Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 400–424 | Cite as

The Fortuyn Effect revisited: How did the LPF affect the Dutch parliamentary party system?

  • Simon Otjes
Original Article

Abstract

The List Pim Fortuyn (LPF) is a key example of a family of new right-wing parties that, according to many observers, have had a strong effect on European party systems. This article studies the effect of the entry of the LPF into the Dutch Parliament on the parliamentary party system. The article looks at two aspects of the party system: first, did the LPF affect the issue agenda of the legislature? And second, has the LPF been able to create a new significant line of conflict in the legislature, as Kriesi and Frey and Pellikaan et al observed for the electoral arena? Or, as Van der Brug and Bale have proposed, is the Dutch party system after Fortuyn essentially one-dimensional? The study looks at new, behavioral, data from the Dutch legislature: parliamentary voting behavior and the sponsorship of motions, to answer these questions. It employs Poole's Open Classification method to understand the patterns underlying voting behavior.

Keywords

party positions Dutch politics party systems parliamentary arena new political parties 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for the discussions at the ECPR Political Parties Standing Group Summer School (2009) and at a workshop at the ECPR Joint Sessions (2010). The comments of Peter Mair (EUI/Florence) were appreciated in particular. He wants to thank Maarten Marx for making his data available. He is also thankful for the critical comments from Rudy Andeweg, Huib Pellikaan, Tom Louwerse (Leiden University) and the anonymous reviewers of Acta Politica.

References

  1. Andeweg, R.B. and Irwin, G.A. (2005) Politics and Governance in the Netherlands. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  2. Andeweg, R.B. and Thomassen, J. (forthcoming) Pathways to party unity; sanctions, loyalty, homogeneity and division of labour in the Dutch parliament. Party Politics, in press.Google Scholar
  3. Bale, T. (2003) Cinderella and her ugly sisters: The mainstream and extreme right in Europe's bipolarising party system. West European Politics 26 (3): 67–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bardi, L. and Mair, P. (2006) The parameters of party systems. Party Politics 14 (2): 147–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bovens, M., Pellikaan, H. and Trappenburg, M. (1998) Nieuwe Tegenstellingen in de Nederlandse Politiek. In: M. Bovens, H. Pellikaan and M. Trappenburg (eds.) Nieuwe Tegenstellingen in de Nederlandse Politiek. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Boom, pp. 7–14.Google Scholar
  6. Clinton, J.D. (2007) Lawmaking and roll calls. Journal of Politics 69 (2): 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Beus, J., van Doorn, J. and de Rooy, P. (1993) De ideologische driehoek. Nederlandse politiek in historisch perspectief. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Boom.Google Scholar
  8. De Vries, J. and van der Lubben, S. (2004) Een onderbroken evenwicht in de Nederlandse politiek: Paars II en de revolte van Fortuyn. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Van Gennep.Google Scholar
  9. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  10. Hix, S. and Noury, A. (2007) Government-opposition or left-right? The institutional determinants of voting in fourteen parliaments. London, UK: London School of Economics, mimeo.Google Scholar
  11. Holzhacker, R. (2002) National parliamentary scrutiny over EU issues – Comparing the goals and methods of governing and opposition parties. European Union Politics 3 (4): 339–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hug, S. (1997) Altering Party Systems. Strategic Behaviour and the Emergence of New Political Parties in Western Democracies. Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  13. Inglehart, R. (1984) The changing structure of political cleavages in Western society. In: R.J. Dalton, S.C. Flanagan and A. Beck (eds.) Electoral Change. Realignment and Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kriesi, H. and Frey, T. (2008) The Netherlands: A challenge that was slow in coming. In: H. Kriesi, E. Grande, R. Lacat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier and T. Frey (eds.) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 154–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Krouwel, A. and Lucardie, P. (2008) Waiting in the wings: New parties in the Netherlands. Acta Politica 43 (2–3): 278–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laver, M. (2006) Legislatures and parliaments in comparative context. In: B.R. Weingast and D.A. Wittman (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Louwerse, T. (forthcoming) The spatial approach to the party mandate. Parliamentary Affairs, in press.Google Scholar
  18. Lucardie, P. (2008) The Netherlands: Populism versus pillarization. In: D. Albertazzi and D. McDonnel (eds.) Twenty-first Century Populism. The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mair, P. (1997a) E.E. Schattschneider's The Semi Sovereign People. Political Studies 45 (5): 947–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mair, P. (1997b) Party System Change: Approaches and Interpretations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Mair, P. (2001) The green challenge and political competition: How typical is the German experience. Continuity and Change in German Politics 10 (2): 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mair, P. (2007) Left-right orientations. In: R.J. Dalton and H.D. Klingeman (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour. Oxford: University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Mair, P. (2008) Electoral volatility and the Dutch party system: A comparative perspective. Acta Politica 43 (2–3): 235–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marx, M. and Schuth, A. (2010) DutchParl. A Corpus of Parliamentary Documents in Dutch, Proceedings Language Resources and Evaluation LREC 2010; 19–21. Valletta, Malta: European Language Resources Association.Google Scholar
  25. Meguid, B.M. (2005) Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review 99 (3): 347–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Norris, P. (2005) Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. NRC Handelsblad. (2007) Balkenende-IV gaat piepend en schurend de kerst in. 22 December, p. 3.Google Scholar
  28. Pellikaan, H., de Lange, S.L. and van der Meer, T. (2007) Fortuyn's legacy: Party system change in the Netherland. Comparative European Politics 5 (3): 282–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Poole, K.T. (2005) Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Poole, K.T. and Rosenthal, H. (2007) Ideology and Congress. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Rochon, T.R. (1985) Mobilizers and challengers: Towards a theory of new party success. International Political Science Review 6 (4): 419–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rosenthal, H. and Voeten, E. (2004) Analyzing roll calls with perfect spatial voting: France 1946–1958. American Journal of Political Science 48 (3): 620–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schattschneider, E.E. (1960) The Semi-sovereign People. A Realist's view on Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rhineheart and Winston.Google Scholar
  34. Tahk, A. (2010) Properties of ideal-point estimators. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Summer Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology; 22–24 July, Iowa City.Google Scholar
  35. Van der Brug, W. (1997) Where's the party? PhD thesis. University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  36. Van der Brug, W. (2008) Een crisis van de partijendemocratie? Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Brug, W. and van Spanje, J. (2009) Immigration, Europe and the ‘New’ cultural cleavage. European Journal of Political Research 48 (3): 309–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Van Spanje, J. (2010) Contagious parties. Anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties’ immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics 16 (5): 563–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Walgrave, S., Varone, F. and Dumont, P. (2006) Policy with or without parties? A comparative analysis of policy priorities and policy changes in Belgium, 1991 to 2000. Journal of European Public Policy 13 (7): 1021–1038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon Otjes
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Political Science, Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations