Acta Politica

, Volume 46, Issue 3, pp 261–293 | Cite as

Examining the effects of political information and intervention stages on public support for military interventions: A panel experiment

  • Cigdem V Sirin
Original Article
First Online:

Abstract

This study examines the formation and continuity of public support for military interventions as a function of political information levels and intervention stages using a panel experiment. The results demonstrate that politically informed individuals express less support for a military intervention at the beginning of that intervention compared to uninformed ones. However, as the intervention proceeds and casualties are incurred, the support of politically uninformed people decreases at a higher rate than does the support of the politically informed. As such, politically informed individuals demonstrate more stable levels of support across intervention stages. In addition, success or failure of an intervention at a certain stage interacts with the level of political information. Most notably, a decrease in support is significantly more pronounced among politically uninformed individuals compared to informed ones under deteriorating intervention conditions. Nevertheless, as the duration of the intervention gets longer, the level of support drops even with improving prospects while the impact of political information disappears. I also find that policy-specific information has a greater effect on public support for military interventions compared to general political information.

Keywords

political information military interventions public opinion experimentation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Almond, G.A. (1960) The American People and Foreign Policy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  2. Althaus, S.L. (1998) Information effects in collective preferences. American Political Science Review 92 (3): 545–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baines, P. and Worcester, R.M. (2005) When the British ‘Tommy’ went to war, public opinion followed. Journal of Public Affairs 5 (1): 4–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barabas, J. and Jerit, J. (2009) Estimating the causal effects of media coverage on policy-specific knowledge. American Journal of Political Science 53 (1): 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartels, L.M. (1993) Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review 87 (2): 267–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartels, L.M. (2003) Democracy with attitudes. In: M.B. MacKuen and G. Rabinowitz (eds.) Electoral Democracy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 48–82.Google Scholar
  7. Baum, M.A. (2002) The constituent foundations of the rally-round-the-flag phenomenon. International Studies Quarterly 46 (2): 263–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baum, M.A. (2003) Soft News Goes to War: Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy in the New Media Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Baum, M.A. and Kernell, S. (2001) Economic class and popular support for Franklin Roosevelt in war and peace. Public Opinion Quarterly 65 (2): 198–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, S.E. (1994) The Persian Gulf War's impact on Americans’ political information. Political Behavior 16 (2): 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennett, W.L. and Paletz, D.L. (eds.) (1994) Taken by Storm: The Media, Public Opinion and US Foreign Policy in the Gulf War. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Berinsky, A.J. (2007) Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict. Journal of Politics 69 (4): 975–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brody, R.A. and Shapiro, C.R. (1989) A reconsideration of the rally phenomenon in public opinion. In: S. Long (ed.) Political Behavior Annual, Vol.2. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 77–102.Google Scholar
  14. Burk, J. (1999) Public support for peacekeeping in Lebanon and Somalia: Assessing the casualties hypothesis. Political Science Quarterly 114 (1): 53–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Converse, P.E. (1964) The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In: D.E. Apter (ed.) Ideology and Discontent. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 206–261.Google Scholar
  16. Curran, J., Iyengar, S., Lund, A.B. and Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009) Media system, public knowledge and democracy: A comparative study. European Journal of Communication 24 (1): 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Delli Carpini, X.M. and Keeter, S. (1996) What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dimock, M. and Popkin, S. (1997) Political knowledge in comparative perspective. In: S. Iyengar and R. Reeves (eds.) Do the Media Govern? Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, pp. 217–224.Google Scholar
  19. Dixon, P. (2000) Britain's ‘Vietnam syndrome’? Public opinion and British military intervention from Palestine to Yugoslavia. Review of International Studies 26 (1): 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eichenberg, R.C. (2005) Victory has many friends: US public opinion and the use of military force, 1981–2005. International Security 30 (1): 140–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eichenberg, R.C. (2007) Citizen opinion on foreign policy and world politics. In: R.J. Dalton and H. Klingemann (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 383–401.Google Scholar
  22. Feaver, P.D. and Gelpi, C. (2004) Choosing Your Battles: American Civil-Military Relations and the Use of Force. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Filson, D. and Werner, S. (2002) A bargaining model of war and peace: Anticipating the onset, duration, and outcome of war. American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 819–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gartner, S.S. (2008) The multiple effects of casualties on public support for war: An experimental approach. American Political Science Review 102 (1): 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gartner, S.S., Segura, G.M. and Barratt, B.A. (2004) Casualties, positions, and senate elections in the Vietnam War. Political Research Quarterly 53 (3): 467–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gelpi, C., Feaver, P.D. and Reifler, J. (2005/06) Success matters: Casualty sensitivity and the war in Iraq. International Security 30 (3): 7–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gilboa, E. (2005) The CNN effect: The search for a communication theory of international relations. Political Communication 22 (1): 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gilens, M. (2001) Political ignorance and collective policy preferences. American Political Science Review 95 (2): 379–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goemans, H.E. (2000) War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goetze, C. (2008) When democracies go to war: Public debate and the French decision on war in 1999 and 2003. Global Society 22 (1): 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gomez, B.T. and Wilson, J.M. (2003) Causal attribution and economic voting in American congressional elections. Political Research Quarterly 56 (3): 271–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goren, P. (2001) Core principles and policy reasoning in mass publics: A test of two theories. British Journal of Political Science 31 (1): 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graber, D.A. (2002) Mass Media and American Politics. Washington DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hallin, D.C. (1986) The ‘Uncensored War’: The Media and Vietnam. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Holsti, O.R. (1996) Public Opinion and American Foreign Policy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  36. Howe, P. (2006) Political knowledge and electoral participation in the Netherlands: Comparisons with the Canadian case. International Political Science Review 27 (2): 137–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hurwitz, J. and Peffley, M. (1987) How are foreign policy attitudes structured? A hierarchical model. American Political Science Review 81 (4): 1099–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hutchings, V.L. (2003) Public Opinion and Democratic Accountability. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Iyengar, S. (1990) Shortcuts to political knowledge: The role of selective attention and accessibility. In: J.A. Ferejohn and J.H. Kuklinski (eds.) Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, pp. 160–185.Google Scholar
  40. Iyengar, S., Hahn, K.S., Bonfadelli, H. and Marr, M. (2009) Dark areas of ignorance revisited: Comparing international affairs knowledge in Switzerland and the US. Communication Research 36 (3): 341–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Iyengar, S. and Kinder, D.R. (1987) News That Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Jakobsen, P.V. (2000) Focus on the CNN effect misses the point: The real media impact on conflict management is invisible and indirect. Journal of Peace Research 37 (2): 131–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jaros, D., Sigelman, L. and Conover, P.J. (1982) Sophistication and foreign-policy preferences: The Iranian hostage crisis. Polity 15 (1): 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jentleson, B.W. (1992) The pretty prudent public: Post post-Vietnam American opinion on the use of military force. International Studies Quarterly 36 (1): 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jentleson, B.W. and Britton, R.L. (1998) Still pretty prudent: Post-cold war American public opinion on the use of military force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42 (4): 395–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jerit, J., Barabas, J. and Bolsen, T. (2006) Citizens, knowledge, and the information environment. American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 266–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kennan, G. (1993) Somalia, through a glass darkly. The New York Times 30 September.Google Scholar
  48. Kinder, D.R. and Palfrey, T.R. (1993) On behalf of experimental political science. In: D.R. Kinder and T.R. Palfrey (eds.) Experimental Foundations of Political Science. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Klarevas, L. (2002) The ‘essential domino’ of military operations: American public opinion and the use of force. International Studies Perspectives 3 (4): 417–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kohut, A., Toth, R. and Bowman, C. (1994) Mixed Messages about Press Freedom on both Sides of the Atlantic. Washington DC: Pew Research Center for the People and the Press.Google Scholar
  51. Krause, G.A. (1997) Voters, information heterogeneity, and the dynamics of aggregate economic expectations. American Journal of Political Science 41 (4): 1170–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Krosnick, J.A. (1990) Government policy and citizen passion: A study of issue publics in contemporary America. Political Behavior 12 (1): 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Krosnick, J.A., Boninger, D.S., Chaung, Y.C., Berent, M.K. and Carnot, C.G. (1993) Attitude strength: One construct or many related constructs? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 (6): 1132–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kull, S., Destler, I.M. and Ramsay, C. (1997) The Foreign Policy Gap: How Policymakers Misread the Public. College Park, MD: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  55. Kull, S., Ramsay, C. and Lewis, E. (2003/04) Misperceptions, the media and the Iraq war. Political Science Quarterly 118 (4): 569–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lai, B. and Reiter, D. (2005) Rally ’round the union jack? Public opinion and the use of force in the United Kingdom, 1948–2001. International Studies Quarterly 49 (2): 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Larson, E.V. (1996) Casualties and Consensus: The Historical Role of Casualties in Domestic Support for US Military Operations. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
  58. Lewis, J., Inthorn, S. and Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2005) Citizens or Consumers? What the Media Tell Us about Political Participation. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Maxwell, S.E. and Delaney, H.D. (2004) Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  60. McDermott, R. (2002) Experimental methods in political science. Annual Review of Political Science 5: 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Milner, H. (2002) Civic Literacy: How Informed Citizens Make Democracy Work. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  62. Mintz, A., Redd, S.B. and Vedlitz, A. (2006) Can we generalize from student experiments to the real world in political science, military affairs, and international relations? Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (5): 757–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mook, D.G. (1983) In defense of external invalidity. American Psychologist 38 (4): 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Morton, R. and Williams, K.C. (2010) Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Mueller, J.E. (1973) War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  66. Nacos, B.L., Shapiro, R.Y. and Pierangelo, I. (eds.) (2000) Decision-making in a Glass House: Mass Media, Public Opinion, and American and European Foreign Policy in the 21st Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  67. Neuman, W.R., Just, M.R. and Crigler, A.R. (1992) Common Knowledge: News and the Construction of Political Meaning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Nincic, M. (1992) A sensible public: New perspectives in popular opinion and foreign policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution 36 (4): 772–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Page, B. and Shapiro, R. (1992) The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Park, E. and Kosicki, G.M. (1995) Presidential support during the Iran-Contra affair: People's reasoning process and media influence. Communication Research 22 (2): 207–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Parker, S.L. (1995) Toward understanding of ‘rally’ effects: Public opinion in the Persian Gulf War. Public Opinion Quarterly 59 (4): 526–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Price, V. and Zaller, J. (1993) Who gets the news? Alternative measures of news reception and their implications for research. Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (2): 133–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Prior, M. (2002) Political knowledge after September 11. PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (3): 523–530.Google Scholar
  74. Robinson, P. (2002) The CNN Effect: The Myth of News, Foreign Policy and Intervention. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. Russett, B.M. (1990) Controlling the Sword: The Democratic Governance of National Security. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Russett, B.M. and Nincic, M. (1976) American opinion on the use of military force abroad. Political Science Quarterly 91 (3): 411–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sears, D.O. (1986) College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 515–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Seib, P. (2002) The Global Journalist: News and Conscience in a World of Conflict. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  79. Shanto, I. (1993) Agenda-setting and beyond: Television news and the strength of political issues. In: W.H. Riker (ed.) Agenda Formation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 211–219.Google Scholar
  80. Slantchev, B.L. (2004) How initiators end their wars: The duration of warfare and the terms of peace. American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 813–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stimson, J.A. (1999) Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  82. Sullivan, P.L. (2008) Sustaining the fight: A cross-sectional time-series analysis of public support for ongoing military interventions. Conflict Management and Peace Science 25 (2): 112–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Taber, C.S. and Lodge, M. (2006) Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 755–769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Willnat, L. et al (2006) Media use, anti-Americanism and international support for the Iraq war. International Communication Gazette 68 (5–6): 533–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zaller, J.R. (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cigdem V Sirin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Texas at El Paso, Benedict Hall 302, 500 W. UniversityEl PasoUSA

Personalised recommendations