Acta Politica

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 353–384 | Cite as

Being intolerant of the intolerant. The exclusion of Western European anti-immigration parties and its consequences for party choice

Original Article

Abstract

In various European countries established parties have responded quite differently to the recent rise of anti-immigration parties. In Italy and Austria these parties entered governing coalitions. In France and Belgium the established parties agreed never to collaborate in any way with anti-immigration parties. In this paper we aim to assess whether this strategy of exclusion affects the electoral support for anti-immigration parties. To answer the research questions, we link expert survey data to individual-level survey data and perform analyses across 11 parties and across 4 time points. We find that the effect of exclusion depends on the institutional context, in particular the threshold for entering parliament, and the influence of parliamentary opposition parties on policy-making. According to our estimates the former Flemish Bloc benefited from being excluded and the Northern League in Italy would have benefited if it had been excluded. The Danish Progress Party, on the other hand, would have been hurt if it had been excluded. The other parties in our analyses are hardly affected. To the extent that the exclusion of anti-immigration parties is meant to change electoral outcomes in favour of the established parties, its success is thus quite mixed.

Keywords

radical right anti-immigration parties defence of democracy elections niche parties 

References

  1. Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G. (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez, R.M. and Nagler, J. (1998) Economics, entitlements, and social issues: Voter choice in the 1996 presidential election. American Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 1349–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Art, D. (2006) The Politics of the Nazi Past in Germany and Austria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Austen-Smith, D. (1983) The spatial theory of electoral competition: Instability, institutions, and information. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 1 (4): 439–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Backes, U. and Mudde, C. (2000) Germany: Extremism without successful parties. Parliamentary Affairs 53 (3): 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Betz, H.G. (1998) Against Rome: The lega nord. In: H.G. Betz and S. Immerfall (eds.) The New Politics of the Right: Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brambor, T., Clark, W. and Golder, M. (2006) Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brennan, G. and Hamlin, A. (1998) Expressive voting and electoral equilibrium. Public Choice 95: 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bull, M.J. and Newell, J.L. (1995) Italy changes course? The 1994 elections and the victory of the right. Parliamentary Affairs 48 (1): 72–99.Google Scholar
  11. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. and Stokes, D.E. (1960) The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  12. Carter, E. (2005) The Extreme Right in Western Europe: Success or Failure? Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Damen, S. (1999) Het Cordon Sanitaire Rond Het Vlaams Blok Gewikt en Gewogen. Antwerp, Belgium: Department of Political and Social Science, University of Antwerp.Google Scholar
  14. Damen, S. (2001) Strategieën tegen extreem-rechts: Het cordon sanitaire onder de loep. Tijdschrift voor Sociologie 22 (1): 89–110.Google Scholar
  15. De Witte, H. (1997) Een overzicht en evaluatie van strategieen ter bestrijding van extreem-rechtse partijen. In: H.D. Witte (ed.) Bestrijding van Racisme en Rechts-Extremisme Wetenschappelijke Bijdragen Aan het Maatschappelijk Debat. Louvain, Belgium: Acco.Google Scholar
  16. Delwit, P. and De Waele, J.M. (1998) Les partis politiques et la montée de l’extreme droite en Communauté francaise de Belgique. In: P. Delwit, J.M. De Waele and A. Rea (eds.) L’Extrême droite en France et Belgique. Brussels, Belgium: Éditions Complexe.Google Scholar
  17. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  18. Downs, W. (2001) Pariahs in their midst: Belgian and Norwegian parties react to extremist threats. West European Politics 24 (3): 23–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Downs, W. (2002) How effective is the cordon sanitaire? Lessons from efforts to contain the far right in Belgium, France, Denmark and Norway. Journal für Konflikt- und Gewaltforschung 4 (1): 32–51.Google Scholar
  20. Enelow, J.M. and Hinich, M.J. (1984) The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ezrow, L. (2008) On the inverse relationship between votes and proximity for niche parties. European Journal of Political Research 47: 206–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fennema, M. (1997) Some conceptual issues and problems in the comparison of anti-immigrant parties in western Europe. Party Politics 3: 473–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Franklin, M.N., Mackie, T. and Valen, H. (1992) Electoral Change. Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Givens, T.E. (2005) Voting Radical Right in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Green, D.P. and Shapiro, I. (1994) Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory. A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Greene, K.V. and Nelson, P.J. (2002) If extremists vote how do they express themselves? An empirical test of an expressive theory of voting. Public Choice 113 (3–4): 425–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hainsworth, P. (2000) The front national: From ascendancy to fragmentation on the French extreme right. In: P. Hainsworth (ed.) The Politics of the Extreme Right. From the Margins to the Mainstream. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  28. Husbands, C.T. (1992) The Netherlands: Irritants on the body politic. In: P. Hainsworth (ed.) The Extreme Right in Europe and the USA. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  29. Ignazi, P. (2003) Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ivarsflaten, E. (2005) The vulnerable populist right parties: No economic realignment fuelling their electoral success. European Journal of Political Research 44 (3): 465–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Janssens, P. (2000) Het cordon sanitaire moet waterdicht blijven. Streven 67: 681–686.Google Scholar
  32. Kestel, L. and Godmer, L. (2004) Institutional inclusion and exclusion of extreme-right parties in Austria, Germany and France. In: R. Eatwell and C. Mudde (eds.) Western Democracies and the New Extreme Right Challenge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Kestilä, E. (2006) Is there demand for radical right populism in the Finnish electorate? Scandinavian Political Studies 29 (3): 169–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kritzinger, S., Klemmensen, R. and Chari, R. (2004) Party leadership and party cohesion: determining factors of ‘government participation’ and incumbency success of right-wing parties? Paper read at ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
  35. Kroh, M. (2003) Parties, Politicians, and Policies: Orientations of Vote Choice Across Voters and Contexts. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  36. Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B. and Gaudet, H. (1948) The People's Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Lubbers, M. (2001) Exclusionistic Electorates: Extreme Right-Wing Voting in Western Europe. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: ICS Dissertations.Google Scholar
  38. Lubbers, M. and Scheepers, P. (2001) Explaining the trend in extreme right-wing voting: Germany 1989–1998. European Sociological Review 17 (4): 431–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lubbers, M., Gijsberts, M. and Scheepers, P. (2002) Extreme right-wing voting in western Europe. European Journal of Political Research 41 (3): 345–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lucardie, P. (1998) The Netherlands: The extremist center parties. In: H.G. Betz and S. Immerfall (eds.) The New Politics of the Right: Neo-populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  41. Macdonald, S.E., Listhaug, O. and Rabinowitz, G. (1991) Issues and party support in multiparty systems. American Political Science Review 85: 1107–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maddens, B. and Fiers, S. (1998) Les partis flamands face au poids du Vlaams Blok. In: P. Delwit, J.M. De Waele and A. Rea (eds.) L’Extrême droite en France et en Belgique. Brussels, Belgium: Éditions Complexe.Google Scholar
  43. Meguid, B. (2005) Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review 99 (3): 435–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Minkenberg, M. and Schain, M. (2003) The front national in context: French and European dimensions. In: P. Merkl and L. Weinberg (eds.) Right-Wing Extremism in the Twenty-First Century. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
  45. Mudde, C. and van Holsteyn, J. (2000) The Netherlands: Explaining the limited success of the extreme right. In: P. Hainsworth (ed.) The Politics of the Extreme Right: From the Margins to the Mainstream. London/New York: Pinter.Google Scholar
  46. Nannestad, P. and Paldam, M. (2002) The cost of ruling: A foundation stone for two theories. In: H. Dorussen and M. Taylor (eds.) Economic Voting. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  47. Paldam, M. (1986) The distribution of election results and the two explanations of the cost of ruling. European Journal of Political Economy 2: 5–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Powell, G.B. and Whitten, G.D. (1993) A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riedlsperger, M. (1998) The freedom party of Austria: From protest to radical right populism. In: H.G. Betz and S. Immerfall (eds.) The New Politics of the Right: Neo-Populist Parties and Movements in Established Democracies. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
  50. Rose, R. and Mackie, T. (1983) Incumbency in government: Asset or liability? In: H. Daalder and P. Mair (eds.) Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  51. Rydgren, J. (2004) Explaining the emergence of radical right-wing populist parties: The case of Denmark. West European Politics 27 (3): 474–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schikhof, M. (1998) Strategieen tegen extreem-rechts en hun gevolgen. In: C. Mudde and J.J.M. van Holsteyn (eds.) Extreem-rechts in Nederland. The Hague, The Netherlands: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
  53. Shepsle, K.A. (1991) Models of Multiparty Electoral Competition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  54. Simon, H.A. (1985) The dialogue of psychology with political science. American Political Science Review 79: 293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Stimson, J.A. (1985) Regression in space and time: A statistical essay. American Journal of Political Science 29: 914–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Strøm, K. (1990) Minority Government and Majority Rule. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Sundberg, J. and Wilhelmsson, N. (2004) Moving from government to government: The transformation of the Finnish greens. Paper read at ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops; 13–18 April 2004, Uppsala.Google Scholar
  58. Swyngedouw, M., Billiet, J., Carton, A. and Beerten, R. (1998) De (on)redelijke kiezer. Onderzoek naar de politieke opvattingen van Vlamingen. Verkiezingen van 21 mei 1995. Louvain, Belgium: Acco.Google Scholar
  59. Tillie, J. (1995) Party Utility and Voting Behaviour. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
  60. Van der Brug, W. (1997) Where's the Party? Voters’ Perceptions of Party Positions, Department of Political Science. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  61. Van der Brug, W. and Fennema, M. (2003) Protest or mainstream? How the European anti-immigrant parties developed into two separate groups by 1999. European Journal of Political Research 42 (1): 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M. and Tillie, J. (2000) Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest vote? European Journal of Political Research 37: 77–102.Google Scholar
  63. Van der Eijk, C. (2002) Design issues in electoral research: Taking care of (core) business. Electoral Studies 21 (2): 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M.N. (1996a) Choosing Europe?: The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M.N. (1996b) Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Van der Eijk, C. and Kroh, M. (2002) Alchemy or science? Discrete choice models for analyzing voter choice in multi-party contests. Paper read at APSA Annual Conference, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  67. Van der Eijk, C., Franklin, M. and Van der Brug, W. (1999) Policy preferences and party choice. In: H. Schmitt and J. Thomassen (eds.) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Van der Eijk, C., van der Brug, W., Kroh, M. and Franklin, M. (2006) Rethinking the dependent variable in electoral behavior – On the measurement and analysis of utilities. Electoral Studies.Google Scholar
  69. Van Donselaar, J. (1995) De staat paraat? De bestrijding van extreem-rechts in West-Europa. The Hague, The Netherlands: Babylon-De Geus.Google Scholar
  70. Van Praag, P. (2005) De veranderende Nederlandse campagnecultuur. In: K. Brants and P.V. Praag (eds.) Politiek en media in verwarring. De verkiezingscampagnes in het lange jaar 2002. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
  71. Van Spanje, J. and van der Brug, W. (2007) The party as pariah: The exclusion of anti-immigration parties and its effect on their ideological positions. West European Politics 30 (5): 1022–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Villalba, B. (1998) L’esquive. La gauche et la droite face au front national. In: P. Delwit, J.M. De Waele and A. Rea (eds.) L’Extrême droite en France et en Belgique. Brussels, Belgium: Éditions Complexe.Google Scholar
  73. Westholm, A. (1997) Distance versus direction: The illusory defeat of the proximity theory of electoral choice. American Political Science Review 91: 865–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Whitten, G.D. and Palmer, H.D. (1996) Heightening comparativists concern for model choice – Voting behavior in Great Britain and the Netherlands. American Journal of Political Science 40: 231–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European University InstituteItaly
  2. 2.ASCoR, University of AmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.ASSR, University of AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations