Advertisement

The American Journal of Psychoanalysis

, Volume 73, Issue 3, pp 254–270 | Cite as

The Beginnings of Psychoanalytic Supervision: The Crucial Role of Max Eitingon

  • C Edward WatkinsJr.Email author
Article

Abstract

Psychoanalytic supervision is moving well into its 2nd century of theory, practice, and (to a limited extent) research. In this paper, I take a look at the pioneering first efforts to define psychoanalytic supervision and its importance to the psychoanalytic education process. Max Eitingon, the “almost forgotten man” of psychoanalysis, looms large in any such consideration. His writings or organizational reports were seemingly the first psychoanalytic published material to address the following supervision issues: rationale, screening, notes, responsibility, supervisee learning/personality issues, and the extent and length of supervision itself. Although Eitingon never wrote formally on supervision, his pioneering work in the area has continued to echo across the decades and can still be seen reflected in contemporary supervision practice. I also recognize the role of Karen Horney—one of the founders of the Berlin Institute and Poliklinik, friend of Eitingon, and active, vital participant in Eitingon’s efforts—in contributing to and shaping the beginnings of psychoanalytic education.

Keywords

Max Eitingon psychoanalytic supervision psychoanalytic education Berlin Poliklinik Karen Horney 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to the Editor and reviewers for their most helpful feedback on an earlier version of this manuscript. I benefited greatly from their ideas about how to expand the scope of this paper and make its content more meaningful.

References

  1. Auchincloss, E. L. & Michels, R. (2003). A reassessment of psychoanalytic education: Controversies and changes. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84 (1), 387–403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balint, M. (1948). On the psychoanalytic training system. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 29 (2), 163–173.Google Scholar
  3. Berman, E. (1997). Relational psychoanalysis: A historical background. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51 (2), 185–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Berman, E. (2000). Psychoanalytic supervision: The intersubjective development. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81 (2), 273–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bibring, E. (1937). Methods and techniques of control analysis: Report of second Four Countries Conference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 18 (4), 369–371.Google Scholar
  6. Binder, J. L. & Strupp, H. H. (1997). Supervision of psychodynamic therapies. In C.E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of Psychotherapy Supervision. (pp. 44–62). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Board on the Professional Standards of the American Psychoanalytic Association (2010). Standards for Education and Training in Psychoanalysis. New York: APA. http://www.apsa.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=yo5vqUk7jJ8%3d&tabid=219, accessed May 9, 2012.
  8. Bosworth, H., Aizaga, K. H. & Cabaniss, D. L. (2009). The training analyst: Analyst, teacher, mentor. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57 (3), 663–675.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brill, A. A. (1943). Max Eitingon. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 12 (3), 456–457.Google Scholar
  10. Cabaniss, D. L. & Bosworth, H. (2006). The aim of the training analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 54 (1), 203–229.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cabaniss, D. L., Glick, R. & Roose, S. (2001). The Columbia Supervision Project: Data from the dyad. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 49 (2), 235–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cabaniss, D. L., Schein, J., Glick, R. & Roose, S. (2003). Progression in analytic institutes: A multicenter study. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 84 (1), 77–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chagoya, L. & Chagoya, C. (1994). The development of a psychotherapy supervisor. In S. G. Greben & R. Ruskin (Eds.), Clinical Perspectives on Psychotherapy Supervision. (pp. 189–209). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  14. Coopersmith, S. (Ed.) (2010). Special issue: The future of the training analysis. Psychoanalytic Review, 97 (6), 899–1020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Danto, E. A. (1999). The Berlin Poliklinik: Psychoanalytic innovation in Weimar Germany. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 47 (5), 1269–1292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Danto, E. A. (2005). Freud’s Free Clinics: Psychoanalysis and Social Justice, 1918–1938. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DeWald, P. A. (1987). Learning Process in Psychoanalytic Supervision: Complexities and challenges. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  18. DeWald, P. A. (1997). The process of supervision in psychoanalysis. In C.E. Watkins, Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision. (pp. 31–43). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Doehrman, M. (1976). Parallel processes in supervision and psychotherapy. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 40 (1), 3–104.Google Scholar
  20. Dorn, R. M., Stein, H. F. & Moore, B. E. (2006). Genealogy in psychoanalytic education: Reinforced adherence or useful aids toward individuation? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23 (1), 8–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eagle, M. N. (2011). From Classical to Contemporary Psychoanalysis: A Critique and Integration. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  22. Eitingon, M. (1923). Report of the Berlin Psychoanalytical Policlinic. Bulletin of the International Psychoanalytical Association, 4 (4), 254–269.Google Scholar
  23. Eitingon, M. (1926). An address to the International Training Commission. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 7 (2), 129–135.Google Scholar
  24. Eitingon, M. (1928). Report to the International Training Commission. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 9 (2), 135–156.Google Scholar
  25. Eitingon, M. (1933). Report to the International Training Commission. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 14 (1), 155–168.Google Scholar
  26. Eitingon, M. (1935). Report of the general meeting of the International Training Commission. Bulletin of the International Psycho-Analytical Association, 16 (2), 242–262.Google Scholar
  27. Ekstein, R. & Wallerstein, R. (1958). The Teaching and Learning of Psychotherapy. New York: Basic Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ekstein, R. & Wallerstein, R. (1972). The Teaching and Learning of Psychotherapy. 2nd edn. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  29. Fine, R. (1979). A History of Psychoanalysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Fleming, J. & Benedek, T. F. (1966). Psychoanalytic Supervision: A Method of Clinical Teaching. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
  31. Fleming, J. & Benedek, T. F. (1983). Psychoanalytic Supervision: A Method of Clinical Teaching. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  32. Frank, G. (2010). A commentary on the training analysis. Psychoanalytic Review, 97 (6), 945–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Frawley-O’Dea, M. G. & Sarnat, J. E. (2001). The Supervisory Relationship: A Contemporary Psychodynamic Approach. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  34. Freud, S. (1909). Analysis of a Phobia in a Five-year-old Boy Standard Edition (Vol. 10, pp. 3–152). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  35. Freud, S. (1914). On the History of the Psycho-analytic Movement Standard Edition (Vol. 14, pp. 3–66). London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  36. Garza-Guerrero, C. (2004). Reorganisational and educational demands of psychoanalytic training today: Our long and marasmic night of one century. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 85 (1), 3–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gediman, H. K. & Wolkenfeld, F. (1980). The parallelism phenomenon in psychoanalysis and supervision: Its reconsideration as a triadic system. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 49 (2), 234–255.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Ginor, I. & Remez, G. (2012). Her son, the atomic scientist: Mirra Berens, Yuli Kharton, and Max Eitingon’s services for the Soviets. Journal of Modern Jewish Studies, 11 (1), 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hess, A. K. (2008). Psychotherapy supervision: A conceptual review. In A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess & T. H. Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy Supervision: Theory, Research, and Practice. 2nd edn. (pp. 3–22). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Horney, K. (1930). The establishment of the educational program: On organization. In: Zehn Yahre Berliner Psychoanalytisches Institut.. Vienna: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag. 48–52.Google Scholar
  41. Jacobs, D., David, P. & Meyer, D. J. (1995). The Supervisory Encounter: A Guide for Teachers of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy and Analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Jones, E. (1943). Obituary: Max Eitingon. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 24 (2), 190–192.Google Scholar
  43. Jones, E. (1955). The life and work of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 2. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Kächele, H. & Thomä, H. (2000). On the devaluation of the Eitingon–Freud model of psychoanalytic education. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82 (4), 806–808.Google Scholar
  45. Kernberg, O. (1996). Thirty methods to destroy the creativity of candidates. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 77 (8), 1031–1040.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kernberg, O. (2000). A concerned critique of psychoanalytic education. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 81 (1), 97–120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kernberg, O. (2010). A new organization of psychoanalytic education. Psychoanalytic Review, 97 (6), 997–1020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kernberg, O. (2011). Psychoanalysis and the university: A difficult relationship. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92 (3), 609–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kernberg, O., Cabaniss, D. L., Auchincloss, E. L., Glick, R. A. & Roose, S. P. (2012). Three problematic assumptions about psychoanalytic education: A brief communication. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 60 (1), 97–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kirsner, D. (2009). Unfree Associations: Inside Psychoanalytic Institutes. New York: Aronson.Google Scholar
  51. Kirsner, D. (2010). Training analysis: The shibboleth of psychoanalytic education. The Psychoanalytic Review, 97 (6), 971–995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kovacs, V. (1936). Training and control-analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 17 (3), 346–354.Google Scholar
  53. Landauer, K. (1937). Difficulties in controlling an analysis: Report of the second Four Countries Conference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 18 (3), 371.Google Scholar
  54. Lane, R. C. (Ed.) (1990). Psychoanalytic Approaches to Supervision. New York: Brunner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  55. Leader, D. (2010). Some thoughts on supervision. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 26 (2), 228–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Levy, S. T. (2009). Psychoanalytic education then and now. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57 (6), 1295–1309.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lothane, Z. (2007). Ethical flaws in training analysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 24 (4), 688–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Makari, G. (2008). Revolution in Mind: The Creation of Psychoanalysis. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  59. McKinney, M. (2000). Relational perspectives and the supervisory triad. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 17 (3), 565–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Moreau Ricaud, M. (2005). Max Eitingon and a question of politics. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 65 (4), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ogden, T. H. (2005). On psychoanalytic supervision. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86 (5), 1265–1280.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Paul, H. A. (2010). The Karen Horney Clinic and the legacy of Horney. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 70 (1), 63–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pomer, S. L. (1966). Max Eitingon: The organization of psychoanalytic training. In F. Alexander (Ed.), Psychoanalytic pioneers. (pp. 51–62). London: Transactions.Google Scholar
  64. Reeder, J. (2004). Hate and Love in Psychoanalytic Institutions. New York: Other Press.Google Scholar
  65. Richards, A. K. (2010). Training analysis and training analyst status: Where are we now? Psychoanalytic Review, 97 (6), 955–969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rosbrow, T. (1997). From parallel process to developmental process: A developmental/plan formulation approach to supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision. (pp. 213–238). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.Google Scholar
  67. Rubins, J. L. (1978). Karen Horney: Gentle Rebel of Psychoanalysis. New York: Dial Press.Google Scholar
  68. Sachs, H. (1943). In memoriam: Max Eitingon. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 12 (3), 453–456.Google Scholar
  69. Sarnat, J. (2012). Supervising psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Present knowledge, pressing needs, future possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42 (3), 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schroter, M. (2002). Max Eitingon and the struggle to establish an international standard for psychoanalytic training. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 83 (4), 875–893.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Searles, H. F. (1955). The informational value of supervisor’s emotional experience. Psychiatry, 18 (2), 135–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Szecsody, I. (2003). To become or be made a psychoanalyst. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 26 (2), 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Teitelbaum, S. H. (1990). Supertransference: The role of the supervisor’s blind spots. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7 (2), 243–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thomä, H. (1993). Training analysis and psychoanalytic education: Proposals for reform. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 21 (1), 3–75.Google Scholar
  75. Tracey, T. J. G., Bludworth, J. & Glidden-Tracey, C. E. (2012). Are there parallel processes in psychotherapy supervision: An empirical examination. Psychotherapy, 49 (2), 330–343.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wallerstein, R. S. (Ed.) (1981). Becoming a Psychoanalyst: A Study of Psychoanalytic Supervision. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
  77. Wallerstein, R. S. (2007). The optimal structure for psychoanalytic education: A feasible proposal? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55 (4), 953–984.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wallerstein, R. S. (2010). The training analysis: Psychoanalysis’ perennial problem. The Psychoanalytic Review, 97 (6), 903–936.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wallerstein, R. S. (2011). Psychoanalysis in the university: The natural home for education and research. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92 (3), 623–639.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Watkins, Jr. C. E. (2011a). Celebrating psychoanalytic supervision: Considering a century of seminal contribution. Psychoanalytic Review, 98 (3), 401–418.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Watkins, Jr. C. E. (2011b). Toward a tripartite vision of supervision for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapies: Alliance, transference-countertransference configuration, and real relationship. Psychoanalytic Review, 98 (4), 557–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Windholz, E. (1970). The theory of supervision in psychoanalytic education. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 51 (3), 393–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Zachrisson, A. (2011). Dynamics of psychoanalytic supervision: A heuristic model. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92 (4), 943–961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zaslavsky, J., Nunes, M. L. T. & Eizirik, C. L. (2005). Approaching countertransference in psychoanalytical supervision: A qualitative investigation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86 (4), 1099–1131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of North TexasDenton

Personalised recommendations