Asian Business & Management

, Volume 10, Issue 2, pp 259–286 | Cite as

Determinants and performance effects of management consultancy adoption in listed Chinese companies

  • Huihua Chen
  • Rong-Ruey Duh
  • Hung C (Leon) Chan
  • Jason Zezhong Xiao
Original Article


As China seriously lacks trained and experienced personnel at its current stage of development, management consultancy may be adopted as an economical solution to improve efficiency and performance. However, as institutional theory suggests, it is likely that the adoption of management consultancy in China is driven more by mimetic isomorphism factors than by actual performance considerations. Using data from a survey of 219 listed Chinese firms, our results suggest that there are significant positive effects from mimetic isomorphism factors and adoption of management accounting and controls and information and communication technology. Our study provides strong evidence that the adoption of management consultancy has a positive effect on firm performance, yet we cannot conclude that management consultancy is adopted to improve firm performance. Moreover, state ownership held by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) has a significant and positive effect on management consultancy adoption, whereas state ownership held by government agencies does not. One interpretation is that firms controlled by SOEs have acquired increased autonomy and become more innovative.


China consultancy information technology innovation diffusion management accounting performance 



Jason Xiao acknowledges financial support from a research grant of the National Natural Science Foundation, PRC (No. 71002005). The authors thank Chee Chow for useful guidance and close involvement and Lixin Zhao and Peking University Guanghua School of Management for the help provided in data collection. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. All errors and omissions are the authors’ responsibility.


  1. (2006) Analysis of enterprise management consulting,, accessed 21 December 2006.
  2. (2005) 2005 research report of management consultancy market development in China,, accessed 21 December 2006.
  3. Abrahamson, E. (1991) Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review 16 (3): 586–612.Google Scholar
  4. Armbrüster, T. (2006) The Economics and Sociology of Management Consulting. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1977) Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Barth, M.E., Beaver, W.H., Hand, J.R.M. and Landsman, W.R. (1999) Accruals, cash flows and equity values. Review of Accounting Studies 13: 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett, R.J. and Smith, C. (2004) The selection and control of management consultants by small business clients. International Small Business Journal 22 (5): 435–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Canbäck, S. (1998) The logic of management consulting, Pt.1. Journal of Management consulting 10 (2): 3–11.Google Scholar
  9. Canbäck, S. (1999) The logic of management consulting, Pt.2. Journal of Management consulting 10 (3): 3–12.Google Scholar
  10. Cao, C., Simin, T. and Zhao, J. (2008) Can growth options explain the trend in idiosyncratic risk? Review of Financial Studies 21 (6): 2599–2633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen, G., Firth, M. and Rui, O. (2006) Have China's enterprise reforms led to improved efficiency and profitability? Emerging Market Review 7 (1): 82–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cuervo, A. and Villalonga, B. (2000) Explaining the variance in the performance effects of privatization. Academy of Management Review 25: 581–591.Google Scholar
  13. Czerniawska, F. (2005) The new business consulting landscape. Consulting to Management 16 (4): 3–5.Google Scholar
  14. Czerniawska, F. (2006) Consultant: good; consulting firm: Bad. Consulting to Management 17 (2): 3–5.Google Scholar
  15. DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983) The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48: 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Firth, M. (1996) The diffusion of managerial accounting procedures in the People's Republic of China and the influence of foreign-partnered joint ventures. Accounting, Organizations and Society 21 (7/8): 629–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forman, C. (2005) The corporate digital divide: Determinants of internet adoption. Management Science 51 (4): 641–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Foster, G. and Swenson, D.A.W. (1997) Measuring the success of activity-based cost management and its determinants. Journal of Management Accounting Research 9: 109–142.Google Scholar
  19. (2006) Enterprise management consulting,, accessed 21 December 2006.Google Scholar
  20. Goolsbee, A. and Klenow, P. (2002) Evidence on learning and network externalities in the diffusion of home computers. Journal of Law and Economics XLV: 317–344.Google Scholar
  21. Gross, A. (2004) Management consultancy in Central Europe. Consulting to Management 15 (1): 33–38.Google Scholar
  22. Hall, B. (2004) Innovation and Diffusion. NBER Working Paper Series W10212,, accessed 21 December 2006.
  23. Hambrick, D.C. and D'Aveni, R.A. (1988) Large corporate failures as downward spirals. Administrative Science Quarterly 33 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henisz, W., Guillen, M. and Zelner, B. (2005) The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977-1999. American Sociological Review 70: 871–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. IBISWorld Inc. (2009) IBISWorld Industry Report of Global Management Consultants: L6712-GL. 19 August.Google Scholar
  26. Iacovou, C.L., Benbasat, I. and Dexter, A.S. (1995) Electronic data interchange and small organizations: Adoption and impact of technology. MIS Quarterly 19 (4): 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kaiser, H. (1960) The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20: 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kipping, M. (1999) American management consulting companies in Western Europe, 1920-1990: Products, Reputation and Relationships. Business History Review 73 (2): 190–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kubr, M. (ed.) (2002) Management Consulting: A Guide to the Profession. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  30. Maris, T.L. and Meier, R.E. (1986) A profile of management consulting firms. Journal of Information Systems 1 (1): 113–117.Google Scholar
  31. McGivern, C. (1983) Some facets of the relationship between consultants and clients in organizations. Journal of Management Studies 20 (3): 367–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977) Institutional organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  34. O'Connor, N.O., Chow, C.W. and Wu, A. (2004) The adoption of ‘Western’ management accounting/controls in China's state-owned enterprises. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29: 349–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Otchere, I.K. and Zhang, A. (2001) Privatization, efficiency and intra-industry effects: Analysis of China's privatization. International Review of Finance 2 (1/2): 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powell, W. and DiMaggio, P. (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Rogers, E.M. (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. 4th edn. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  38. Soriano, D.R. (2003) The impact of consulting service on Spanish firms. Journal of Small Business Management 41 (4): 409–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sun, Q. and Tong, W. (2003) China share issue privatization: The extent of its success. Journal of Financial Economics 70: 183–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang, J.W. (2003) Governance role of different types of state shareholders: Evidence from China's listed companies. PhD dissertation, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  41. Wang, L.Y. and Zhang, R. (2000) The management value of accounting information – Past, present and future of management accounting. Finance and Accounting (2): 20–23.Google Scholar
  42. Wei, Z., Xie, F. and Zhang, S. (2005) Ownership structure and firm value in China's privatized firms, 1991-2001. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 40 (1): 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wiwattanakantang, Y. (1999) An empirical study on the determinants of the capital structure of Thai firms. Pacific Basin Finance Journal 7: 371–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wright, P. (1996) Impact of corporate insider, blockholder, and institutional equity ownership on firm risk-taking. Academy of Management Journal 39: 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Xu, X. and Wang, Y. (1997) Ownership Structure, Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance. Washington DC: World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper 1794.Google Scholar
  46. Yin, R.K. (1989) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. Zander, J. (1997) An American's perspective. Journal of Management Consulting 9 (4): 33–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Huihua Chen
    • 1
  • Rong-Ruey Duh
    • 2
  • Hung C (Leon) Chan
    • 3
  • Jason Zezhong Xiao
    • 4
  1. 1.Centre for Finance and Accounting Research, University of International Business and EconomicsBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of AccountingNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  3. 3.Chan College of Business Administration, San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  4. 4.Cardiff Business School, Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations