Abstract
We studied 63 randomly selected third-year students who split their 10-week medicine clerkship between ambulatory and inpatient components. Compared with their inpatient experience, during the ambulatory rotation, the 63 students felt more like doctors, more responsible for patients, and more able to know and help their patients. Students reported that ambulatory attending staff appeared happier and less stressed, and did not embarrass them as frequently. Compared with their 619 “inpatient” classmates, these 63 “ambulatory” students scored as well on the medicine examination, and were as likely to receive honors (44% vs 41%), and to choose internal medicine residencies (35% vs 34%). In conclusion, students experienced better relationships with their patients and teachers during the ambulatory rotation, which was academically comparable to the inpatient experience.
References
Perkoff GT. Teaching clinical medicine in the ambulatory setting: an idea whose time may have finally come. N Engl J Med. 1986;314:27–31.
Pagnaro L. An experiment in ambulatory student education. SGIM News. 1992;15:1–4.
Butterfield PS, Libertin AG. Learning outcomes of an ambulatory care rotation in internal medicine for junior medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:189–92.
Lesky LG, Hershman WY. Practical approaches to a major educational challenge: training students in the ambulatory setting. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:897–904.
Woolliscroft JO, Schwenk TL. Teaching and learning in the ambulatory setting. Acad Med. 1989;64:644–8.
Vail R, Mahon-Salazar C, Morrison A, Kalet A. Patients as teachers: an integrated approach to teaching medical students about the ambulatory care of HIV infected patients. Patient Educ Couns. 1996;27:95–101.
Knowles M. The Modern Practice of Adult Education: From Pedagogy to Androgogy. Chicago, Ill: Follett; 1980:243–7.
Schwartz MD, Linzer M, Babbott B, Divine GW, Broadhead E, and the Society of General Internal Medicine Interest Group on Career Choice. Medical student interest in internal medicine. Initial report of the Society of General Internal Medicine interest group survey on factors influencing career choice in internal medicine. Ann Intern Med. 1991;114:6–15.
Schwartz MD, Linzer M, Babbott D, Divine GW, Broadhead E. The impact of an ambulatory rotation on medical student interest in internal medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 1995;10:542–9.
Irby D. Teaching and learning in ambulatory care settings: a thematic review of the literature. Acad Med. 1995;70:898–931.
Lesky LG, Borkan SC. Strategies to improve teaching in the ambulatory setting. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2133–7.
Hewson MG. Clinical teaching in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1992;7:76–82.
Goroll AH, Morrison G. Core Medicine Clerkship Curriculum Guide: A Cooperative Project of the Society of General Internal Medicine and the Clerkship Directors in Internal Medicine. A Manual for Faculty. Bethesda, MD: Division of Medicine, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration; March 1995. Contract 240-93-0029.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received from the Department of Medicine, Gouverneur Diagnostic and Treatment Center, New York, NY.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kalet, A., Schwartz, M.D., Capponi, L.J. et al. Ambulatory versus inpatient rotations in teaching third-year students internal medicine. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 327–330 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00099.x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00099.x