Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic variability and divergence among Italian populations of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.)

Variabilité génétique et différenciation entre populations italiennes de frêne commun (Fraxinus excelsior L.)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Forest Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The level of genetic variation throughout the Italian range of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) was estimated using six microsatellite markers. High levels of allelic diversity was detected. The levels of expected heterozygosity for each of the populations ranged from 0.726 to 0.871, with an average of 0.798, and indicated that populations have a high level of genetic variation. A general and significant homozygote excess was found at most loci in all populations, with an overall mean F IS of 0.284. Possible explanations for such situations are discussed. Only 4.9% of the total diversity was attributable to differentiation among populations. Although divergence among pedo-climatic regions explained only a small part of the variance it was possible to observe some partial clustering of populations belonging to the same regions. The contribution of the results in relation to the definition of the most appropriate strategies to collect forest reproductive material is discussed.

Résumé

Le niveau de variation génétique dans l’aire de distribution naturelle du frêne commun (Fraxinus excelsior L.) en Italie a été estimé à l’aide de six marqueurs microsatellite. Des niveaux élevés de diversité allélique ont été détectés. L’hétérozygotie théorique varie de 0,726 à 0,871, avec une moyenne de 0,798, ce qui indique que les populations ont un niveau élevé de variation génétique. Un excès général et significatif de l’homozygotie a été trouvé pour la plupart des loci dans toutes les populations, avec une moyenne globale F IS de 0,284. Des explications possibles pour de telles situations sont proposées. Seulement 4,9 % de toute la diversité est attribuable à la différenciation entre populations. Bien que la divergence entre régions pédo-climatiques explique une petite partie de la variation, il est possible d’observer des regroupements partiels de populations appartenant aux mêmes régions. La contribution de ces résultats à la définition des stratégies les plus appropriées pour rassembler le matériel forestier de reproduction est discutée.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bacles C.F.E., Burczyk J., Lowe A.J., Ennos R.A., Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L., Evolution 59 (2005) 979–990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Belletti P., Monteleone I., Frassino maggiore, in: Calvo E., Fedrigol M., Vaiani L. (Eds.), Caratterizzazione genetica di popolazioni forestali della Lombardia. Regione Lombardia, Azienda Regionale delle Foreste, Milano, 2002, pp. 44–48.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Belletti P., Monteleone I., Ferrazzini D., Genetic variability at allozyme markers, in sycamore (Acer pseudopatanus L.), populations from north-western Italy, Can. J. For. Res. (2007) (in press).

  4. Boshier D., Amaral W., Threats to forest ecosystems and challenges for the conservation and sustainable use of forest genetic resources, in: Vinceti B., Amaral W., Meilleur B. (Eds.), Challenges in managing forest genetic resources for livelihoods, IPGRI, Rome, 2004, pp. 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boshier D., Stewart J., How local is local? Identifying the scale of adaptative variation in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.): results from the nursery, Forestry 78 (2005) 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brachet S., Jubier M.F., Richard M., Jung-Muller B., Frascaria-Lacoste N., Rapid identification of microsatellite loci using 5′ anchored PCR in the common ash Fraxinus excelsior L., Mol. Ecol. 8 (1999) 160–163.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brookfield J.F.Y., A simple new method for estimating null allele frequency from heterozygote deficiency, Mol. Ecol. 5 (1996) 453–455.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruford M.W., Ciofi C., Funk S.M., Characteristics of microsatellites, in: Karp A., Isaac P.G., Ingram D.S. (Eds.), Molecular Tools for Screening Biodiversity, Chapman & Hall, London, 1998, pp. 202–205.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Comes H.P., Kadereit J.W., The effect of Quaternary climatic changes on plant distribution and evolution, Trends Plant Sci. 3 (1998) 432–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cundall E.P., Cahalan CM., Connolly T., Early results of ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) provenance trials at sites in England and Wales, Forestry 76 (2003) 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson G., Global warming and gene conservation of Noble Hardwoods, in: Turok J., Jensen J., Palmberg-Lerche C., Rusanen M., Russell K., de Vries S., Lipman E. (Eds.), Noble Hardwood Network — Report of the Third Meeting, 13–16 June 1998, Sagadi, Estonia, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, 1999, pp. 98–112.

