Asian Business & Management

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 425–448 | Cite as

Foreign investment in China and Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII)

  • On Kit Tam
  • Sophia G Li
  • Zhifan Zhang
  • Celina Ping Yu
Original Article

Abstract

Although foreign direct investment has been flowing into China at record high levels in recent years, foreign investors were not permitted to enter the domestic Chinese shares market (A shares) until the Chinese authorities decided at the end of 2002 to allow selected Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor (QFII) to enter the Chinese A-share market under a quantitative quota system. The aim of this financial reform initiative was to provide a pilot scheme for relaxing, in a limited way, foreign exchange controls over the country's capital account, as well as to leverage the investment and management skills of successful foreign financial institutions to raise the standards of the Chinese market. QFII are perceived by the Chinese Government to have stronger motivation to undertake long-term investment strategies. They are expected to bring with them not only advanced investment methodology and skills, but also an investment approach that may help develop a more stable and healthy stock market environment. This study examines the empirical evidence of this development to assess if such expectations are being fulfilled. The findings suggest that QFII have made some inroads, but have not yet been able to exert long-term impacts on the Chinese market.

Keywords

China stock market foreign investors QFII institutional investors global capital market 

References

  1. Bekaert, G. and Harvey, C.R. (2000) Foreign speculators and emerging equity markets. Journal of Finance 55: 563–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chan, B. and Lo, W. (2000) Financial market integration in the greater China bloc: Evidence from causality investigation of stock returns. Asia Pacific Journal of Finance 3: 53–69.Google Scholar
  3. Dai, Z. and Hu, J. (2003) On implementing QFII system in Chinese securities market. Shangye Yanjiu [Commerce Research] 20: 96–98.Google Scholar
  4. Development Research Center (2003) Qi Bin and Ba Shusong, A study of the Market Impact and Regulatory Evolution of QFII. Beijing: Development Research Center of the State Council.Google Scholar
  5. Errunza, V. and Losq, E. (1985) International asset pricing under mild segmentation: Theory and test. Journal of Finance 40: 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Errunza, V. and Losq, E. (1989) Capital flow controls, international asset pricing, and investors’ welfare: A multi-country framework. Journal of Finance 44: 1025–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Errunza, V. and Miller, D.P. (2000) Market segmentation and the cost of capital in international equity markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35: 577–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eun, C. and Janakiramanan, S. (1986) A model of international asset pricing with a constraint on foreign equity ownership. Journal of Finance 41: 897–914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Groenewold, N. (2004) Autocorrelation and volume in the Chinese stock market. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies 7: 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Henry, P.B. (2000) Stock market liberalisation, economic reform and emerging market equity prices. Journal of Finance 55: 529–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang, B.-N., Yang, C.-W. and Hu, J.W.-S. (2000) Causality and co-integration of stock markets among the United States, Japan and South China growth triangle. International Review of Financial Analysis 9 (3): 281–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Johansen, S. (1988) Statistical analysis of co-integrating vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 12: 231–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johansen, S. and Juselius, K. (1990) Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration, with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52: 169–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Khalid, A.M. and Kawai, M. (2003) Was financial market contagion the source of economic crisis in Asia? Evidence using a multivariate VAR model. Journal of Asian Economics 14: 131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, E.H. and Singal, V. (2000) Stock market openings: Experience of emerging economies. Journal of Business 73: 25–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kwan, F.B. and Reyes, M.G. (1997) Price effects of stock market liberalisation in Taiwan. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 37 (2): 511–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Masih, A.M.M. and Masih, R. (1999) Are Asian stock market fluctuations due mainly to intra-regional contagion effects? Evidence based on Asian emerging stock markets. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 7: 251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Masih, R. and Masih, A.M.M. (2001) Long and short-term dynamic causal transmission amongst international stock markets. Journal of International Money and Finance 20: 563–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Patro, D.K. and Wald, J.K. (2005) Firm characteristics and the impact of emerging market liberalization. Journal of Banking and Finance 29: 1671–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sjoo, B. and Zhang, J. (2000) Market segmentation and information diffusion in China’s stock markets. Journal of Multinational Financial Management 10: 421–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Stulz, R.M. (1999) Globalisation and the Cost of Equity Capital. Washington DC: National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper 7021.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • On Kit Tam
    • 1
  • Sophia G Li
    • 2
  • Zhifan Zhang
    • 3
  • Celina Ping Yu
    • 4
  1. 1.RMIT University, 293 Bourke StreetMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Financial EngineeringCentral University of Finance and EconomicsHaidian DistrictChina
  3. 3.Department of StatisticsUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.School of Economics, Finance and Marketing, RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations