Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Racial differences in patients’ perceptions of debilitated health states

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine health utility scores for specific debilitated health states and to identify whether race or other demographic differences predict significant variation in these utility scores.

DESIGN: Utility analysis.

SETTING: A community hospital general internal medicine clinic, a private internal medicine practice, and a private pulmonary medicine practice.

PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-four consecutive patients aged 50 to 75 years awaiting appointments. In order to participate, patients at the pulmonary clinic had to meet prespecified criteria of breathing impairment.

MEASUREMENTS: Individuals’ strength of preference concerning specific states of limited physical function as measured by the standard gamble technique.

MAIN RESULTS: Mean utility scores used to quantitate limitations in physical function were extremely low. Using a scale for which 0 represented death and 1.0 represented normal health, limitation in activities of daily living was rated 0.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13, 0.25), tolerance of only bed-to-chair ambulation 0.17 (95% CI 0.11, 0.23), and permanent nursing home placement 0.16 (95% CI 0.10, 0.22). Bivariate analysis identified female gender and African-American race as predictors of higher utility scores (p ≦ .05). In multiple regression analysis, only race remained statistically significant (p ≦ .02 for all three outcome variables).

CONCLUSION: Comparisons of African-American values with those of whites concerning defined states of debility demonstrate greater than threefold increases in utility scores. This finding suggests that racial differences need to be taken into account when studying the effects of medical interventions on quality of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fryback DG, Dasbach EJ, Klein R, et al. The Beaver Dam health outcomes study: initial catalogue of health-state quality factors. Med Decis Making. 1993;13:89–102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Torrance G, Thomas W, Sackett D. A utility maximization model for the evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972;7(2):118–33.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Meara J, McNutt R, Evans A, Moore S, Downs S. A decision analysis of streptokinase plus heparin as compared with heparin alone for deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1864–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Disch D, Greenberg M, Holzberger P, Malenka D, Birkmeyer J. Managing chronic atrial fibrillation: a Markov decision analysis comparing warfarin, quinidine, and low-dose amiodarone. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120:449–57.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gage B, Cardinalli A, Albers G, Owens D. Cost-effectiveness of warfarin and aspirin for prophylaxis of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. JAMA. 1995;274:1839–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ebell M, Warbasse L, Brenner C. Evaluation of the dyspeptic patient: a cost utility study. J Fam Pract. 1997;44:545–55.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Engle V, Graney M. Black and white female nursing home residents: does health status differ? J Gerontology. 1995;50A(4):M190–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. McKinley E, Garrett J, Evans A, Danis M. Differences in end-of-life decision making among black and white ambulatory cancer patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:651–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gold M, Franks P, Erickson P. Assessing the health of the nation: the predictive validity of a preference-based measure and selfrated health. Med Care. 1996;34:163–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson R, Wolinsky F. Gender, race, and health: the structure of health status among older adults. Gerontologist. 1994;34(1):24–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tell G, Shumaker S, Mittlemark M, Russell G, Hylander B, Burkart J. Social support and health-related quality of life in black and white dialysis patients. ANNA J. 1995;22(3):301–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bechard D, Wetstein L. Assessment of exercise oxygen consumption as preoperative criterion for lung resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44:344–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith T, Kinasewitz G, Tucker W, Spillers W, George R. Exercise capacity as a predictor of post-thoracotomy morbidity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1984;129:730–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morice R, Peters E, Ryan M, Putnam J, Ali M, Roth J. Exercise testing in the evaluation of patients at high risk for complications from lung resection. Chest. 1992;101:356–61.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bolliger C, Wyser C, Roser H, Soler M, Perruchoud A. Lung scanning and exercise testing for the prediction of postoperative performance in lung resection candidates at increased risk for complications. Chest. 1995;108:341–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kearney D, Lee T, Reilly J, Decamp M, Sugarbaker D. Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection: importance of predicted pulmonary function. Chest. 1994;105:753–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Busch E, Verazin G, Antkowiak J, Driscoll D, Takita H. Pulmonary complications in patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung carcinoma. Chest. 1994;105:760–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferguson M, Reeder L, Mick R. Optimizing selection of patients for major lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;109:275–83.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferguson M, Little L, Rizzo L, et al. Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity and mortality after pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1988;96:894–900.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nord E. Methods for quality adjustment of life years. Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(5):559–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Simon J, Bruce P. Resampling: a tool for everyday statistical work. Chance: New Directions for Statistics and Computing. 1991;4(1):22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nease RF Jr, Kneeland T, O’Connor GT, et al. Variation in patient utilities for outcomes of the management of chronic stable angina. JAMA. 1995;273:1185–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Markides K. Aging, religiosity, and adjustment: a longitudinal analysis. J Gerontol. 1983;38(5):621–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Levin J, Taylor R, Chatters L. Race and gender differences in religiosity among older adults: findings from four national surveys. J Gerontol. 1994;49(3):S137–45.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Thompson M. Willingness to pay and accept risks to cure chronic disease. Am J Public Health. 1986;76(4):392–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cykert, S., Joines, J.D., Kissling, G. et al. Racial differences in patients’ perceptions of debilitated health states. J GEN INTERN MED 14, 217–222 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00320.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00320.x

Key words

Navigation