Agronomy for Sustainable Development

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 13–18 | Cite as

Managing weeds with a dualistic approach of prevention and control. A review

Open Access
Review Article

Abstract

Scientists have theorized that weed management would be more efficient if prevention tactics were integrated with control tactics. The goals of prevention are to reduce weed community density and improve crop tolerance to weeds. Here we describe the impact of this approach in the semiarid steppe of the United States. As a result, producers have reduced herbicide inputs and costs by 50% compared to conventional practices. Critical factors for success with this approach are rotation design and no-till practices. Rotations comprised of two cool-season crops followed by two warm-season crops are the most disruptive of weed population growth. The impact of rotation design on weed community density is enhanced by no-till. Crop tolerance to weeds is improved by systems of cultural tactics. The tolerance is greatest when three tactics are combined together. This dualistic approach of prevention and control effectively controls weeds with four-crop rotations such that herbicides are not needed in some crops of the rotation. Weed density is so low that crop yield is not affected by weed interference. With this approach, herbicides are a choice rather than a requirement for cropping success in the semiarid steppe of the United States.

crop diversity rotation design no-till United States 

References

  1. Anderson R.L. (1998) Seedling emergence of winter annual grasses as affected by limited tillage and crop canopy, Weed Technol. 12, 262–267.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson R.L. (1999) Cultural strategies reduce weed densities in summer annual crops, Weed Technol. 13, 314–319.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson R.L. (2000a) A cultural systems approach eliminates the need for herbicides in semiarid proso millet, Weed Technol. 14, 602–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson R.L. (2000b) Cultural systems to aid weed management in semiarid corn, Weed Technol. 14, 630–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson R.L. (2003) An ecological approach to strengthen weed management in the semiarid Great Plains, Adv. Agron. 80, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson R.L. (2004) Impact of sub-surface tillage on weed dynamics in the Central Great Plains, Weed Technol. 18, 186–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson R.L. (2005a) A multi-tactic approach to manage weed population dynamics in crop rotations, Agron. J. 97, 1579–1583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderson R.L. (2005b) Improving sustainability of cropping systems in the Central Great Plains, J. Sustain. Agr. 26, 97–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anderson R.L., Bowman R.A., Nielsen D.C., Vigil M.F., Aiken R.M., Benjamin J.G. (1999) Alternative crop rotations for the central Great Plains, J. Prod. Agric. 12, 95–99.Google Scholar
  10. Banting J.D., Molberg E.S., Gephardt J.P. (1973) Seasonal emergence and persistence of green foxtail, Can. J. Plant Sci. 53, 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bernoux M., Cerri C.C., Cerri C.E.P., Neto M.S., Metay A., Perrin A.S., Scopel E., Razafimbelo T., Blavet D., Piccolo M.C., Pavei M., Milne E. (2006) Cropping systems, carbon sequestration and erosion in Brazil, a review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 26, 1–8. DOI: 10.1051/agro:2005055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bridges D.C. (1994) Impact of weeds on human endeavors, Weed Technol. 8, 392–395.Google Scholar
  13. Derksen D.A., Anderson R.L., Blackshaw R.E., Maxwell B. (2002) Weed dynamics and management strategies for cropping systems in the Northern Great Plains, Agron. J. 94, 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dieleman J.A., Mortensen D.A., Martin A.R. (1999) Influence of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and common sunflower (Helianthus annuus) density variation on weed management outcomes, Weed Sci. 47, 81–87.Google Scholar
  15. Donald W.W., Kitchen N.R., Sudduth K.A. (2001) Between-row mowing plus banded herbicide to control annual weeds and reduce herbicide use in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays), Weed Technol. 15, 576–584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Egley G.H., Williams R.D. (1990) Decline of weed seeds and seedling emergence over five years as affected by soil disturbance, Weed Sci. 38, 504–510.Google Scholar
  17. Farahani H.J., Peterson G.A., Westfall D.G. (1998) Dryland cropping intensification: a fundamental solution to efficient use of precipitation, Adv. Agron. 64, 197–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ferron P., Deguine J.P. (2005) Crop protection, biological control, habitat management and integrated farming. A review, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 25, 17–24. DOI: 10.1051/agro:2004050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forcella F., Eradat-Oskoui K., Wagner S.W. (1993) Application of weed seedbank ecology to low-input crop management, Ecol. Appl. 3, 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoffman D.W., Lavy T.L. (1978) Plant competition for atrazine, Weed Sci. 26, 94–99.Google Scholar
  21. Knodel J.J., Charlet L.D. (2002) Biology and integrated pest management of the sunflower stem weevil in the Great Plains, North Dakota State University Cooperative Extension Service Bulletin E-821, 8 p.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis W.J., van Lenteren J.G., Phatak S.C., Tumlinson J.H. (1997) A total system approach to sustainable pest management, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (USA) 94, 12243–12248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mortensen D.A., Bastiaans L., Sattin M. (2000) The role of ecology in the development of weed management systems: an outlook, Weed Res. 40, 49–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. O’Donovan J.T., Blackshaw R.E., Harker K.N., Clayton G.W. (2006) Wheat seeding rate influences herbicide performance in wild oat (Avena fatua L.), Agron. J. 98, 815–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pedigo L.P. (1995) Closing the gap between IPM theory and practice, J. Agr. Entomol. 12, 171–181.Google Scholar
  26. Popay A.I., Cox T.I., Ingle A., Kerr R. (1994) Effects of soil disturbance on weed seedling emergence and its long-term decline, Weed Res. 34, 403–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Roberts H.A. (1981) Seed banks in soils, Adv. Appl. Biol. 6, 1–55.Google Scholar
  28. Sagar G.R., Mortimer A.M. (1976) An approach to the study of the population dynamics of plants with special reference to weeds. Adv. Appl. Biol. 1, 1–47.Google Scholar
  29. Schweizer E.E., Westra P., Lybecker D.W. (1992) Controlling weeds in corn (Zea mays) rows with an in-row cultivator versus decisions made by a computer model, Weed Sci. 42, 593–600.Google Scholar
  30. Streibig J.C. (1979) Numerical methods illustrating the phytosociology of crops in relation to weed flora, J. Appl. Ecol. 16, 577–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thomas A.G., Banting J.D., Bowes G. (1986) Longevity of green foxtail seeds in a Canadian prairie soil, Can. J. Plant Sci. 66, 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weber E., Gut D. (2005) A survey of weeds that are increasingly spreading in Europe, Agron. Sustain. Dev. 25, 109–121. DOI: 10.105 l/agro:2004061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wicks G.A., Crutchfield D.A., Burnside O.C. (1994) Influence of wheat (Triticum aestivum) straw mulch and metolachlor on corn (Zea mays) growth and yield, Weed Sci. 42, 141–147.Google Scholar
  34. Winkle M.E., Leavitt J.R.C., Burnside O.C. (1981) Effects of weed density on herbicide absorption and bioactivity, Weed Sci. 29, 405–409.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer S+B Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.USDABrookingsUSA

Personalised recommendations