Skip to main content
Log in

Free gift

Redundancy or conundrum?

  • Editorials
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. American College of Physicians. Physicians and the pharmaceutical industry. Ann of Intern Med. 1990;112:624–6.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gibbons RV, Landry FJ, Blouch DL, et al. A comparison of physicians’ and patients’ attitudes toward pharmaceutical industry gifts. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13(3):151–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Palmisano P, Edelstein J. Teaching drug promotion abuses to health profession students. J Med Educ. 1980;55:453–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chren M, Landefeld S. Physicians’ behavior and their interactions with drug companies: a controlled study of physicians who requested additions to a hospital drug formulary. JAMA. 1994; 271:684–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho MK, Bero LA. The quality of drug studies published in symposium proceedings. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:485–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Stelfox HT, Chua G, O’Rourke K, Detsky AS. Conflict of interest in the debate over calcium-channel antagonists. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:101–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brotzman GL, Mark DH, Policies regulating the activities of pharmaceutical representatives in residency programs. J Fam Pract. 1992;34(1):54–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Randall T. Ethics of receiving gifts considered. JAMA. 1991;265(4):442–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Avorn J, Chen M, Hartley R. Scientific versus commercial sources of influence on the prescribing behavior of physicians. Am J Med. 1982;73:4–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs. Code of Medical Ethics: Current Opinions with Annotations. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1997: Section 8.061.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. Standards for Commercial Support of Continuing Medical Education, March 20, 1992.

  12. Sandberg WS, Carlos R, Sandberg EH, Roizen MF. The effect of educational gifts from pharmaceutical firms on medical students’ recall of company names or products. Acad Med. 1997;72:916–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mainous AG, Hueston WJ, Rich EC. Patient perceptions of physician acceptance of gifts from the pharmaceutical industry. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:335–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Blake RL, Early EK. Patients’ attitudes about gifts to physicians from pharmaceutical companies. J Am Bd Fam Pract. 1995;8:457–64.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brotzman GL, Mark DH. The effect on resident attitudes of regulatory policies regarding pharmaceutical representative attitudes. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:130–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hopper JA, Speece MW, Musial JL. Effects of an educational intervention on residents’ knowledge and attitudes toward interactions with pharmaceutical representatives. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:639–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Gonzales R, Steiner J, Sande M. Antibiotic prescribing for adults with colds, upper respiratory tract infections, and bronchitis by ambulatory care physicians. JAMA. 1997;278(11):901–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Soumerai S, McLaughlin TJ, Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E, Thibault G, Goldman L. Adverse outcomes of underuse of β-blockers in elderly survivorsof acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1997;277(2):115–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bates D, Cullen D, Laird N, et al. Incidence of adverse drug events and potential adverse drug events: implications for prevention. JAMA. 1995;274(1):29–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Beary JF. Pharmaceutical marketing has real and proven value. Characteristics of materials distributed by drug companies: four points of view. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:635–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Food and Drug Administration, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Promoting Medical Products in a Changing Healthcare Environment; I. Medical Product Promotion by Health care Organizations or Pharmacy Benefits Management Companies. Draft Guidance, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; December 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luce BR, Lyles CA, Rentz AM. The View from Managed Care Pharmacy. Health Affairs. 1996;15:168–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the official positions of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

So, A.D. Free gift. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 213–215 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00058.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00058.x

Navigation