    Google Scholar 

  12. European Commission, Georeferenced soil database of Europe, Manual of procedures, Version 1.0, EUR 18092 EN, 1999.

  13. Excoffier L., Smouse P.E., Quattro J.M., Analysis of Molecular Variance Inferred From Metric Distances Among DNA Haplotypes: Application to Human Mitochondrial DNA Restriction Data, Genetics 131 (1992) 479–491.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Excoffier L., Laval G., Schneider S., Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis, Evol. Bioinf. Online 1 (2005) 47–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Farris M.A., Mitton J.B., Population density, outcrossing rate, and heterozygosity superiority in ponderosa pine, Evolution 38 (1984) 1151–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Felsenstein J., PHYLIP: Phytogeny Inference Package, Version 3.6. (2004) http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip/doc/main.html.

  17. FRAXIGEN, Ash species in Europe: biological characteristics and practical guidelines for sustainable use, Oxford Forestry Institute, University of Oxford, U.K., 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gérard P.R., Fernandez M.J.F., Frascaria-Lacoste N., Temporal cline in a hybrid zone population between Fraxinus excelsior L. and F. angustifolia Valh, Mol. Ecol. (2006) in press.

  19. Goudet J., FSTAT (Version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics, J. Hered. 86 (1995) 485–486.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Guo S.W., Thompson E.A., Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles, Biometrics 48 (1992) 361–372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Herzog S., Krabel D., Preserving genetic resources: concepts and silvicoltural consequences on some European genera of Fagaceae, Forest Snow and Landscape Research 75 (2000) 205–217.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Heuertz M., Hausman J.F., Tsvetkov I., Frascaria-Lacoste N., Vekemans X., Assessment of genetic structure with and among Bulgarian populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.), Mol. Ecol. 10 (2001) 1615–1623.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Heuertz M., Vekemans X., Hausman J.F., Palada M., Hardy O.J., Estimating seed versus pollen dispersal from spatial genetic structure in the common ash, Mol. Ecol. 12 (2003) 2483–2495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Heuertz M., Fineschi S., Anzidei M., Pastorelli R., Salvani D., Paule L., Frascaria-Lacoste N., Hardy O.J., Vekemans X., Vendramin G.G., Chloroplast DNA variation and postglacial recolonization of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) in Europe, Mol. Ecol. 13 (2004) 3437–3452.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Heuertz M., Hausman J.F., Hardy O.J., Vendramin G.G., Frascaria-Lacoste N., Vekemans X., Nuclear microsatellites reveal contrasting patterns of genetic structure between western and southeastern European populations of the common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.), Evolution 58 (2004) 976–988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huntley B., Birks H.J.B., An Atlas of Past and Present Pollen Maps of Europe: 0–13 000 Years Ago, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lefort F., Brachet S., Frascaria-Lacoste N., Edwards K.J., Douglas G.C., Identification and characterization of microsatellite loci in ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) and their conservation in the olive family (Oleaceae), Mol. Ecol. 8 (1999) 1088–1090.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mantel N., The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach, Canc. Res. 27 (1967) 209–220.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Morand M.E., Brachet S., Rossignol P., Dufour J., Frascaria-Lacoste N., A generalized heterozygote deficiency assessed with microsatellites in French common ash populations, Mol. Ecol. 11 (2002) 377–385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Morand-Prieur M.E., Raquin C., Shykoff A., Frascaria-Lacoste N., Males outcompete hermaphrodites for seed siring success in controlled crosses in polygamous Fraxinus excelsior (Oleaceae), Am. J. Bot. 90 (2003) 949–953.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Namkoong G., Forest Genetics and Conservation in Europe, in: Turok J., Palmberg-Lerche C., Skrøppa T., Ouédraogo A.S. (Eds.), Conservation of forest genetic resources in Europe, International Plant for Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, 1998, pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nei M., Genetics distance between populations, Am. Nat. 106 (1972) 282–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Nei M., Molecular Evolutionary Genetics, Columbia University Press, New York, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Newton A.C., Allnutt T.R., Gillies A.C.M., Lowe A.J., Ennos R.A., Molecular phylogeography, intraspecific variation and the conservation of tree species, Trends Ecol. Evol. 14 (1999) 140–145.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Palmberg-Lerche C., Conservation of forest biological diversity and forest genetic resources, in: Palmberg-Lerche P., Iversen P.A., Sigaud P. (Eds.), Forest Genetic Resources 29, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 2001, 70 p.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pemberton J.M., Slate J., Bancroft D.R., Barrett J.A., Nonamplifying alleles at microsatellites loci: a caution for parentage and population studies, Mol. Ecol. 4 (1995) 249–252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Picard J.F., Contribution a l’étude de la biologie florale et de la fructification du Frêne commun (Fraxinus excelsior L.), Rev. For. Fr. 34 (1982) 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pliûra A., European long-term gene conservation strategies: Ash (Fraxinus spp.), in: Turok J., Jensen J., Palmeberg-Lerche C., Rusanen M., Russell K., de Vries S., Lipman E. (Eds.), Noble hard-woods network — Report of the third meeting, 13–16 June 1998, Sagadi, Estonia, International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, 1999, pp. 8–20.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Raymond M., Rousset F., Genepop (version 1.2): population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism, J. Hered. 86 (1995) 248–249.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Reynolds J., Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C., Estimation for the coancestry coefficient: basis for a short-term genetic distance, Genetics 105 (1983) 767–779.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rholf F.J., NTSYS-PC, Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system, Version 2.1, Setauket, NY, USA, Exeter Publishing, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rice W.R., Analyzing tables of statistical tests, Evolution 43 (1989) 223–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Rossi P., Vendramin G.G., Giannini R., Estimation of mating system parameters in two Italian natural populations of Fagus sylvatica, Can. J. For. Res. 26 (1996) 1187–1192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Slatkin M., A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies, Genetics 139 (1995) 457–462.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. SPSS, SPSS Base 12.0 for Windows User’s Guide, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Tessier du Cros E., Màtyàs C., Kriebel H., Contribution of genetics to the sustained management of global forest resources — Conclusions and recommendations, in: Màtyàs C. (Ed.), Forest genetics and sustainability, Forestry Sciences, Vol. 63, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1999, pp. 281–287.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Toro M.A., Caballero A., Characterization and conservation of genetic diversity in subdivided populations, Phil. T. Roy. Soc. B. 1459 (2005) 1367–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Van Oosterhout C., Hutchinson W.F., Wills D.P.M., Shipley P., Micro-checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data, Mol. Ecol. Notes 40 (2004) 535–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Vendramin G.G., Degen B., Petit R., Anzidei M., Madaghiele A., Ziegenhagen B., High level of variation at Abies alba chloroplast microsatellite loci in Europe, Mol. Ecol. 8 (1999) 1117–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C., Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of populations structure, Evolution 38 (1984) 1358–1370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Wright S., Systems of mating, Genetics 6 (1921) 111–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Wright S., Evolution and the genetics of populations, The theory of gene frequency, Vol. 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Yadzani R., Muona O., Rudin D., Szmidt A.E., Genetic structure of a Pinus sylvestris L. seed-tree stand and naturally regenerated understory, For. Sci. 31 (1986) 430–436.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piero Belletti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferrazzini, D., Monteleone, I. & Belletti, P. Genetic variability and divergence among Italian populations of common ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.). Ann. For. Sci. 64, 159–168 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006100

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006100

Navigation