Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 43, Issue 2–3, pp 235–253 | Cite as

Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: A Comparative Perspective

  • Peter Mair
Article

Abstract

This paper places the current wave of Dutch electoral volatility within a comparative European context, and emphasizes its exceptional character. Evidence of Dutch exceptionalism in terms of the broad patterns of electoral change that have developed across the post-war years is reviewed, and the focus is then narrowed to the evidence from very recent elections. One of the major factors accounting for the current high levels of volatility is the relative openness of the party system. Evidence of the patterns of government alternation shows that the Dutch party system is relatively unstructured, but it was only when depillarization was more or less complete that the real effect of this openness kicked in.

Keywords

electoral volatility Netherlands government alternation party system electoral constraint 

References

  1. Andeweg, R.B. and Irwin, G.A. (2005) Governance and Politics of the Netherlands, (2nd edn, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  2. Bartolini, S. and Mair, P. (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability, Cambridge: Cambrdge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Franklin, M.N. and Mackie, T.T. (1983) ‘Familiarity and inertia in the formation of governing coalitions in parliamentary democracies’, British Journal of Political Science 13 (3): 275–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gallagher, M., Laver, M. and Mair, P. (2005) Representative Government in Modern Europe, 4th edn, New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  5. van Holsteyn, J.J.M. (2007) ‘The Dutch Parliamentary Elections of 2006’, West European Politics 30 (5): 1139–1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. van Holsteyn, J.J.M. and Irwin, G.A. (2003) ‘Never a dull moment: Pim Fortuyn and the Dutch Parliamentary Election of 2002’, West European Politics 26 (2): 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Houska, J.J. (1985) Influencing Mass Electoral Behavior: Elites and Political Subcultures in the Netherlands and Austria, Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
  8. Irwin, G. and van Holsteyn, J.J.M. (2003) ‘They say it can't be done: Strategic voting in multi-party proportional systems: The case of the Netherlands’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  9. Keman, H. and Krouwel, A. (2007) ‘The rise of a new political class: emerging new parties and the populist challenge’, epsNET KIOSK PLUS. The NET Journal of Political Science 5 (1): 75–94.Google Scholar
  10. Koole, R. and van Praag, P. (1990) ‘Electoral competition in a segmented society: campaign strategies and the importance of elite perceptions’, European Journal of Political Research 18 (1): 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mair, P. (2002a) ‘Comparing Party Systems’, in L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds.) Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, London: Sage, pp. 88–107.Google Scholar
  12. Mair, P. (2002b) ‘De eigenaardigheden van de Nederlanders: De verkiezingen van 2002 in een vergelijkend perspectief’, Beleid & Maatschappij 29 (3): 160–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mair, P. (2003) ‘Hoe gewoon is gewoon?’ Beleid & Maatschappij 30 (2): 142–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mair, P. (2007) ‘Party Systems and Alternation in Government, 1950–2000: Innovation and Institutionalisation’, in S. Gloppen and L. Rakner (eds.) Globalisation and Democratisation: Challenges for Political Parties, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, pp. 135–153.Google Scholar
  15. Mair, P. and van Biezen, I. (2001) ‘Party membership in twenty european democracies, 1980–2000’, Party Politics 7 (1): 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Müller, W.C. and Strøm, K. (eds.) (2000) Coalition Governments in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Pedersen, M.N. (1979) ‘The dynamics of european party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility’, European Journal of Political Research 7 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pedersen, M.N. (1988) ‘The Defeat of All Parties: The Danish Folketing Election, 1973’, in K. Lawson and P.H. Merkl (eds.) When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 257–281.Google Scholar
  19. Rokkan, S. (1970) Citizens, Elections, Parties, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
  20. Rose, R. and McAllister, I. (1992) ‘Expressive Versus Instrumental Voting’, in D. Kavanagh (ed.) Electoral Politics: Essays in Honour of David Butler, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–140.Google Scholar
  21. Woldendorp, J., Keman, H. and Budge, I. (2000) Party Government in 43 Societies, Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Mair
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceEUI, Florence, and Leiden UniversityItaly

Personalised recommendations