Acta Politica

, Volume 45, Issue 1–2, pp 136–157 | Cite as

The European Union as political resource: NGOs as change agents?

  • Imogen Sudbery
Original Article

Abstract

A number of Europeanization scholars maintain that accession to the European Union (EU) provides non-state actors with new opportunities to strengthen their position in the opportunity structure, even in areas where there is no clear EU policy or law-exerting pressure from above. However, to date there has been little research focusing on whether non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Central and Eastern Europe have been able to use the EU in this way. In order to address this gap, this article considers whether, how and to what effect Polish women's rights organizations have deployed four types of EU political resource: arenas, policy instruments, funding programmes and points of reference. The research question is analyzed through two different case studies: one on equality in the workplace, where there is a strong EU competence, and one on sexual and reproductive health and rights, where there is no EU competence. The case studies find that the use of EU resources did empower these organisations domestically, but to a lesser extent than expected, particularly where there was no EU pressure from above. In areas where the EU offers the greatest opportunities it also imposes constraints.

Keywords

Europeanization civil society gender equality Central and Eastern Europe EU enlargement women's rights organizations 

References

  1. Börzel, T. and Risse, T. (2000) When Europe hits home: Europeanization and domestic change. European Integration Online Papers 4/15, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2000-015a.htm.
  2. Bystydzienski, J. (2001) The feminist movement in Poland: Why so slow? Women's Studies International Forum 24 (5): 501–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Caporaso, J., Cowles, M.G. and Risse, T. (eds.) (2001) Transforming Europe: Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Dimitrova, A. (2002) Enlargement, institution-building and the EU s administrative capacity requirement. West European Politics 25 (4): 171–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fodor, E., Glass, C., Kawachi, J. and Popescu, L. (2002) Family and gender in Hungary, Poland and Romania. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 35: 475–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gal, S. and Kligman, G. (2000) The Politics of Gender After Socialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Grabbe, H. (1999) A Partnership for Accession? The Implications of EU Conditionality for the Central and East European applicants. San Domenico di Fiesole (FI): European University Institute. EUI Working Paper RSC No. 99/12.Google Scholar
  8. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multi-level Governance and European Integration. Lanham/Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Imig, D. and Tarrow, S. (2001) Contentious Europeans: Protest and Politics in an Emerging Polity. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  10. Interview CEI. (2008) Interview with a representative of the Polish Committee on European Integration. 18 April, Lodz.Google Scholar
  11. Interview CPM. (2009) Interview with a representative of the Chancellery of the Prime Minister. 19 June, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  12. Interview FWFP. (2008) Interview with a representative of the Federation for Women and Family Planning. 15 April, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  13. Interview HB. (2009) Interview with a representative of the Heinrich Boell Foundation. 19 June, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  14. Interview IPPF EN. (2008) Interview with a representative of the International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network. 18 September, Brussels.Google Scholar
  15. Interview KC. (2008) Interview with a representative of the Karat Coalition. 16 April, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  16. Interview LGI. (2008) Interview with a representative of the Lodz Gender Institute. 18 April, Lodz.Google Scholar
  17. Interview MLSP. (2009) Interview with a representative of the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs. 18 June, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  18. Interview UN. (2008) Interview with a representative of UNDP. 15 April, Warsaw, Poland.Google Scholar
  19. Interview WRC. (2008) Interview with a representative of the Women's Rights Centre. 14 April, Warsaw.Google Scholar
  20. Jacquot, S. and Woll, C. (2003) Usage of European Integration – Europeanisation from a Sociological Perspective. European Integration online Papers (EIoP) 7/2003, http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2003-012a.htm.
  21. Keck, M.E. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists beyond Borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kitschelt, H. (1986) Political opportunity structures and political protest: Anti-nuclear movements in four democracies. British Journal of Political Science 16: 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kohler-Koch, B. (2005) European Governance and System Integration. European Governance Paper, EUROGOV No C-01-05.Google Scholar
  24. Kriesi, H. (2004) Political context and opportunity. In: S. Snow, S.A. Soule and H. Kriesi (eds.) Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell, pp. 67–91.Google Scholar
  25. Liebert, U. (2003) Explaining Europeanisation: A Mechanisms Based Approach. Diskussionspapier zur Tagung ‘Forschungslogik und Methodik in den Internationalen Beziehungen und der Europaforschung’, Evangelische Akademie Hofgeismar, 2–4 April.Google Scholar
  26. Radaelli, C.M. (2003) Europeanisation of public policy. In: K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Radaelli, C.M. (2004) Europeanisation: Problem or solution? European Integration Online Papers, (EIoP), 8:16, http://www.eiop.or.at.
  28. Schmidt, V. and Radaelli, C. (2004) Policy change and discourse in Europe. West European Politics 27 (2): 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vachudova, M. (2001) The Leverage of International Institutions on Democratizing States: Eastern Europe and the European Union. EUI Working Paper 2001/33.Google Scholar
  30. Zubek, R. (2001) A core in check: The transformation of the Polish core executive. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (6): 911–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Imogen Sudbery
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Politics and International Relations, University of Dublin, BelfieldIreland

Personalised recommendations