Berridge, V. and Edwards, G. (1981) Opium and the People: Opiate Use in Nineteenth-century England. London: Lane.Google Scholar
  8. Bostwick, J.M. and Bucci, J.A. (2008) Internet sex addiction treated with naltrexone. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 83: 226–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourgois, P. (2000) Disciplining addictions: The bio-politics of methadone and heroin in the United States. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 24 (2): 165–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchman, D.Z. (2007) Neglecting the social system: Clinical neuroimaging and the biological reductionism of addiction. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 2 (2): 1–5.Google Scholar
  11. Bullock, K. and Koran, L. (2003) Psychopharmacology of compulsive buying. Drugs Today (Barc) 39 (9): 695–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burnham, T. and Phelan, J. (2000) Mean Genes: From Sex to Money to Food, Taming our Primal Instincts. London: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  13. Carnes, P., Murray, R. and Charpentier, L. (2005) Bargains with chaos: Sex addicts and the addiction interaction disorder. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity 12: 79–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Campbell, N.D . (2007) Discovering Addiction: The Science and Politics of Substance Abuse Research. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Campbell, N.D. (2010) Towards a critical neuroscience of ‘addiction’. BioSocieties 5 (1): 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chin, R. (2001) Gamblers, kleptomaniacs and others with impulse-control disorders are the subjects of a U of M researcher. Saint Paul Pioneer Press, 18 March, p. 1F.Google Scholar
  17. Courtwright, D.T. (2010) The NIDA brain-disease paradigm: history, resistance, and spinoffs. BioSocieties 5 (1): 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cox, D. (2001) Pills may help cure gambling addiction. Reno Gazette-Journal, 14 March, p. 1A.Google Scholar
  19. Crockford, D.N. and el-Guebaly, N. (1998) Naltrexone in the treatment of pathological gambling and alcohol dependence. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 43 (1): 86.Google Scholar
  20. DeGrandpre, R.J. (2006) The Cult of Pharmacology: How America Became the World’s Most Troubled Drug Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deluca, A. (2001) Moderation Management members’ experiences with naltrexone (ReVia) as an aid to controlled drinking, http://www.doctordeluca.com/Library/AbstinenceHR/ControlledDrinkingControversy.htm, accessed 18 March 2005.
  22. Elias, N. (1994) The Civilizing Process. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Feeney, D. (2002) Interview with Dr Kim, http://www.psychiatry.umn.edu/psychiatry/research/ gambling/interview/home.html, accessed 5 May 2005.Google Scholar
  24. Fitterman, L. (2003) Shopaholics take heart – Help is nigh. The Gazette, 29 September, p. D2.Google Scholar
  25. Giddens, A. (1992) Love, Sex and Other Addictions. In the Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality, Love, and Eroticism. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 64–86.Google Scholar
  26. Giddens, A. (2007) All addictions turn from pleasure to dependency. Guardian, 16 October, p. 32.Google Scholar
  27. Grant, J.E. (2003) Three cases of compulsive buying treated with naltrexone. International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice 7 (3): 223–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grant, J.E. (2005) Outcome study of kleptomania patients treated with naltrexone: A chart review. Clinical Neuropharmacology 28 (1): 11–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grant, J.E. and Kim, S.W. (2002) An open-label study of naltrexone in the treatment of kleptomania. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 63 (4): 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Grant, J.E., Kim, S.W. and Hartman, B.K. (2008) A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the opiate antagonist naltrexone in the treatment of pathological gambling urges. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 69 (5): 783–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grant, J.E., Kim, S.W. and Potenza, M.N. (2003) Advances in the pharmacological treatment of pathological gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies 19 (1): 85–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grant, J.E. et al (2006) Multicenter investigation of the opioid antagonist nalmefene in the treatment of pathological gambling. American Journal of Psychiatry 163 (2): 303–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hacking, I. (1995a) The looping effects of human kinds. In: D. Sperber, D. Premack and A.J. Premack (eds.) Causal Cognition: A Multidisciplinary Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hacking, I. (1995b) Rewriting the Soul: Multiple Personality and the Sciences of Memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hacking, I. (2002) Making up People. In Historical Ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 99–114.Google Scholar
  36. Healy, D. (2002) The Creation of Psychopharmacology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Irvine, J.M. (1995) Reinventing perversion: Sex addiction and cultural anxieties. Journal of the History of Sexuality 5 (3): 429–450.Google Scholar
  38. Katherine, A. (1996) Anatomy of a Food Addiction: The Brain Chemistry of Overeating. Carlsbad, CA: Gurze Books.Google Scholar
  39. Keane, H. (2004) Disorders of desire: Addiction and problems of intimacy. Journal of Medical Humanities 25 (3): 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Keane, H. and Hamill, K. (2010) Variations in addiction: The molecular and the molar in neuroscience and pain medicine. BioSocieties 5 (1): 52–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim, S.W. (1998) Opioid antagonists in the treatment of impulse-control disorders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 59 (4): 159–164.Google Scholar
  42. Kim, S.W., Grant, J.E. and Grosz, R.L. (2002) Pathological gambling. Current status and new treatments. Minnesota Medicine 85 (7): 48–50.Google Scholar
  43. Kramer, P.D. (1992) Listening to Prozac. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
  44. Kuhar, M.J. (2010) Contributions of basic science to understandings addiction. BioSocieties 5 (1): 25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kushner, H.I. (2010) Toward a cultural biology of addiction. BioSocieties 5 (1): 8–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lakoff, A. (2005) Pharmaceutical Reason: Knowledge and Value in Global Psychiatry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Latour, B. (1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Leshner, A.I. (2001) Addiction is a brain disease. Issues in Science and Technology 17 (3): 75–80.Google Scholar
  49. Lowinson, J.H. (2005) Substance Abuse: A Comprehensive Textbook. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  50. Marcotty, J. and Lerner, M. (2001) New hope for gambling addicts. Star Tribune, 11 March, p. 1B.Google Scholar
  51. Marks, I. (1990) Behavioural (non-chemical) addictions. Addiction 85: 1389–1394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marrazzi, M.A., Markham, K.M., Kinzie, J. and Luby, E.D. (1995) Binge eating disorder: Response to naltrexone. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders 19 (2): 143–145.Google Scholar
  53. McGoey, L. and Jackson, E. (2009) Seroxat and the suppression of clinical trial data: Regulatory failure and the uses of legal ambiguity. British Medical Journal 35 (2): 107.Google Scholar
  54. Modesto-Lowe, V. and Van Kirk, J. (2002) Clinical uses of naltrexone: A review of the evidence. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology 10 (3): 213–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Pickering, A. (1995) The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Potenza, M.N. (2001) The neurobiology of pathological gambling. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry 6: 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Powell, D. (1995) Why we can’t resist some things. Charlotte Observer, 21 January, p. 1C.Google Scholar
  58. Raymond, N.C., Grant, J.E., Kim, S.W. and Coleman, E. (2002) Treatment of compulsive sexual behaviour with naltrexone and serotonin reuptake inhibitors: Two case studies. International Clinical Psychopharmacology 17 (4): 201–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reinarman, C. (2005) Addiction as accomplishment: The discursive construction of disease. Addiction Research & Theory 13 (4): 307–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reith, G. (2004) Consumption and its discontents: Addiction, identity and the problems of freedom. The British Journal of Sociology 55 (2): 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ruden, R.A. and Byalick, M. (1997) The Craving Brain: A Bold New Approach to Breaking Free from Drug Addiction, Overeating, Alcoholism, and Gambling. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  62. Ryback, R.S. (2004) Naltrexone in the treatment of adolescent sexual offenders. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 65 (7): 982–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Said, E.W. (1995) Orientalism. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  64. Sedgwick, E.K. (1993) Epidemics of the Will. In: Tendencies, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Smith, D.E. (1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  66. Smith, D.E. (1998) Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations. Toronto, ON; Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  67. Symons, E.-K. (1999) $200 a month to stop the craving. Daily Telegraph, 1 March, p. 2.Google Scholar
  68. Szasz, T.S. (1974) Ceremonial Chemistry: The Ritual Persecution of Drugs, Addicts, and Pushers. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  69. The Economist. (1993) High and hooked: a better understanding of how addictions work could provide benefits for science, for medicine and for recreation. The Economist 327 (7811): 123–125.Google Scholar
  70. Valverde, M. (1998) Diseases of the Will: Alcohol and the Dilemmas of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Van Den Broek, A. (2003) Old treatments for new problems: Medications for pathological gambling show promising future. CrossCurrents: The Journal of Addiction and Mental Health (Winter 2003/2004), http://www.camh.net/Publications/Cross_Currents/Winter_2003/medsforgambling_crcuwinter0304.html.
  72. Van Krieken, R. (1999) The barbarism of civilization: Cultural genocide and the stolen generations. British Journal of Sociology 50 (2): 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Volkow, N. (2007) How science has revolutionized the understanding of drug addiction. In: Drugs, Brains, and Behavior: The Science of Addiction. Bestheda: National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  74. Vrecko, S. (2008) Capital ventures into biology: Biosocial dynamics in the industry and science of gambling. Economy and Society 37 (1): 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vrecko, S. (forthcoming) Globalization and everyday matters of health: On the productive assemblage of pharmaceuticals, obesity, and consumer culture. Theory and Society, accepted.Google Scholar
  76. Yeomans, M.R. and Gray, R.W. (2002) Opioid peptides and the control of human ingestive behaviour. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 26 (6): 713–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The London School of Economics and Political Science 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott Vrecko
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Sociology & PhilosophyUniversity of ExeterUK

Personalised recommendations