Abstract
Management of the axilla in breast cancer patients is a controversial issue. Axillary sampling and sentinel lymphadenectomy are both conservative surgical approaches which aim to stage the disease. These procedures target selective treatment of node-positive patients and seem to allow the omission of axillary clearance in node-negative ones. In this way, they reduce the rate of complications in an otherwise overtreated subset of patients. Forty consecutive patients with palpable T1 and T2 breast carcinoma underwent sentinel lymphadenectomy following mapping with Patent blue dye, with subsequent axillary clearance and excision of the tumor or mastectomy. Then the largest/firmest 3,4,5 and 6 nodes were selected from all the lymph nodes in order to model an axillary sample. It was suggested that these are the nodes that are the most likely to be included in the specimen during sampling, because of their size and consistency. The probability of the sentinel lymph nodes falling into the sample of the 3-6 largest/firmest nodes was calculated. The sentinel nodes predicted the axillary nodal status in 95%, while the samples of the largest 3, 4, 5 and 6 nodes were predictive in 95, 96, 98 and 98%, respectively. The two methods of evaluation displayed a considerable overlap, as the sentinel node would have been included in the 3–6 largest/firmest nodes in 79–92% of the cases, depending on the number of largest nodes evaluated. The overlap was greater after fine needle aspiration of the primary tumor. Although the two alternative staging procedures of 3, 4, 5 or 6 node sampling and sentinel lymphadenectomy with the vital blue dye technique cannot be simultaneously done without one influencing the other, and the first method was only modeled, the results suggest that there is a considerable overlap between the two; axillary sampling may often remove the sentinel lymph nodes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albertini JJ, Lyman GH, Cox C, et al: Principles and guidelines for 4 surgeons - management of symptomatic breast cancer. On behalf of the European Society of Surgical Oncology. Eur J Surg Oncol 23:101–109, 1997.
Borgstein P, Meijer S: Historical perspective of lymphatic tumour spread and the emergence of the sentinel node concept. Eur J Surg Oncol 24:85–89, 1998.
Cady B: Use of primary breast carcinoma characteristics to predict lymph node metastases. Editorial. Cancer79:1856–1861, 1997.
Cady B, Stone MD, Schuler JG, et al: The new era in breast cancer: invasion, size and nodal involvement dramatically decreasing as a result of mammographic screening. Arch Surg 131:301–308, 1996.
Cserni G: Changing trends in lymph node recovery from axillary clearance specimens in breast cancer: possible implications for the quantitative axillary status from a 17 year retrospective study. Eur J Oncol 2:403–408, 1997.
Cserni G: Histopathologic basis for axillary sampling. Eur J Cancer 34(Suppl. 5):S 109, 1998.
Davidson T: Why I favour axillary node clearance in the management of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 21:5–7, 1995.
Davies GC, Millis RR, Hayward JL: Assessment of axillary lymph node status. Ann Surg 192:148–151, 1980.
Fisher CJ, Boyle S, Burke M, et al: Intraoperative assessment of nodal status in the selection of patients with breast cancer for axillary clearance. Br J Surg 80:457–458, 1993.
Forrest APM, Everington D, McDonald CC, et al: The Edinburgh randomized trial of axillary sampling or clearance after mastectomy. Br J Surg 82:1504–1508, 1995.
Forrest APM, Roberts MM, Cant E, et al: Simple mastectomy and pectoral node biopsy. Br J Surg 63:569–575, 1976.
Giuliano AE, Dale PS, Turner RR, et al: Improved axillary staging of breast cancer with sentinel lymphadenectomy. Ann Surg 180:700–704, 1995.
Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, et al: Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 220:391–401, 1994.
Greenall MJ: Why I favour axillary node sampling in the management of breast cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 21:2–5, 1995.
Harris JR, Osteen RT: Patients with early breast cancer benefit from effective axillary treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 5:17–21, 1985.
Kingston RD, Bridger J, Smith CJ, et al: Axillary sampling and radiotherapy does not compromise the patient with early breast cancer: Trafford database experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 21:364–367, 1995.
Kinne DW: Controversies in primary breast cancer management. Am J Surg 166:502–508, 1993.
Kiricuta CI, Tausch J: A mathematical model of axillary lymph node involvement based on 1446 complete axillary dissections in patients with breast carcinoma. Cancer69:2496–2501, 1992.
Kissin MW, Thompson PH, Price AB, et al: The inadequacy of axillary sampling in breast cancer. Lancet i:1210–1212, 1982.
Kjaergaard J, Blichert-Toft M, Andersen JA et al: Probability of false negative nodal staging in conjunction with partial axillary dissection in breast cancer. Br J Surg 72:365–367, 1985.
Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, et al: Surgical resection and radiolocalization of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 2:335–340, 1993.
Margolese RG: Surgery and Adjuvant Chemotherapy. In: Comprehensive Textbook of Oncology, 2nd edition. (Eds: Moossa AR, Schimpff SC, Robson MC), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 1991, pp.800–810.
Mathiesen O, Carl J, Bonderup O, etal: Axillary sampling and the risk of erroneous staging of breast cancer. Acta Oncol 29:721–725, 1990.
Moore MP, Kinne DW: Axillary lymphadenectomy: a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure. J Surg Oncol 66:2–6, 1997.
Pigott J, Nichols MD, Maddox WA, et al: Metastases to the upper levels of axillary nodes in carcinoma of the breast and its implications for nodal sampling procedures. Surg Gynecol Obstet 158:255–259, 1984.
Ridings P, Bucknall TE: Modern trends in breast cancer therapy: towards less lymphoedema? Eur J Surg Oncol 24:21–22, 1998.
Statman R, Giuliano AE: The role of the sentinel lymph node in the management of patients with breast cancer. Adv Surg 30:209–221, 1997.
Steele RJC, Forrest APM, Gibson T, et al: The efficacy of lower axillary sampling in obtaining lymph node status in breast cancer; a controlled randomised trial. Br J Surg 72:368–369, 1985.
The Breast Surgeons Group of the British Association of Surgical Oncology: Guidelines for surgeons in the management of symptomatic breast disease in the United Kingdom. Eur J Surg Oncol 21(Suppl A):1’13, 1995.
Turner RR, Ollila DW, Krasne DL, et al: Histopathologic validation of the sentinel lymph node hypothesis for breast carcinoma. Ann Surg 226:271–276, 1997.
Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al: Sentinel-node biopsy to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative lymph-nodes. Lancet349:1864–1867, 1997.
Veronesi U, Zurrida S, Galimberti V: Consequences of sentinel node in clinical decision making in breast cancer and prospects for future studies. Eur J Surg Oncol 24:93–95, 1998
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cserni, G. Estimating the overlap between sentinel lymph nodes and axillary node samples in breast cancer. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 5, 129–133 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1053/paor.1999.0174
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/paor.1999.0174