Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patient preferences for care by general internists and specialists in the ambulatory setting

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients’ preferences for care by general internists and specialists for common medical conditions.

DESIGN: Telephone interview.

SETTING: A convenience sample of general internal medicine practices at 10 eastern academic medical centers.

PATIENT/PARTICIPANTS: A probability sample of 314 participants who had at least one visit with their primary care physician during the preceding 2 years.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Items addressed patients’ attitudes concerning continuity of care, preferences for care by general internists or specialists for common medical problems, and perceptions about the competency of general internists and specialists to manage these problems. Continuity was important to participants, with 63% reporting they preferred having one doctor. Respondents were willing to wait 3 or 4 days to see their regular doctor (85%) and wanted their doctor to see them in the emergency department (77%) and monitor their care while in the hospital (94%). A majority (>60%) preferred care from their regular doctor for a variety of new conditions. Though respondents valued continuity, 84% felt it was important to be able to seek medical care from any type of physician without a referral, and 74% responded that if they needed to see a specialist, they were willing to pay out-of-pocket to do so. Although most participants (98%) thought their regular doctor was able to take care of usual medical problems, the majority through that specialists were better able to care for allergies (79%) and better able to prescribe medications for depression (65%) and low-back pain (72%).

CONCLUSIONS: Participants preferred to see their general internist despite their perceptions that specialists were more competent in caring for the conditions we examined. However, they wanted unrestricted access to specialists to supplement care provided by general internists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. How is your doctor treating your? Consumer Rep. February 1995:81–8.

  2. Lupton D, Donaldson C, Lloyd P. Caveat emptor or blissful ignorance? Patients and the consumerist ethos. Soc Sci Med. 1991;33(5):559–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lazare A, Eisenthal S, Wasserman L. The customer approach to patienthood. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1975;32:553–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang VL, Reiter H, Lentz GA, Whaples GC. An approach to consumer-patient activation in health maintenance. Public Health Rep. 1975;90(5):449–54.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sanchez-Menegay C, Hudes ES, Cummings SR. Patient expectations and satisfaction with medical care for upper respiratory infections. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:432–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kravitz RL. Patients’ expectations for medical care: an expanded formulation based on review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 1996;53:3–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kravitz RL. Internal medicine patients’ expectations for care during office visits. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9:75–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Joos SK, Hickam DH, Borders LM. Patients’ desires and satisfaction in general medicine clinics. Public Health Rep. 1993;108(6):751–9.

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weingarten SR, Stone E, Green, A, et al. A study of patient satisfaction and adherence to preventive care practice guidelines. Am J Med. 1995;99:590–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Franks P, Clancy CM. Referrals of adult patients from primary care: demographic disparities and their relationship to HMO insurance. J Fam Pract. 1997;45(1):45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Donelan K. What patients really think of managed care. Managed Care. February 1996:17–24.

  12. Gabriel SE. Primary care: specialists or generalists. Mayo Clin Proc. 1996;71:415–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cram P, Ettinger WH. Generalists or specialists: who does it better? Physician Exec. 1998;24(1):40–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kravitz RL, Greenfield S, Rogers W, et al. Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care. JAMA. 1992;267(12):1617–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexander GC, Sehgal AR. Dialysis patient ratings of the quality of medical care. Am J Kidney Dis. 1998;32(2):284–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Owen SA, Maeyens E Jr, Weary PE. Patients’ opinions regarding direct access to dermatologic specialty care. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1997;36:250–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Uhlmann RF, Carter WB, Inui TS. Fulfillment of patient requests in a general medicine clinic. Am J Public Health. 1984;74(3):257–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blecher MB. The gate swings wider. Hosp Health Netw. 1997;7(12):65–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo C, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients’ perceived involvement in care scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:29–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Blum MJ. The relationship between patients’ satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Med Care. 1989;27(11):1027–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Brody DS, Miller SM, Lerman CE, Smith DG, Caputo GC. Patient perception of involvement in medical care: relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:506–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Frowick B, Shank JC, Doherty WJ, Powell TA. What do patients really want? redefining a behavioral science curriculum for family physicians. J Fam Pract. 1986;23(2):141–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper PF, Nichols LM, Taylor AK. Patient choice of physician: do health insurance and physician characteristics matter? Inquiry. 1996;33:237–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Fletcher RH, O’Malley MS, Earp JA, et al. Patients’ priorities for medical care. Med Care. 1983;21(2):234–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hulka BS, Kupper LL, Daly MB, Cassel JC, Schoen F. Correlates of satisfaction and dissatisfaction with medical care: a community perspective. Med Care. 1975;13(8):648–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Safran DG, Taira DA. Rogers WH, Kosinski M, Ware JE, Tarlov AR. Linking primary care performance to outcomes of care. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(3):213–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Davis EL, Albino JE, Tedesco LA, Portenoy BS, Ortman LF. Expectations and satisfaction of denture patients in a university clinic. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55(1):59–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Samuelson RJ. Having it all. Newsweek. September 1998:71–72.

  29. ACP-ASIM. Doctors for adults campaign. Available at: www.acponline.org/public/docs4adults.

  30. Walker JD, Griffiths ID, Leon CM. Referrals to a rheumatology unit: an evaluation of the views of patients, general practitioners, and consultants. Ann Rheum Dis. 1991;50:926–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Levinson DF. Toward full disclosure of referral restrictions and financial incentives by prepaid health plans. N Engl J Med. 1987;317(27):1729–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carmen L. Lewis MD.

Additional information

This work was supported in part by grant 2D28PE54004 from the Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration, to the Faculty Development Program for General Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and by grant 52285 from the Summa Health System, Akron, Ohio.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, C.L., Wickstrom, G.C., Kolar, M.M. et al. Patient preferences for care by general internists and specialists in the ambulatory setting. J GEN INTERN MED 15, 75–83 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.05089.x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.05089.x

Key words

Navigation