Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of ambulatory utilization review on referrals from generalists to specialists

  • Brief Reports
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied whether ambulatory utilization review (UR) alters how many patients internal medicine residents refer to subspecialists, and whether the effect persists without reinforcement. We compared referral rates of residents from a firm that held UR meetings (intervention firm residents, n=20) with those of residents from a firm that did not (control firm residents, n=21). We then compared referral rates of 17 intervention firm residents while they were participating in UR with their rates after not participating for at least 4 weeks. Intervention firm residents submitted 30% fewer referrals than control firm residents (9% vs 13%, p=.05). However, the effect was short-lived; after 4 weeks without UR, intervention firm resident referral rates were similar to control firm referral rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Wilkin D, Smith A. Explaining variation in general practitioner referrals to hospital. Fam Pract. 1987;4:160–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Calman NS, Hyman RB, Licht W. Variability in consultation rates and practitioner level of diagnostic certainty. J Fam Pract. 1992;35(1):31–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fertig A, Roland M, King H, Moore T. Understanding variation in rates of referral among general practitioners: are inappropriate referrals important and would guidelines help to reduce rates? BMJ. 1993;307:1467–70.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cummins RO, Jarman B, White PM. Do general practitioners have different “referral thresholds”? BMJ. 1981;282:1037–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Donohoe MT, Kravitz RL, Chandra R, Chen A, Humphries N. Reasons for and avoidability of referrals from generalists to specialists. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(suppl):68.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Elwyn JG, Stott NCH. Avoidable referrals? Analysis of 170 consecutive referrals to secondary care. BMJ. 1994;309:576–8.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emmanuel J, Walter N. Referrals from general practice to hospital outpatient departments: a strategy for improvement. BMJ. 1989;299:722–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grace JF, Armstrong D. Referral to hospital: perceptions of patients, general practitioners and consultants about necessity and suitability of referral. Fam Pract. 1987;4:170–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenfield S, Nelson EC, Zubkoff M, et al. Variations in resource utilization among medical specialties and systems of care. JAMA. 1992;267:1624–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ginsburg PB, LeRoy LB, Hammons FT. Medicare physician payment reform. Health Aff. (Millwood). 1990;9:178–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kerr EA, Mittman BS, Hays RD, Siu AL, Leake B, Brook RH. Managed care and capitation in California: how do physicians at financial risk control their own utilization? Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:500–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chao J, Galazka S, Stange K, Fedirko T. A prospective review system of nonurgent consultation requests in a Family Medicine residency practice. Fam Med. 1993;25:570–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tierney WM, Miller ME, McDonald CJ. The effect on test ordering of informing physicians of the charges for outpatient diagnostic tests. N Engl J Med. 1990;322:1499–1504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reynolds GA, Chitnis JG, Roland MO. General practitioner outpatient referrals: do good doctors refer more patients to hospital? BMJ. 1991;302:1250–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Haines A, Armstrong D. Developing referral guidelines. In: Roland M, Coulter A, eds. Hospital Referrals. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1992:163–78.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grimm, C.T., Gomez, A.G. Effect of ambulatory utilization review on referrals from generalists to specialists. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 778–780 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00232.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00232.x

Key words

Navigation