Skip to main content
Log in

Crop patterns and habitat preferences of the grey partridge farmland bird

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agricultural changes such as intensification and specialization are thought to be the major source of the severe decline of farmland bird populations observed on large spatial scales and over long time spans in Europe. We studied farmers’ practices at a local level on 22 farms from the Beauce area, France, with regard to habitat preferences of grey partridge, Perdix perdix L. We focused on the study of vegetation cover because it influences grey partridge’s reproduction and survival. The results revealed a high diversity of vegetation cover over the municipal territory. This high diversity can be explained by (1) the difference in the crops cultivated by the farmers, only wheat being cultivated by all the farmers; (2) the diversity of elementary crop sequences implemented, as many as 51 having been identified; and (3) the field size, which varies from 0.5 ha to 57 ha, with 54% of fields smaller than 10 ha. Altogether, this potentially creates six different habitat types, 32% of the arable land surveyed being a likely suitable habitat for the grey partridge. We found that irrigation was the main driving factor of vegetation cover diversity. Indeed irrigation controls the farms’ crop acreage, the crop sequences and their spatial pattern and field size. Nonetheless, irrigation practices show both positive, e.g. crop diversity, and negative aspects, e.g. large fields and clutch failure, for ground-nesting birds such as the grey partridge. Based on these results, a GIS modeling of the municipal landscape related to grey partridge’s habitat requirements is possible and would allow a deeper analysis of the impact of crop diversity on grey partridge populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson C.Q.A., Bradbury R.B., Evans A.D. (2001) Evidence for the effects of agricultural intensification on wild bird in the UK, RSPB Research report No. 3, Sandy, UK, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubry C., Papy F., Capillon A. (1998) Modelling decision-making processes for annual crop management, Agr. Syst. 56, 45–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier L. (2001) Elements for a skylark (Alauda arvensis) management plan, Game Wildlife Sci. 18, 45–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudry J., Papy F. (2001) The role of landscape heterogeneity, in: the sustainability of cropping systems, in: Nösberger J., Geiger H.H., Struik P.C. (Eds.), Crop Science — Progress and Prospects, CABI Publishing, Oxon, pp. 243–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaujouan V., Durand P., Ruiz L. (2001) Modelling the effect of the spatial distribution of agricultural practices on nitrogen fluxes in rural catchments, Ecol. Model. 137, 93–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bellon S., Doré T. (2005) Stability or fluctuations of crop sequences? in: Jacobsen S.E., Jensen C.R., Porter J.R. (Eds.), Proceedings of the VIII Congress of the European Society for Agronomy, 11–15 July 2004, Copenhagen, Denmark, 3 p.

  • Benton T.G., Bryant D.M., Cole L., Crick H.Q.P. (2002) Linking agricultural practice to insect and bird populations: a historical study over three decades, J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 673–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benton T.G., Vickery J.A., Wilson J.D. (2003) Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends Ecol. Evol. 18, 182–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BirdLife International (2004) Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status. — BirdLife International, BirdLife Conservation Series No. 12, UK.

  • Birkan M., Serre D., Pelard E., Skibnienski S. (1990) Effects of irrigation on adult mortality and reproduction of gray partridge in a wheat farming system, in: Church K.E., Warner R.E., Brady Perdix S.J. (Eds.), Gray partridge and ring-necked pheasant workshop, Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks, Emporia, KS, USA, pp. 257–271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bro E., Reitz F., Clobert J., Mayot P. (2000a) Nest-site selection of grey partridge (Perdix perdix) on agricultural lands in north-central France, Game Wildlife Sci. 17, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bro E., Reitz F., Clobert J., Mayot P. (2000b) Nesting success of grey partridges (Perdix perdix) on agricultural land in North-Central France, relation to nesting cover and predator abundance, Game Wildlife Sci. 17, 199–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bro E., Reitz F., Landry P. (2005) Grey partridge population status in central northern France: spatial variability in density and 1994–2004 trend, Wildlife Biol. 11, 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlain D.E., Fuller R.J., Bunce R.G.H., Duckworth J.C., Shrubb M. (2000) Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales, J. Appl. Ecol. 37, 771–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogliotti S., Rossing W.A.H., Van Ittersum M.K. (2003) ROTAT, a tool for systematically generating crop rotations, Eur. J. Agron. 19, 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francart C., Pivot J.M. (1998) Incidences de la structure du parcellaire sur le fonctionnement des exploitations agricoles en régions de bocage, Ingénieries EAT 14, 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyomarc’h J.C. (2003) Elements for a common quail (Coturnix c. coturnix) management plan, Game Wildlife Sci. 20, 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemeijer W.J.M., Blair M.J. (1997) (Eds.) The EBCC atlas of European Breeding Birds, Their distribution and abundance, Poyser, Great Britain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joannon A., Soudière V., Papy F., Martin P. (2006) Reducing runoff by managing crop location at the catchment level: considering agronomic constraints at farm level, Land Degrad. Dev. 17, 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leteinturier B., Herman J.L., de Longueville F., Quintin L., Oger R. (2006) Adaptation of a crop sequence indicator based on a land parcel management system, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 112, 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magdoff F.R., van Es H.M. (2000) (Eds.) Building Soils for Better Crops, Handbook Series Book 4. Sustainable Agric. Network, Beltsville, MD, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxime F., Mollet J.M., Papy F. (1995) Aide au raisonnement de l’assolement en grande culture, Cahiers Agric. 4, 351–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meynier F. (2004) Analyse des relations entre les densités de perdrix grises et les caractéristiques de l’habitat en plaine de grande culture à trois échelles spatiales, Mémoire de Diplôme d’Études Approfondies, Université Pierre et Marie Curie.

  • Meyer B.C., Mammen K., Grabaum R. (in press) A spatially explicit model for integrating species assessment into landscape planning as exemplified by the Corn Bunting (Emberiza calandra), J. Nature Conserv. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2007.01.001.

  • Morion P., Benoit M. (1990) Étude méthodologique d’un parcellaire d’exploitation agricole en tant que système, Agronomie 6, 499–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newton I. (2004) The recent decline of farmland bird populations in Britain: an appraisal of causal factors and conservation actions, Ibis 146, 579–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panek M. (2002) Space use, nesting sites and breeding success of grey partridge (Perdix perdix) in two agricultural management systems in western Poland, Game Wildlife Sci. 19, 313–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papy F. (2001) Interdépendance des systèmes de culture dans l’exploitation, in: Malézieux E., Trébuil G., Jaegger M. (Eds.), Modélisation des agroécosystèmes et aide à la décision, INRA Éditions/CIRAD, Coll. Repères, France, pp. 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rands M.R.W. (1985) Pesticide use on cereals and the survival of grey partridge chicks: a field experiment, J. Appl. Ecol. 22, 49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitz F. (2003) Le statut communal de la perdrix grise et de la perdrix rouge en France: résultats d’une enquête, Faune Sauvage 258, 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitz F., le Goff E., Fuzeau M. (2002) Landscape selection by grey partridge (Perdix perdix) for nesting in the fields of french cereal agrosystems, Game Wildlife Sci. 19, 209–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson R.A., Sutherland W.J. (2002) Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain, J. Appl. Ecol. 39, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocamora G., Yeatman-Berthelot D. (1999) Oiseaux menacés et à surveiller en France, Liste rouge et priorité, Populations, tendances, menaces et conservation, SEOF/LPO, France, 598 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serre D., Birkan M. (1985) Incidence des traitements insecticides sur les ressources alimentaires des poussins de la perdrix grise (Perdix Perdix L.) dans un agrosystème de Beauce, Gibier Faune Sauvage 4, 21–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCEES (Service central des enquêtes et études statistiques du Ministère de l’agriculture et de la pêche) (2000) Recensement général agricole.

  • Thenail C., Baudry J. (2004) Variation of farm spatial land use pattern according to the structure of hedgerow network (bocage) landscape: a case study in northeast Brittany, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 101, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vavra P., Colman D. (2003) The analysis of UK crop allocation at the farm level: implications for supply response analysis, Agr. Syst. 76, 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Joannon.

About this article

Cite this article

Joannon, A., Bro, E., Thenail, C. et al. Crop patterns and habitat preferences of the grey partridge farmland bird. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 28, 379–387 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008011

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2008011

Navigation