Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 385–409 | Cite as

Explaining policy allocation over governmental tiers by identity and functionality

  • Arjan H Schakel
Original Article

Abstract

The allocation of policies across governmental tiers varies greatly among countries. This article investigates the impact of identity and functionality pressures on the allocation of policies at the local, regional and national level. Using a data set that combines an expert survey and several country studies, this article shows that identity pressures lead to a greater concentration of policies at the regional level. The effect of identity pressures, however, is moderated by two policy characteristics. First, regional concentration is more pronounced for social–cultural policies than for economic utilities policies. Second, policies with high externalities and scale effects are less subject to regional concentration. They tend to be located at the level that seems most functionally appropriate. This is a proof that functionality bites – even in countries with strong regionalist parties.

Keywords

policy allocation identity functionality postfunctionalism decentralization theorem 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for the advice and comments of Ian Down, Anne–Marije van Essen, Imke Harbers, Adriaan Hoogendoorn, Liesbet Hooghe, Gary Marks, Menne Schakel and Wouter Schakel. Earlier versions were presented at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen, and The Hanse Wissenschaftskolleg, Delmenhorst, and the 11th Biennial International Conference of the European Union Studies Association, Los Angeles, California, 23–25 April 2009.

References

  1. Alesina, A. and Spolaore, E. (2003) The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amoretti, U.M. (2004) Italy: Political institutions and the mobilization of territorial differences. In: U.M. Amoretti and N. Bermeo (eds.) Federalism and Territorial Cleavages. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 181–200.Google Scholar
  3. Amoretti, U.M. and Bermeo, N. (eds.) (2004) Federalism and Territorial Cleavages. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Annett, A. (2001) Social fractionalization, political instability, and the size of government. IMF Staff Papers 48 (3): 561–592.Google Scholar
  5. Banting, K.G. (2005) Canada: Nation-building in a federal welfare state. In: H. Obinger, S. Leibfried and F.G. Castles (eds.) Federalism and the Welfare State: New World and European Experiences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besley, T. and Coate, S. (2003) Centralized versus decentralized provision of local public goods: A political economy approach. Journal of Public Economics 87 (5): 1611–1637.Google Scholar
  7. Brancati, D. (2006) Decentralization: Fueling the fire or dampening the flames of ethnic conflict and secessionism? International Organization 60 (3): 651–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brancati, D. (2008) The origins and strength of regional parties. British Journal of Political Science 33 (1): 135–159.Google Scholar
  9. Brusis, M. (2002) Between EU requirements, competitive politics, and national traditions: Re-creating regions in the accession countries of central and Eastern Europe. Governance 15 (4): 531–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornes, R. and Sandler, T. (1999) The Theory of Externalities, Public Goods and Club Goods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Council of Europe. (1996–2006) Structure and Operation of Local and Regional Democracy. Forty Country Reports. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe, http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/local_and_regional_democracy/documentation/library/StructureOperation/default.asp#TopOfPage, last accessed 19 October 2007.
  12. Dear, M., Fincher, R. and Curie, L. (1977) Measuring the external effects of public programs. Environment and Planning A 9 (2): 137–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Vries, M.S. (2000) The rise and fall of decentralization: A comparative analysis of arguments and practices in European countries. European Journal of Political Research 38 (2): 193–224.Google Scholar
  14. Dinan, D. (2005) Ever Closer Union. An Introduction to European Integration, 3rd edn. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Duchacek, I.D. (1970) Comparative Federalism. The Territorial Dimension of Politics. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  16. Elazar, D.J. (1987) Exploring Federalism. Tuscaloosa, AL: The University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fearon, J.D. (2003) Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 195–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Filippov, M., Ordeshook, P.C. and Shvetsova, O. (2004) Designing Federalism. A Theory of Self-Sustainable Federal Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heston, A., Summers, R. and Aten, B. (2006) Penn world table version 6.2. Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania, September 2006, http://pwt.econ.upenn.edu, last accessed 19 September 2007.
  20. Hooghe, L. (ed.) (1996) Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Building Multilevel Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hooghe, L. (2004) Belgium: Hollowing the center. In: U.M. Amoretti and N. Bermeo (eds.) Federalism and Territorial Cleavages. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press, pp. 55–92.Google Scholar
  22. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multilevel Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  23. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Schakel, A.H. (2006) Survey on Multilevel Governance and Policy Provision. Chapel Hill, NC: University of Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  24. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009a) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009b) Does efficiency shape the territorial structure of government? Annual Review of Political Science, http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/toc/polisci/forthcoming, accessed 14 March 2009.
  26. Horváth, T.M. (ed.) (2000) Decentralization: Experiments and Reforms, Vol. 1. Budapest, Hungary: Local Government and Public Sector Reform Initiative.Google Scholar
  27. Jeffery, C. (2000) Subnational mobilization and European integration: Does it make any difference? Journal of Common Market Studies 38 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kandeva, E. (ed.) (2001) Stabilization of Local Governments. Local Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, Vol. 2. Budapest, Hungary: Local Government and Public Sector Reform Initiative.Google Scholar
  29. Keating, M. (2001) Plurinational Democracy. Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Long, J.S. (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  31. Loughlin, J. and Daftary, F. (1999) Insular regions and European integration: Corsica and the Åland Islands compared. Flensburg, Germany: European Centre for Minority Issues. ECMI report 5.Google Scholar
  32. Marks, G., Salk, J., Ray, L. and Nielson, F. (1996) Competences, cracks and conflicts: Regional mobilization in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 29 (2): 164–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marshall, M.G. and Jaggers, K. (2004) Polity IV data set. [Computer file; version p4v2004]. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland, http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/polity, last accessed 19 September 2007.
  34. Munteanu, I. and Popa, V. (eds.) (2001) Developing New Rules in the Old Environment. Volume 3. Local Governments in Eastern Europe, in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Budapest, Hungary: Local Government and Public Service Reform Initiative.Google Scholar
  35. Oates, W.E. (1972) Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  36. Oates, W.E. (1999) An essay on fiscal federalism. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (3): 1120–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Page, E.C. (1991) Localism and Regionalism in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Panizza, U. (1999) On the determinants of fiscal centralization: Theory and evidence. Journal of Public Economics 74 (1): 97–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Putnam, R.D. (1993) Making Democracy Work. Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Riker, W.H. (1964) Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
  41. Schakel, A.H. (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of regional government. An inquiry into regional authority and regional policy provision. PhD dissertation, VU University, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  42. Sharpe, L.J. (ed.) (1993) The Rise of Meso Government in Europe. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Swenden, W. (2006) Federalism and Regionalism in Western Europe. A Comparative and Thematic Analysis. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  44. Ter-Minassian, T. (ed.) (1997a) Intergovernmental fiscal relations in a macroeconomic perspective: An overview. Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Washington: International Monetary Fund, pp. 3–24.Google Scholar
  45. Ter-Minassian, T. (ed.) (1997b) Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  46. Treisman, D. (2002) Defining and measuring decentralization: A global perspective. Unpublished Paper, Los Angeles, University of California, http://wwsscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/treisman/defin.pdf, last accessed 19 September 2007.
  47. Treisman, D. (2006) Explaining fiscal decentralization: Geography, colonial history, economic development and political institutions. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 44 (3): 289–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Treisman, D. (2007) The Architecture of Government: Rethinking Political Decentralization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tullock, G. (1969) Federalism: Problems of scale. Public Choice 6 (1): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Watts, R.L. (2008) Comparing Federal Systems, 3rd edn. Montreal, Canada: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Weigher, J.C. and Zerbst, R.H. (1973) The externalities of neighborhood parks: An empirical investigation. Land Economics 49 (1): 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wheare, K.C. (1963) Federal Government, 4th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arjan H Schakel
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social and Political Science, University of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations