Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Organic and conventional management of mixtures of wheat and spring cereals

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cereal mixtures may provide both organic and conventional producers with a more sustainable approach in reducing weed pressure, crop rotation flexibility, improved yield stability, buffering against pests and diseases, minimizing soil variability and increasing animal feed value. We examined the response of small grain mixtures containing wheat, oats, barley and triticale to varying degrees of natural competition and environmental stress at three locations in central Alberta, Canada. One modern and one heritage hard-red spring wheat cultivar, along with one cultivar each of oats, barley and triticale and eighteen two-way mixtures, were planted on organic and conventional land at seven location-years between 2003 and 2005. Average yields were 30% to 70% lower on organically managed sites. Monocrop barley yielded 43% and 16% higher than the site average at two organic locations. Our results suggest two main conclusions: (1) on conventionally managed land, wheat-barley mixtures exhibited potential for yield maintenance and weed suppression, and; (2) on organically managed land, competition with weeds had a large negative effect on yield (>30%). The 25:75 mixtures of wheat and oats, and all mixtures of Park (a heritage) wheat and Manny barley exhibited yield potential similar to or (up to 1.0 t ha−1) greater than monocrop yield. Manny barley mixtures exhibited weed suppressive capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberta Agriculture Food and Rural Development (1995) Soil group map of Alberta / compiled by Alberta Land Resource Unit, Research Branch, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada. Conservation and Development Branch, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Edmonton, AB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey K.L., Lazarovits G. (2003) Suppressing soil-borne diseases with residue management and organic amendments, Soil Till. Res. 72, 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brook H. (Ed.) (2006) Crop protection 2006, Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Edmonton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousens R.D. (1996) Comparative growth of wheat, barley, and annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in monoculture and mixture, Aust. J. Agr. Res. 47, 449–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creamer N.G., Bennett M.D., Stinner B.R., Cardina J., Regnier E.E. (1996) Mechanisms of weed suppression in cover crop-based production systems, HortScience 31, 410–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finckh M.R., Gacek E.S., Goyeau H., Lannou C., Merz U., Mundt C.C., Munk L., Nadziak J., Newton A.C., de Vallavieille-Pope C., Wolfe M.S. (2000) Cereal cultivar and species mixtures in practice, with emphasis on disease resistance, Agronomie 20, 813–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis C.A. (1989) Biological efficiencies in multiple-cropping systems, Adv. Agron. 42, 1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukai S. (1993) Intercropping-bases of productivity, Field Crop Res. 34, 239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokinen K. (1991) Competition and yield performance in mixtures of oats and barley — nitrogen fertilization, density and proportion of the components, J. Agr. Sci. Finland 63, 321–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juskiw P.E., Helm J.H., Salmon D.F. (2000)a Competitive ability in mixtures of small grain cereals, Crop Sci. 40, 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juskiw P.E., Helm J.H., Salmon D.F. (2000)b Postheading biomass distribution for monocrops and mixtures of small grain cereals, Crop Sci. 40, 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., Wolfinger R.D., Shabenberger O. (Eds.) (2006), SAS for Mixed Models, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis R.S., Connor D.J. (1992) Crop ecology: productivity and management in agricultural systems, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maloney T.S., Oplinger E.S., Albrecht K.A. (1999) Small grains for fall and spring forage, J. Prod. Agr. 12, 488–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason H.E., Spaner D. (2006) Competitive ability of wheat in conventional and organic management systems: a review of the literature, Can. J. Plant Sci. 86, 333–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donovan J.T., Harker K.N., Clayton G.W., Hall L.M. (2000) Wild oat (Avena fatua) interference in barley (Hordeum vulgare) is influenced by barley variety and seeding rate, Weed Technol. 14, 624–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S.M., King J.R., O’Donovan J.T., Spaner D. (2004) Forage potential of intercropping berseem clover with barley, oat or triticale, Agron. J. 96, 1013–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1999) Release 8.2. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobkowicz P., Tendziagolska E. (2005) Competition and productivity in mixture of oats and wheat, J. Agron. Crop Sci. 191, 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Canada. (2002) 2001 Census of Agriculture [electronic resource]: farm data and farm operator data: full releases, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel R.G.D., Torrie J.H., Dickey D.A. (1996) Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach, 3rd ed, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoskopf N.C. (1985) Cereal Grain Crops Prentice-Hall, Virginia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B.R. (1978) Studies on a barley-oats mixture, J. Agr. Sci Camb. 91, 587–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teasdale J.R., Mangum R.W., Radhakrishnan J., Cavigelli M.A. (2004) Weed seedbank dynamics in three organic farming crop rotations, Agron. J. 96, 1429–1435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine J. (1982) Variation in monoculture and in mixture for grain yield and other characters in spring barley, Ann. Appl. Biol. 101, 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilich-Meller V. (1992) Pseudocercosporella herpotrichoides, Fusarium spp. and Rhizotonia cerealis stem rot in pure stands and interspecific mixtures of cereals, Crop Prot. 11, 45–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilich V. (1993) Crop rotation with pure stands and mixtures of barley and wheat to control stem and root rot diseases, Crop Prot. 12, 373–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton P.D. (1975) Annual forages seeding rates and mixtures for central Alberta, Can. J. Plant Sci. 55, 987–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Spaner.

About this article

Cite this article

Kaut, A.H.E.E., Mason, H.E., Navabi, A. et al. Organic and conventional management of mixtures of wheat and spring cereals. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28, 363–371 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008017

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008017

Keywords

Navigation