Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 45, Issue 1–2, pp 1–10 | Cite as

Why you don't always get what you want: EU enlargement and civil society in Central and Eastern Europe

  • Tanja A Börzel
Introduction

It takes six months to create new political institutions, to write a constitution and electoral laws. It may take six years to create a half-way viable economy. It will probably take sixty years to create a civil society. (Ralf Dahrendorf, 1990)

The Eastern enlargement of the European Union (EU) had a profound impact on the domestic structures of the Central and Eastern European (CEE) accession countries. It had the potential for empowering civil society actors by offering new opportunities, for them to voice their interests and inject them into domestic policymaking.1Democratic conditionality and the harmonization with EU law created additional rights by safe-guarding political freedoms, by legally prescribing public involvement in the policy process and by opening new legal and political venues for civil society organizations (CSOs) to push their interests. To help the CEE countries adopt and adapt to the entire body of EU Law, the EU provided financial and technical assistance,...

References

  1. Börzel, T.A. (2009) New modes of governance and accession. The paradox of double weakness. In: T.A. Börzel (ed.) Coping with Accession to the European Union. New Modes of Environmental Governance. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bruszt, L. (2008) Multi-level governance – The eastern versions: Emerging patterns of regional development governance in the new member states. Regional and Federal Studies 18 (5): 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dahrendorf, R. (1990) Reflections on the Revolution in Europe. New York: Randem House.Google Scholar
  4. European Commission. (2001) European Governance. Brussels. A White Paper.Google Scholar
  5. Fagan, A. (2005) Taking stock of civil-society development in post-communist Europe: Evidence from the Czech republic. Democratization 12 (4): 528–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fagan, A. (2006) Transnational aid for civil society development in post-socialist Europe: Democratic consolidation or a new imperialism? Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 22 (1): 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Finke, B. (2007) Civil society participation in EU governance. Living Reviews in European Governance 2 (2), http://europeangovernance.livingreviews.org/Articles/lreg-2007-2002/.Google Scholar
  8. Goetz, K.H. (2005) The new member states and the EU: Responding to Europe. In: S. Bulmer and C. Lequesne (eds.) The Member States of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Iankova, E.A. (2009) Business, Government, and EU Accession: Strategic Partnership and Conflict. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  10. Imig, D. and Tarrow, S. (2000) Political contention in a Europeanising polity. West European Politics, Special Issue 23 (4): 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lane, D. (2007) Civil society formation in the post-socialist EU member states. In: D. Obradovic and H. Pleines (eds.) The Capacity of Central and Eastern European Interest Groups to Participate in EU Governance. Stuttgart, Germany: Ibidem-Verlag, pp. 109–127.Google Scholar
  12. Marks, G. and McAdam, D. (1996) Social movements and the changing structure of political opportunity in the European Union. In: G. Marks, F.W. Scharpf, P.C. Schmitter and W. Streeck (eds.) Governance in the European Union. London; Thousand Oaks, CA; New Delhi, India: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Obradovic, D. and Alonso Vizcaino, J.M. (2007) Good governance requirements concerning the participation of interest groups in EU consultations. In: D. Obradovic and H. Pleines (eds.) The Capacity of Central and Eastern European Interest Groups to Participate in EU Governance. Stuttgart, Germany: Ibidem Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Petrova, T. and Tarrow, S. (2007) Transactional and participatory activism in the emerging European polity. Comparative Political Studies 40 (1): 74–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sissenich, B. (2007) Building States without Societies. European Union Enlargement and the Transfer of EU Social Policy to Poland and Hungary. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  16. Trenz, H.-J. (2008) European civil society: Between participation, representation and discourse. In: U. Liebert and H.-J. Trenz (eds.) Reconstituting Democracy from below. New Approaches to Civil Society in the New Europe. Oslo, Norway: Arena.Google Scholar
  17. Vachudova, M.A. (2008) Tempered by the EU? Political parties and party systems before and after accession. Journal of European Public Policy 15 (6): 861–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanja A Börzel
    • 1
  1. 1.Otto-Suhr-Institut for Political Science, Freie Universität BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations