Asian Business & Management

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 5–21 | Cite as

Failure of the libertarian approach to reducing poverty

  • Aneel Karnani
Perspective Article

Abstract

A libertarian movement (often referred to as ‘bottom of the pyramid’ or BOP strategies in the business literature) that emphasizes free markets to reduce poverty has grown strong in recent years. It views the poor as ‘resilient and creative entrepreneurs and value-conscious consumers’. This romanticized view of the poor is far from the truth and harms the poor in two ways. First, it results in too little emphasis on legal, regulatory and social mechanisms to protect the poor who are vulnerable consumers. Second, it results in overemphasis on microcredit and under-emphasis on fostering modern enterprises that would provide employment opportunities for the poor. More importantly, the libertarian proposition grossly under-emphasizes the critical role and responsibility of the state in poverty reduction.

Keywords

poverty reduction bottom of pyramid consumption choices microentrepreneurs 

References

  1. Asunta, M. (2001) Impact of alcohol consumption on Asia. The Globe, special issue 4, pp. 4–8.Google Scholar
  2. Asunta, M., Idris, M. and Hamid (2001) The alcohol problem in Malaysia. The Globe, Special Issue 4, pp. 18–20.Google Scholar
  3. Baklien, B. and Samarasinghe, D. (2004) Alcohol and poverty in Sri Lanka. FORUT, Norway, http://www.forut.no/index.php/15703-1.
  4. Banerjee, A., Deaton, A. and Duflo, E. (2004) Wealth, health and health services in Rural Rajasthan. American Economic Review 94 (2): 326–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee, A. and Duflo, E. (2006) The economic lives of the poor. Journal of Economic Perspectives 21 (1): 141–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee, A., Duflo, E. and Glennerster, R. (2006) A snapshot of micro enterprises in Hyderabad. Unpublished paper, MIT.Google Scholar
  7. Bateman, M. and Ellerman, D. (2005) Micro-finance: Poverty reduction breakthrough or neo-liberal dead-end? UNDP conference ‘Poverty Round-table: Achieving MDG1 (sustainable poverty reduction) in BiH’; 16–17 June, Sarajevo.Google Scholar
  8. Bertrand, M., Mullainathan, S. and Shafir, E. (2004) A behavioral economics view of poverty. American Economic Review 94 (2): 419–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhide, A. and Schramm, C. (2007) Phelps's prize. Wall Street Journal, 29 January.Google Scholar
  10. Bolin, L. (2005) SABMiller's new clear sorghum beer. business.iafrica.com, 2 February.Google Scholar
  11. Chang, H.-J. (2008) Bad Samaritans. New York: Bloomsbury Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clay, J. (2005) Exploring the Links between International Business and Poverty Reduction: A Case Study of Unilever in Indonesia. Oxford: Oxfam.Google Scholar
  13. Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E. and Smith, H.L. (1999) Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychology Bulletin 125 (2): 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Duflo, E., Kremer, M. and Robinson, J. (2006) Understanding fertilizer adoption: Evidence from field experiments. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (mimeo).Google Scholar
  15. Economist. (2006a) The flicker of a brighter future. 7 September.Google Scholar
  16. Economist. (2006b) Macro credit. 19 October.Google Scholar
  17. Economist. (2007a) Another day, another $1.08. 28 April.Google Scholar
  18. Economist. (2007b) Strange allure of the slums. 3 May.Google Scholar
  19. Efroymson, D. and Ahmed, S. (2001) Hungry for tobacco. Tobacco Control 10: 212–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fafchamps, M. and Shilpi, F. (2008) Subjective welfare, isolation and relative consumption. Journal of Development Economic 86 (1): 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman, T. (2005) The World is Flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
  22. Gangopadhyay, S. and Wadhwa, W. (2004) Changing Pattern of Household Consumption Expenditure. Society for Economic Research & Financial Analysis, New Delhi: Planning Commission, Government of India.Google Scholar
  23. Hammond, A. and Prahalad, C.K. (2004) Selling to the poor. Foreign Policy, May–June: 30–37.Google Scholar
  24. International Labor Organization. (2007) LABORSTA Internet database, http://laborsta.ilo.org/, accessed 10 May.
  25. Karnani, A. (2007a) Microfinance misses its mark. Stanford Social Innovation Review 5 (3): 34–40.Google Scholar
  26. Karnani, A. (2007b) Doing well by doing good: Case Study – ‘Fair & Lovely’ whitening cream. Strategic Management Journal 28 (13): 1351–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karnani, A. (2007c) The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid. California Management Review 49 (4): 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luttmer, E.F.P. (2005) Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (3): 963–1002.Google Scholar
  29. Meenakshi, J.V. and Vishwanathan, B. (2003) Calorie deprivation in rural India, 1983–1999/2000. Economic and Political Weekly, 25 January.Google Scholar
  30. Pattnayak, S.R. (2006) The Return of the State. Delhi: Yash.Google Scholar
  31. Prahalad, C.K. (2005) Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profits. Philadelphia, PA: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  32. Prahalad, C.K. and Hammond, A. (2002) Serving the world's poor profitably. Harvard Business Review, September: 4–11.Google Scholar
  33. Rajan, R. and Zingales, L. (2003) Saving Capitalism from the Capitalists. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  34. Sen, A. (2000) Development as Freedom. Philadelphia, PA: Anchor.Google Scholar
  35. Sharma, K. (2000) Rediscovering Dharavi: Stories from Asia's Largest Slum. New Delhi, India: Penguin Books India.Google Scholar
  36. Time. (2005) Selling to the poor. 17 April.Google Scholar
  37. Times of India. (2004) Poor hygiene kills 5 lakh kids a year. 24 March.Google Scholar
  38. UNICEF. (2008) India statistics, http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/india_statistics.html, accessed 14 April.
  39. Wall, B. (2006) Facing global challenges while turning a profit. International Herald Tribune, 7 July.Google Scholar
  40. Wolf, M. (2004) Why Globalization Works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  41. World Bank. (2006) World Development Indicators 2006. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aneel Karnani
    • 1
  1. 1.Ross School of Business, The University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations