Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical destruction of weeds. A review

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Agronomy for Sustainable Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The various methods of mechanical removal of weeds in relation to their biology are reviewed. Depending on the stage of growth and type of weed, i.e. the depth at which new shoots can be formed and the ability to withstand burial, implements inflict damage on weeds in different ways: cutting, burial or uprooting. The various types of damage are exemplified. The three main methods of destruction are analysed and compared. These are: lethal damage, particularly effective in the case of plantlets; the exhaustion of reserves, effective where either deep or surface organs are targeted; and withering, of special interest where sub-surface parts are involved. Stored reserves can be depleted by either cutting the foliage, burying foliar parts or severely cutting up surface organs of propagation. Withering is accomplished by either cutting the roots, by exposing the roots to the air or by shaking out rootlets. It is shown that the kind of damage is strongly dependent upon the type of organ involved. Advances in our understanding of the way in which mortality occurs are discussed in the light of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anon. (1968) Weed control. Principles of plant and animal pest control, Vol. 2, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, 471 p.

  • Arny A.C. (1927) Successful eradication of perennial weeds, Rep. Ontario Agric. Exp. Union for 1926, 58–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arny A.C. (1932) Variations in the organic reserves in underground parts of five perennial weeds from late April to November, Minnesota State Tech. Bull. 84, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr C.G. (1940) Organic reserves in the roots of bindweed, J. Agr. Res. 60, 391–413.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdot G.W. (1984) Regeneration of yarrow (Achillea millefolium L.) rhizome fragments of different lenghts from various depths in the soil, Weed Res. 24, 421–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd J.W., Murray D.S. (1982) Growth and development of Silverleaf Nightshade Solanum eleagnifolium, Weed Sci. 30, 238–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenchley W.E. (1920) Weeds of farm land. Longman, Green and Co., London, 239 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckman P. (1855) On agricultural weeds, J. Roy. Ag. Soc. England 16, 359–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor R.J. (1968) The value of biological studies in weed control, Proc. 9th Br. Weed Control Conf. 3, 1129–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chicouene D. (1991) Les mauvaises herbes des champs de grandes cultures: inventaire, biologie, écologie, dynamique des infestations en Bretagne, Thèse, Université de Rennes, 148 + 64 p.

  • Chicouene D. (1992) Profondeur de formation des organes souterrains de propagation végétative et mode d’hivernage des mauvaises herbes pérennes en Bretagne, IXe Colloque Intern. Bio. Mauvaises Herbes, Association Nationale de Protection des Plantes, pp. 75–84.

  • Chicouene D. (1996) Typologie des périodes de levée des mauvaises herbes à partir d’organes végétatifs sous climat tempéré océanique, Xe Colloque Intern. Bio. Mauvaises Herbes, Association Nationale de Protection des Plantes, pp. 7–15.

  • Chicouene D. (1999) Déchaumage mécanique: prise en compte de la biologie des mauvaises herbes, Phytoma — la défense des végétaux 519, 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derscheid L.A., Nash R.L., Wicks G.A. (1961) Thistle control with cultivation, cropping and chemicals, Weeds 9, 90–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drottij S. (1929) Harrowing to control weeds in cereals, Meddel. Centralanst. Forsoksv. Jordbrusomradet 348, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans S.A. (1962) Weed destruction, a farmers’ and students’ guide, Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, 172 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fail H. (1956) The effects of rotary cultivation on the rhizomatous weeds, J. Agr. Eng. Res., 68–80.

  • F.A.O. (1958) Méthodes de désherbage, Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture, Rome, 208 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • F.A.O. (1988) La lutte raisonnée contre les mauvaises herbes, Organisation des Nations Unies pour l’alimentation et l’agriculture, Rome, 159 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer J.D., Evans S.A. (1970) Weed control handbook, Vol. 1, principles. 5th ed., Blackweil Scientific Publications, Oxford and Edinburgh, 494 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grummer G. (1963) Das Verhalten von Rhizomen der Quecke (Agropyron repens) gegen trockene Luft, Weed Res. 3, 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S. (1967) Experiments with Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv I. Development and growth, and the response to burial and response to burial at different developmental stages, Lantbr. högsk. Annlr. 33, 823–873.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S. (1969) Experiments with Sonchus arvensis L. I. Development and growth, and the response to burial and defoliation in different developmental stages, Lantbr. högsk. Annlr. 35, 989–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S. (1975) Perennial grass weeds in Europe, Symp. Status, Bio. Cont. Grassweeds Europe 2, 71–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S. (1982) Multiplication, growth and persistence of perennial weeds — in Biology and ecology of weeds, Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp. 123–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson S., Wallgren B. (1975) The control of rhizomatous grass weeds by soil cultivation in late summer and autumn under Swedish conditions, Symp. Status, Bio. Cont. Grassweeds Europe 2, 304–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchcock A.S., Clothier G.L. (1898) Vegetative propagation of perennial weeds, Kan. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 76, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogdson J.M. (1972) The response of of Canada Thistle ecotypes to 2,4 D, Amitrole, and intensive cultivation, Weed Sci. 18, 253–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilnicki R.D., Fertig S.N. (1962) Life history studies as related to weed control in the northeast. 3-Horse Nettle. Northeast Regional Publication, Agricultural Experiement Station, University of Rhode Island, 54 p.

  • Irmisch T. (1857) Ueber die Keimung und die Erneuerungsweise von Convolvulus sepium und C. arvensis, so wie über hypokotylische Adventivknospen bei krautartigen phanerogamen Pflanzen, Bot. Zeit. 15, 433–443, 449–462, 489–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones P.A., Blair A.M., Orson J.H. (1995) The effect of different types of physical damage to four weeds species, Brighton Crop Protection Conference — Weeds, pp. 653–658.

  • Jones P.A., Blair A.M., Orson J.H. (1996) Mechanical damage to kill weeds. Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, pp. 949–954.

  • King L.J. (1966) Weeds of the world, biology and control, Hill, London, 526 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klingman G.C. (1961) Weed control as a science, Wiley, New York, London, 421 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsmo E. (1930) Unkrauter im Ackerbau der Neuzeit. Biologische und practische Untersuchungen. J. Springer, Berlin, 580 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leakey R.R.B. (1981) Adaptative biology of vegetatively regenerating weeds, Adv. Appl. Biol. 6, 57–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson M.U., Wyse D.L., Spitzmueller J.M. (1987) Canada Thistle (Cirsium arvense) propagation from stem sections, Weed Sci. 35, 637–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann H., Cavers P.B. (1979) The regenerative capacity of root cuttings of Taraxacum officinale under natural conditions, Can. J. Bot. 57, 1783–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muencher W.C. (1955) Weeds, Macmillan Company, New York, 2nd ed., 560 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzic T.J. (1970) Weed biology and control, McGraw-Hill book company, New York, 273 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palis E. (1996) Les travaux mécaniques du sol post-moisson et la dynamique des rhizomes d’Elymus repens (L.) Gould dans la culture des pommes de terre, Xe colloque International sur la Biologie des mauvaises herbes, Dijon, pp. 373–378.

  • Pavlychenko T.K., Kirk L.E., Kossar W. (1940) Eradication of perennial weeds by the shallow cultivation method, Bulletin University of Saskatchewan, College of Agriculture 100, 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentiss A.N. (1889) On root propagation of Canada Thistle, Cornell Agr. Expt. Sta. Bul. 15, 190–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J. (1992) Testing harrows for mechanical control of annual weeds in agricultural crops, Weed Res. 32, 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J. (1996) Mechanical weed management, Second International Weed Control Congress, Copenhagen, pp. 943–948.

  • Robbins W.W., Crafts A.S., Raynor R.N. (1942) Weed control, a textbook and manual, McGraw-Hill book Company, New York, London, 542 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury S.E. (1962) The biology of garden weeds, Vincent Square, London, 50 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seely C.I. (1952) Controlling perennial weeds with tillage, Idaho Agr. Exp. Stat. Bull. 288

  • Timmons F.L. (1941) Results of bindweed control experiments at the Fort Hays Branch Station, Kansas Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 296, 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welton F.A., Morris V.H., Hartzler A.J. (1929) Organic food reserves in relation to the eradication of Canada Thistle, Ohio Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 441, 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimdahl R.L. (1993) Fundamentals of weed science, Academic Press, San Diego, 450 p.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Chicouene.

About this article

Cite this article

Chicouene, D. Mechanical destruction of weeds. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 27, 19–27 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2006012

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2006012

Navigation