Acta Politica

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 367–388 | Cite as

When the gloves come off: Inter-party variation in negative campaigning in Dutch elections, 1981–2010

  • Annemarie S WalterEmail author
  • Wouter van der Brug
Original Article


This study examines changes in negative campaigning in the Netherlands between 1981 and 2010. In addition, we examine which factors determine whether political parties are likely to make use of this campaign strategy in the Dutch multi-party system. We advance existing research on negative campaigning in two ways. First of all, this is the most extensive study of negative campaigning in the Netherlands conducted so far and to our knowledge also the most extensive conducted in any multi-party system. Second, our study contributes to the theoretical understanding of the determinants of negative campaigning in a multi-party context by differentiating between parties’ vote-seeking and office-seeking incentives, and stating the implications of office-seeking for the use of negative campaigning.


negative campaigning multi-party system party competition election campaigns The Netherlands political parties 


  1. Andeweg, R.B. and Irwin, G.A. (2009) Governance and Politics of the Netherlands. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  2. Bartolini, S. (1998) Coalition potential and governmental power. In: P. Pennings and J.E. Lane (eds.) Comparing Party System Change. London: Routledge, pp. 40–61.Google Scholar
  3. Benoit, W.L. (1999) Seeing Spots: A Functional Analysis of Presidential Television Advertisements, 1952–1996. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  4. Benoit, W.L., McHale, J.P., Hansen, G.J., Pier, P.M. and McQuire, J.P. (2003) Campaign 2002: A Functional Analysis of Presidential Campaign Discourse. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Brants, K., Kok, W. and van Praag, P. (1982) De strijd om de Kiezersgunst, Verkiezingscampagnes in Nederland. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kobra.Google Scholar
  6. Brants, K. (2006) Sure to come, but temporarily delayed: The Netherlands in search of the political ad. In: L.L. Kaid and C. Holtz-Bacha (2006) The Sage Handbook of Political Advertising. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Budesheim, T.L., Houston, D.A. and DePaola, S.J. (1996) Persuasiveness of in-group and out-group political messages: The case of negative campaigning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Budge, I. and Farlie, D.J. (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies. London: Allen and Urwin.Google Scholar
  9. Butler, D. and Ranney, A. (eds.) (1992) Introduction. Electioneering: A Comparative Study of Continuity and Change. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
  10. Damore, D.F. (2002) Candidate strategy and the decision to go negative? Political Research Quarterly 55 (3): 669–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, M.L. and Ferrantino, M. (1996) Towards a positive theory of political rhetoric: Why do politicians lie? Public Choice 88 (1–2): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Druckman, J.N., Kifer, M.J. and Parkin, M. (2009) Campaign communications in US congressional elections. American Political Science Review 103 (3): 343–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2008) Negative campaigning in a multiparty system. Representation 31 (4): 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elmelund-Præstekær, C. (2010) Beyond American negativity: Toward a general understanding of the determinants of negative campaigning. European Political Science Review 2 (1): 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gabel, M.J. and Huber, J. (2000) Putting parties in their place. American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geer, J. (2006) In Defense of Negativity: Attack Ads in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hale, J.F., Fox, J.C. and Farmer, R. (1996) Negative advertisements in US senate campaigns: The influence of campaign context. Social Science Quarterly 77 (2): 229–343.Google Scholar
  18. Hansen, K. and Tue Pedersen, R. (2008) Negative campaigning in a multiparty system. Scandinavian Political Studies 31 (4): 229–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haynes, A. and Rhine, S.L. (1998) Attack politics in presidential nomination campaigns: An examination of the frequency and determinants of intermediated negative campaigns against opponents. Political Research Quarterly 51 (3): 691–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jamieson, K.H. (1992) Dirty Politics: Deception, Distraction and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson-Cartee, K.S., Copeland, G. and Johnson, E.E. (1991) Negative Advertising: Coming of Age. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Kahn, K.F. and Kenney, P.J. (2004) When do candidates go negative? In: L.L. Kaid and C. Holtz-Bacha (eds.) No Holds Barred: Negativity in US Senate Campaigns. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, pp. 19–37.Google Scholar
  23. Kaid, L.L. and Holtz-Bacha, C. (2006) The Sage Handbook of Political Advertising. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Kleinnijenhuis, J. and Takens, J. (2011) Het politieke nieuwsaanbod van dagbladen en televisie: Objectief en pluriform? In: J. Thomassen and R. Andeweg (eds.) Democratie Doorgelicht. Het functioneren van de Nederlandse Democratie. Leiden, the Netherlands: Leiden University Press, pp. 407–424.Google Scholar
  25. Laver, M. and Schofield, N. (1998) Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lau, R.R. and Pomper, G.M. (2004) Negative Campaigning: An Analysis of US Senate Elections. Lanham. MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  27. Lau, R.R., Sigelman, L., Heldman, C. and Babbit, P. (1999) The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytical review. American Political Science Review 93 (4): 851–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lau, R.R., Sigelman, L. and Rovner, I.B. (2007) The effects of negative political campaigns: A meta-analytical reassessment. Journal of Politics 69 (4): 1167–1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Maas, C.J.M. and Hox, J.J. (2005) Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology 1 (3): 85–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mair, P. (1996) Party systems and structures of competition. In: L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds.) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, pp. 83–106.Google Scholar
  32. Mark, D. (2006) Going Dirty: The Art of Negative Campaigning. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  33. Mayer, W.G. (1996) In defense of negative campaigning. Political Science Quarterly 111 (3): 437–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mediawet. (2008) Wet van 29 december 2008. tot Vaststelling van een Nieuwe Mediawet. Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 548: 1–79.Google Scholar
  35. Pierce, R. (1999) Mass-Elite Issue Linkages and the Responsible Party Model of Representation. In: W. Miller et al. (eds.) Policy Representation in Western Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–32.Google Scholar
  36. Plasser, F. and Plasser, G. (2002) Global Political Campaigning: A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  37. Prior, M. (2001) Weighted content analysis of political advertisements. Political Communication 18 (3): 335–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sartori, G. (1976/2005) Parties and Party Systems: A Framework of Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Scammell, M. (1997) The wisdom of the war room: US campaigning and Americanization. Research Paper, pp. 1–17. Cambridge: Presidents and Fellows Harvard College.Google Scholar
  40. Sigelman, L. and Buell, E.H. (2003) You take the high road and i’ll take the low road? The interplay of attack strategies and tactics in presidential campaigns. Journal of Politics 65 (2): 518–531.Google Scholar
  41. Sjöblom, G. (1968) Party Strategies in a Multiparty System. Lund, Sweden: Studentliteratur.Google Scholar
  42. Skaperdas, S. and Grofman, B. (1995) Modeling negative campaigning. American Political Science Review 89 (1): 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strøm, K. and Müller, W. (eds.) (1999) Political parties and hard choices. In: Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Theilmann, J. and Wilhite, A. (1998) Campaign tactics and the decision to attack. Journal of Politics 60 (4): 1050–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Praag, P. (2007) De verkiezingscampagne: Professioneler en feller. In: K. Aarts, H. van der Kolk and M. Rosema (eds.) Een verdeeld Electoraat: De Tweede Kamerverkiezingen van 2006. Utrecht, the Netherlands: Het Spectrum, pp. 97–119.Google Scholar
  46. Van Praag, P. (2005) De veranderende Nederlandse campagnecultuur. In: K. Brants and P. van Praag (eds.) Politiek en Media in Verwarring: De Verkiezingscampagnes in het Lange Jaar 2002. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Het Spinhuis, pp. 21–43.Google Scholar
  47. Van Praag, Jr P. (1991) Strategie en Illusie: Elf jaar intern debat in de PvdA (1966–1977). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
  48. Van Heerde-Hudson, J. (2011) The Americanization of British party advertising? Negativity in party election broadcasts, 1964–2005. British Politics 6 (1): 52–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Warwick, P.V. (1996) Coalition government membership in West European parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science 26 (4): 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woldendorp, J.J., Keman, H. and Budge, I. (2000) Party government in 48 democracies (1945–2008): Composition-Duration-Personnel. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication ScienceVU University of Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Political Science/AISSRUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations