Acta Politica

, Volume 43, Issue 2–3, pp 203–234 | Cite as

Dutch Voters and the Changing Party Space 1989–2006

  • Kees Aarts
  • Jacques Thomassen
Article

Abstract

Elections in the Netherlands in the period 1989–2006 have shown major changes in the supply of political parties and at some points a very large volatility of results. We describe these developments against the background of theories of dealignment and realignment. Specifically, we focus on the alleged rise of a new ‘cultural’ dimension of political conflict in Dutch politics at the level of the electorate. We show that the electorate's position on political issues representing the traditional conflict dimensions (left–right, religion) has been relatively stable. Since the early 1990s, new political problems have become salient for the voters. Sympathy for political parties can be modelled by three dimensions (authoritarian–libertarian, left–right, religious) which are related to the voters’ positions on political issues. These positions on issues representing traditional and new political conflict dimensions also affect voting behaviour for traditional and for new political parties.

Keywords

political parties elections voting Dutch politics political change in the Netherlands 

References

  1. Aarts, K. and Semetko, H.A. (1999) ‘Representation and responsibility’, Acta Politica 34 (2/3): 111–129.Google Scholar
  2. Aarts, K., Van der Kolk, H. and Rosema, M. (eds.) (2007) Een Verdeeld Electoraat. De Tweede Kamerverkiezingen van 2006, Utrecht: Het Spectrum.Google Scholar
  3. Bartolini, D and Mair, P. (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Caramani, D. (2004) The Nationalization of Politics: The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalton, R. (2002) Citizen Politics. Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, 3rd edn, New York: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
  6. Dalton, R., Flanagan, S. and Beck, P. (eds.) (1984) Electoral Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment?, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. De Nederlandse Kiezers in 1967 (1967) Amsterdam: Agon/Elsevier.Google Scholar
  8. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  9. Downs, A. (1972) ‘Up and down with ecology: the ‘issue attention cycle’, Public Interest 28: 39–50.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, G. (ed.) (1999) The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Franklin, M., Mackie, T. and Valen, H. (eds.) (1992) Electoral Change. Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fuchs, D. and Klingemann, H.-D. (1995) ‘Citizens and the State: A Changing Relationship?’, in H.-D. Klingemann and D. Fuchs (eds.) Citizens and the State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Inglehart, R. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Inglehart, R. and Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy. The Human Development Sequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Irwin, G. and Van Holsteyn, J. (1989a) ‘Decline of the structured model of electoral competition’, West European Politics 12 (1): 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Irwin, G. and Van Holsteyn, J. (1989b) ‘Towards a more open model of competition’, West European Politics 12 (1): 112–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaase, M. and Klingemann, H.-D. (1994) ‘Electoral research in the Federal Republic of Germany’, in J.J.A. Thomassen (ed.) The Intellectual History of Election Studies. Special Issue of the European Journal for Political Research, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  18. Key, V.O. (1966) The Responsible Electorate, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitschelt, H. (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitschelt, H. (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe — A Comparative Analysis, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  21. Knutsen, O. (1995) ‘Left-Right Materialist Value Orientations’, in J. Van Deth and E. Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Knutsen, O. and Scarbrough, E. (1995) ‘Cleavage Politics’, in J. Van Deth and E. Scarbrough (eds.) The Impact of Values, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kornhauser, W. (1960) The Politics of Mass Society, London: Routledge and Kegan.Google Scholar
  24. Kriesi, H., Grande, H., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S. and Frey, T. (2006) ‘Globalization and the transformation of the national political space; six European countries compared’, European Journal of Political Research 45: 921–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S. (1967) ‘Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments: An Introduction’, in S.H. Lipset and S. Rokkan (eds.) Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross National Perspectives, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  26. Listhaug, O., Macdonald, S.E. and Rabinowitz, G. (1990) ‘A comparative spatial analysis of European party systems’, Scandinavian Political Studies 13 (3): 227–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mair, P. (2002) ‘De Eigenaardigheden van de Nederlanders. De Verkiezingen van 2002 in een Vergelijkend Perspectief’, Beleid en Maatschappij 29 (3): 160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Marks, G. and Steenbergen, M.R. (eds.) (2004) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oskarsson, M. (2005) ‘Social Structure and Party Choice’, in J. Thomassen (ed.) The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Pellikaan, H., de Lange, S. and Van der Meer, T. (2007) ‘Fortuyn's legacy: party system change in the Netherlands’, Comparative European Politics 5: 282–302.Google Scholar
  31. Pellikaan, H., Van der Meer, T. and de Lange, S. (2003) ‘The road from a depoliticized to a centrifugal democracy’, Acta Politica 38: 23–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rabinowitz, G. (1978) ‘On the nature of political issues: insights from a spatial analysis’, American Journal of Political Science 22 (4): 793–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rose, R. and McAllister, I. (1986) Voters Begin to Choose. From Closed-Class to Open Elections in Britain, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Sani, G. and Sartori, G. (1983) ‘Polarisation, Fragmentation and Competition in Western Democracies’, in H. Daalder and P. Mair (eds.) Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, Beverly Hills/London: Sage.Google Scholar
  35. Thomassen, J.J.A. (1994) ‘Empirical Research into Political Representation: Failing Democracy or Failing Models’, in M.K. Jennings and T.E. Mann (eds.) Elections at Home and Abroad: Essays in Honor of Warren Miller, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  36. Thomassen, J.J.A. (ed.) (2005) The European Voter, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van der Eijk, C. and Niemöller, B. (1983) Electoral Change in the Netherlands. Empirical Results and Methods of Measurement, Amsterdam: CT-Press.Google Scholar
  38. Van der Eijk, C. and Niemöller, K. (1992) ‘Netherlands’, in M. Franklin, T. Mackie and H. Valen (eds.) Electoral Change. Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Van Holsteyn, J. and Irwin, G. (2004) ‘The Dutch parliamentary elections of 2003’, West European Politics 27 (1): 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Van Holsteyn, J., Irwin, G. and den Ridder, J. (2003) ‘In the eye of the beholder: the perception of the list Pim Fortuyn and the parliamentary elections of May 2002’, Acta Politica 38: 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kees Aarts
    • 1
  • Jacques Thomassen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Research MethodsUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations