Agronomy for Sustainable Development

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 503–515 | Cite as

Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review

  • A. Wezel
  • S. Bellon
  • T. Doré
  • C. Francis
  • D. Vallod
  • C. David
Review Article

Abstract

Agroecology involves various approaches to solve actual challenges of agricultural production. Though agroecology initially dealt primarily with crop production and protection aspects, in recent decades new dimensions such as environmental, social, economic, ethical and development issues are becoming relevant. Today, the term ‘agroecology’ means either a scientific discipline, agricultural practice, or political or social movement. Here we study the different meanings of agroecology. For that we analyse the historical development of agroecology. We present examples from USA, Brazil, Germany, and France. We study and discuss the evolution of different meanings agroecology. The use of the term agroecology can be traced back to the 1930s. Until the 1960s agroecology referred only as a purely scientific discipline. Then, different branches of agroecology developed. Following environmental movements in the 1960s that went against industrial agriculture, agroecology evolved and fostered agroecological movements in the 1990s. Agroecology as an agricultural practice emerged in the 1980s, and was often intertwined with movements. Further, the scales and dimensions of agroecological investigations changed over the past 80 years from the plot and field scales to the farm and agroecosystem scales. Actually three approaches persist: (1) investigations at plot and field scales, (2) investigations at the agroecosystem and farm scales, and (3) investigations covering the whole food system. These different approaches of agroecological science can be explained by the history of nations. In France, agroecology was mainly understood as a farming practice and to certain extent as a movement, whereas the corresponding scientific discipline was agronomy. In Germany, agroecology has a long tradition as a scientific discipline. In the USA and in Brazil all three interpretations of agroecology occur, albeit with a predominance of agroecology as a science in the USA and a stronger emphasis on movement and agricultural practice in Brazil. These varied meanings of the term agroecology cause confusion among scientists and the public, and we recommend that those who publish using this term be explicit in their interpretation.

agroecosystem Brazil food system France Germany rural development scientific discipline sustainable agriculture USA 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abramovay R (2007) Estartégias alternativas para a extensao rurale suas conseqüências para os processos de avaliaçao, Proceedings XLV congreso da SOBER (Soc. Bras. Economia, Adm. e Sociologia Rural)— “Conhecimentos para a Agricultura do Futuro”, Londrina, 22–25 July 2007, 15 p.Google Scholar
  2. AGRECOL (2008) Networking sites. Information management and networking for ecological agriculture. http://www.agrecol.de/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=44&Itemid=51 (accessed January 2008).Google Scholar
  3. Agronomes & Vétérinaires Sans Frontières (2007) Projet Agroécologie — Manakara. http://www.avsf.org/fr/article.php?rub_id=110&art_id=194 (accessed June 2007).Google Scholar
  4. Altieri M.A. (1989a) Agroecology: A new research and development paradigm for world agriculture, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 27, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Altieri M.A. (1989b) El “estado del arte” de la agroécologia y su contribución al desarrollo rural en América Latina, in: Cadenas Marin A. (Ed.), Agricultura y desarrollo sostenible. Madrid: MAPA (Serie Estudios), pp. 151–203.Google Scholar
  6. Altieri M.A. (1993) Ethnosience and biodiversity: key elements in the design and of sustainable pest management systems for small farmers in developing countries, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 46, 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Altieri M.A. (1995) Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA, 433 p.Google Scholar
  8. Altieri M.A. (2002) Agroecology: the science of natural resource management for poor farmers in marginal environments, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 93, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Altieri M.A. (2004) Agroecology versus Ecoagriculture: balancing food production and biodiversity conservation in the midst of social inequity. (http://www.wildfarmalliance.org/resources/ECOAG.pdf).Google Scholar
  10. Arrignon J. (1987) Agro-écologie des zones arides et sub-humides, in: G.-P. Masonneuve & Larose et ACCT (Eds.), Paris, France, 283 p.Google Scholar
  11. Azzi G. (1928) Agricultural ecology (in Italian), Edition Tipografia Editrice Torinese, Turin, 237 p.Google Scholar
  12. Azzi G. (1942) Agricultural ecology (in Italian), Edition Dante Aleghieri, Città di Castello, 204 p.Google Scholar
  13. Azzi G. (1956) Agricultural ecology, Constable & Company, London, 424 p.Google Scholar
  14. Bellon S., de Abreu L. (2006) Rural social development: small-scale horticulture in Sao Paulo, Brazil, in: Holt G.C., Reed M. (Eds.), Sociological perspectives of organic agriculture: from pioneer to policy, CABI Publishing, pp. 243–259.Google Scholar
  15. Bensin B.M. (1928) Agroecological characteristics description and classification of the local corn varieties chorotypes. Book, (Publisher unknown so far).Google Scholar
  16. Bensin B.M. (1930) Possibilities for international cooperation in agroecological investigations, Int. Rev. Agr. Mo. Bull. Agr. Sci. Pract. (Rome) 21, 277–284.Google Scholar
  17. Bensin B.M. (1935) Agroecological exploration in the Soto La Marina Region, Mexico, Geogr. Rev. 25, 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bland W.L., Bell M.M. (2007) A holon approach to agroecology, Int. J. Agr. Sustain. 5, 280–294.Google Scholar
  19. Brandenburg A. (2002) Movimento agroecologico: trajetoria, contradiçoes e perspetivas. Revista Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente n° 6, July–Dec 2002, Ed. UFPR.Google Scholar
  20. Brauns A. (1985) Agrarökologie im Spannungsfeld des Umweltschutzes, Agentur Pedersen, Braunschweig, Germany, 395 p.Google Scholar
  21. Brüggemeier F.-J., Engels J.I. (2005) Natur- und Umweltschutz nach 1945. Konzepte, Konflikte, Kompetenzen, Campus Verlag, Frankfurt, Germany, 379 p.Google Scholar
  22. Buttel F.H. (2007) Envisioning the future development of farming in the USA: agroecology between extinction and multifunctionality. http://www.agroecology.wisc.edu/downloads/buttel.pdf (accessed November 2007)Google Scholar
  23. Byé P., Schmidt V.B., Schmidt W. (2002) Transferência de dispositivos de reconhecimento da agricultura orgânica e apropriação local: uma análise sobre a Rede Ecovida. Desenvolvimiento e Meio Ambiente, Curitiba 6, 81–93.Google Scholar
  24. Canuto J.C. (1998) Agricultura ecologica en Brasil: perspectivas socioecologicas, Thesis, Universidad de Cordoba, Spain, 200 p.Google Scholar
  25. Capillon A. (2006) Agriculture durable: faut-il repenser les systèmes de culture? in: Démeter 2006, Économie et stratégies agricoles, Club Démeter, Paris.Google Scholar
  26. Caporal F.R., Costabeber J.A. (2000) Agroecologia e desenvolvimento rural sustentável: perspectivas par uma nova Exentsão Rural, Agroecologia e Desenvolviemento Rural Sustentável 1, 16–37.Google Scholar
  27. Caporal F.R., Morales Hernandez J. (2004) Rio Grande do Sul: vers l’agroécologie, L’Écologiste 5, 40.Google Scholar
  28. Caporal F.R., Costabeber J.A., Paulus G. (2006) Agroecologia: matriz disciplinar ou novo paradigma para o desenvolvimento rural sustentavel, in: 3rd Congreso Brasileiro de Agroecologia, Florianopolis, Brazil, Anais: CBA, 25 p.Google Scholar
  29. Caporali F. (1991) Ecologia per l’agricoltura. UTET Libreria, Torino, Italy.Google Scholar
  30. Carson R. (1964) The silent spring, Fawcett, New York, USA, 304 p.Google Scholar
  31. CIRAD (Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développement) (2007) Réseau Agroécologie au CIRAD. http://agroecologie.cirad.fr/index.php?rubrique=dico&langue=fr#agroecologie (edited January 2007).Google Scholar
  32. Conway G.R. (1987) The properties of agroecosystems, Agr. Syst. 24, 95–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cox G.W., Atkins M.D. (1979) Agricultural ecology: an analysis of world food production systems, W.H. Freeman and Sons, San Francisco, 721 p.Google Scholar
  34. Dalgaard T., Hutchings N.J., Porter J.R (2003) Agroecology, scaling and interdisciplinarity, Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 100, 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Department of Crop Science, Section Agroecology, University of Göttingen (2008) Introduction. http://wwwuser.gwdg.de/~uaoe/Agroecology.html (accessed January 2008).Google Scholar
  36. Doré T., Le Bail M., Martin P., Ney B., Roger-Estrade J. (Eds.) (2006) L’agronomie aujourd’hui, Éditions Quae, INRA, Versailles, France, 367 p.Google Scholar
  37. Douglass G. (Ed.) (1984) Agricultural sustainability in a changing world order, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA, 282 p.Google Scholar
  38. EMBRAPA (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária) (2006) Maraco referencial em agroecologia. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, Brasília, 70 p.Google Scholar
  39. Editors of Terre & Humanisme (2007) L’agroécologie, vers une révolution agriculturelle, Journal de l’Association Terre & Humanisme 56, 4–11.Google Scholar
  40. Francis C., Lieblein G., Gliessman S., Breland T.A., Creamer N., Harwood, Salomonsson L., Helenius J., Rickerl D., Salvador R., Wiedenhoeft M., Simmons S., Allen P., Altieri M., Flora C., Poincelot, R. (2003) Agroecology: The ecology of food systems, J. Sustain. Agr. 22, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Friederichs K. (1930) Die Grundfragen und Gesetzmäßigkeiten der land- und forstwirtschaftlichen Zoologie. Vol. 1: Ökologischer Teil, Vol. 2: Wirtschaftlicher Teil. Verlagsbuchhandlung Paul Parey, Berlin, Germany, 417 and 443 p.Google Scholar
  42. Gilman C.P. (1992) Herland and selected stories. Signet Classics, Penguin Putnam, Middlesex, England, UK.Google Scholar
  43. Gliessman S.R. (Ed.) (1990) Agroecology: researching the ecological basis for sustainable agriculture, Ecological Studies Series No. 78, Springer, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Gliessman S.R. (1997) Agroecology: Ecological Processes in Sustainable Agriculture, CRC Press, 384 p.Google Scholar
  45. Gliessman S.R. (2007) Agroecology: the ecology of sustainable food systems, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis, New York, USA, 384 p.Google Scholar
  46. Gliessman S.R., Garcia-Espinosa R., Amador M. (1981) The ecological basis for the application of traditional agricultural technology in the management of tropical agroecosystems, Agro-ecosystems 7, 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Guthman J. (2000) An agro-ecological assessment of grower practices in California, Agr. Human Values 17, 257–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hanson H.C. (1939) Ecology in agriculture, Ecology 20, 111–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hecht S.B. (1995) The evolution of agroecological thought, in: Altieri M.A. (Ed.), Agroecology: the science of sustainable agriculture, Westview Press, Boulder, CO, USA, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  50. Hénin S. (1967) Les acquisitions techniques en production végétale et leurs applications, Économie Rurale, SFER, Paris, France, pp. 31–44.Google Scholar
  51. Heydemann B. (1953) Agrarökologische Problematik, dargetan an Untersuchungen über die Tierwelt der Bodenoberfläche der Kulturen, Ph.D. thesis, University of Kiel, Germany.Google Scholar
  52. Hill S.B. (1985) Redesigning the food system for sustainability, Alternatives 12, 32–36.Google Scholar
  53. Janzen D.H. (1973) Tropical agroecosystems, Science 182, 1212–1219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Klages K.H.W. (1928) Crop ecology and ecological crop geography in the agronomic curriculum, J. Am. Soc. Agron. 10, 336–353.Google Scholar
  55. Klages K.H.W. (1942) Ecological crop geography, Macmillan Company, New York, 615 p.Google Scholar
  56. Koch W., Sauerborn J., Kunisch M., Pülschen L. (1990) Gedanken zur Agrarökologie in den Tropen und Subtropen, in: Koch W., Sauerborn J., Kunisch M., Pülschen (Eds.), Agrarökologie und Pflanzenschutz in den Tropen und Subtropen, PLITS 8 (2): 109–130, University of Hohenheim, Germany.Google Scholar
  57. LEISA (2008) Network of magazines on low external input and sustainable agriculture. http://www.leisa.info (accessed November 2008).Google Scholar
  58. Lieblein G., Francis C., Barth Eide W., Torjusen H., Solberg S., Salomonsson L., Lund V., Ekblad G., Persson P., Helenius J., Loiva M., Sepannen L., Kahiluoto H., Porter J., Olsen H., Sriskandarajah N., Mikk M., Flora C. (2000) Future Education in Ecological Agriculture and Food Systems: A Student-Faculty Evaluation and Planning Process, J. Sustain. Agr. 16, 49–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lieblein G., Breland A., Østergard E., Salomonsson L., Francis C. (2007a) Educational perspectives in agroecology: steps on a dual learning ladder toward responsible action. NACTA Journal March 2007, 37–44.Google Scholar
  60. Lieblein G., Østergaard E., Francis C. (2007b). Becoming an agroecologist through action education, Int. J. Agr. Sustain. 2, 147–153.Google Scholar
  61. Lutzenberger J. (1976) Fim do futuro? Manifesto Ecológico Brasileiro. Porto Alegre (Rio Grande do Sul). Movimento (L&PM Ed).Google Scholar
  62. Lutzenberger J. (1981) Fundamentos Ecológicos da Agricultura Biológica. Sociedade de Agronomia do Rio Grande do Sul. Ed. 1° Curso de Agricultura Biológica, Porto Alegre, pp. 52–71.Google Scholar
  63. Martin K., Sauerborn J. (2006) Agrarökologie, Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany, UTB 2793, 297 p.Google Scholar
  64. MDA (2004) Ministério do Desenvolvimento Agrário, Secretaria de Agricultura Familiar, Grupo de Trabalho Ater. “Política Nacional de Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural: Versão Final: 25/05/2004”, Brasilia, 12 p.Google Scholar
  65. Norgaard R.B. (1984) Traditional agricultural knowledge: past performance, future prospects, and institutional implications, Am. J. Agr. Econ. 66, 875–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Oliveira D de, Santos LCR dos (2004) Caderno de formação: certificação participativa de produtos ecológicos. Rede Ecovida de Agroecologia (Fioranopolis, Santa Catarina), 48 p.Google Scholar
  67. Piercy M. (1976) Woman on the edge of time. Fawcett Books, New York.Google Scholar
  68. Rabhi P. (2007) Agroécologie. http://www.pierrerabhi.org/blog/index.php?category/Agroecologie (accessed July 2007).Google Scholar
  69. Raza S.A (2007) Forces of globalisation, dynamism and diversity in the agro-ecological production system: a study in sustainable development from a hill tribe in Western Himalayas, Int. J. Agr. Res. Gov. Ecol. 6, 666–678.Google Scholar
  70. Robin P., Aeschlimann J.P., Feller C. (Eds.) (2007) Histoire et agronomie: entre ruptures et durée, IRD Éditions, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Paris, 512 p.Google Scholar
  71. Rosset P., Altieri M. (1997) Agroecology versus input substitution: A fundamental contradiction of sustainable agriculture, Soc. Nat. Res. 10, 283–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Ruiz-Rosado O. (2006) Agroecología: una disciplina que tienda a la transdisciplina, Interciencia 31, 140–145.Google Scholar
  73. Schilke K. (ed) (1992) Agrarökologie, Metzler Schulbuchverlag, Hannover, Germany, 264 p.Google Scholar
  74. Sebillotte M. (1974) Agronomie et agriculture, analyse des tâches de l’agronome, Cahier ORSTOM, série biologie 24, 3–25.Google Scholar
  75. Sevilla Guzmán E. (2001) Agroecologia y desarrollo. rural sustentable: una propuesta desde Latino América, in: Sarandon S. (Ed.), Agroecologia. El camino hacia una agricultura sustentable, Ediciones Cientificas Americanas, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 25 p.Google Scholar
  76. Sevilla Guzmán E. (2002) A perspectiva sociológica em Agroecologia: uma sistematicação de sus méthodos et téchnicas, Agroecol. e Desenvolv. Rural Sustent. 3, 18–28.Google Scholar
  77. Sociedad Cientifica LatinoAmericana de Agroecologia (SOCLA) (2007) Mision y objetivos de SOCLA. http://agroecologia.pbwiki.com/ (accessed September 2007).Google Scholar
  78. Tischler W. (1950) Ergebnisse und Probleme der Agrarökologie, Schrift. Landwirtschaft. Fakultät Kiel 3, 71–82.Google Scholar
  79. Tischler W. (1953) Neue Ergebnisse agrarökologischer Forschung und ihre Bedeutung für den Pflanzenschutz, Mitteilung. Biol. Zentralanst. 75, 7–11.Google Scholar
  80. Tischler W. (1959) Stand und Möglichkeiten agrarökologischer Forschung, Naturwissenschaft. Rundschau 12, 291–295.Google Scholar
  81. Tischler W. (1961) Pflanzenschutz in Nordwestdeutschland aus agrarökologischer Sicht, Schrift. Landwirtschaft. Fakultät Kiel 28, 55–70.Google Scholar
  82. Tischler W. (1965) Agrarökologie. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena, Germany, 499 p.Google Scholar
  83. Warner K.D. (2005) Extending agroecology: grower participation in partnerships is key social learning, Renew. Agr. Food Syst. 21, 84–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Warner K.D. (2007a) Agroecology in action: extending alternative agriculture through social networks, MIT Press, USA, 273 p.Google Scholar
  85. Warner K.D. (2007b) The quality of sustainability: agroecological partnerships and the geographic branding of California wine grapes, J. Rural Stud. 23, 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wikipedia (2008) Agroécologie. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agroecologie (accessed November 2008).Google Scholar
  87. Wojtkowski P.A. (2002) Agroecological perspectives in agronomy, forestry and agroforestry, Science Publishers, Enfield, USA, 356 pp.Google Scholar
  88. Zonin W.G. (2007) Transição agroecológica: modalidades e estágios na RMC (Curitiba Metropolitan Region), Tese de Doutorado. Curso de Doutorado em Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento, Universidade Federal do Paraná, 282 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer S+B Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Wezel
    • 1
  • S. Bellon
    • 2
  • T. Doré
    • 3
  • C. Francis
    • 4
  • D. Vallod
    • 1
  • C. David
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Agroecosystems, Environment and ProductionISARALyon Cedex 07France
  2. 2.UR 767 ÉcodéveloppementINRA-SADAvignon Cedex 9France
  3. 3.UMR 211 INRA/AgroParisTechAgroParisTechThiverval-GrignonFrance
  4. 4.Department of Agronomy and HorticultureUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations