Skip to main content
Log in

Ant defence system: A mechanism organizing individual responses into efficient collective behavior

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Ecological Research

A colony of social insects is an excellent model for investigating the organization of responses of subunits (i.e. colony members) with limited skills into sophisticated collective behavior. The defence system of Lasius niger ant colonies is well organized in a context-dependent way. The proportion of fighting ants to fleeing ants changes gradually according to the importance of the area being defended, and was higher where ants tended honeydew-rich aphids and on trails for foraging with heavy traffic, than where ants were walking alone or on trails with light traffic. Although there were intrinsic differences in aggressiveness between individual ants, the differences in aggressive responses between defended areas was not due to the presence of highly aggressive or timid individuals in each area. Instead, it was due to a change in aggressiveness of individuals in response to external conditions. The cue that altered individual aggressiveness was the presence of surrounding nest-mates, rather than the presence of aphids. We concluded that the defence system of this ant species consists of three processes: (i) a recruiting system that allocates more workers to more valuable resources; (ii) individual ants following a simple decision rule to become more aggressive in response to increased numbers of nest-mates nearby (hence aggressive behavior reflecting the importance of each area to the colony); and (iii) variability in individual responses causing a gradual change in the proportion of fighting ants responding to a threat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Beckers R., Deneubourg J. L., Goss S. (1992) Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the ant Lasius niger (L.). Insectes Sociaux 39: 59–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers R., Deneubourg J. L., Goss S. (1993) Modulation of trail laying in the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and its role in the collective selection of a food source. Journal of Insect Behavior 6: 751–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckers R., Deneubourg J. L., Goss S., Pasteels J. M. (1990) Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insectes Sociaux 37: 258–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beshers S. N., Robinson G. E., Mittenthal J. E. (1999) Response thresholds and division of labor in insect colonies. In: Information Processing in Social Insects (eds C. Detrain, J. L. Deneubourg & J. M. Pasteels) pp. 115–139. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonabeau E. & Theraulaz G. (1999) Role and variability of response thresholds in the reguration of devision of labor in insect societies. In: Information Processing in Social Insects (eds C. Detrain, J. L. Deneubourg & J. M. Pasteels) pp. 141–163. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonseries B., Wright P. J., Bament S., Chukwu U. O. (1998) Optimal patch use by foraging workers of Lasius fuliginosus, L. niger and Myrmica ruginodis. Ecological Entmology 23: 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown M. J. F. & Gordon D. M. (1997) Individual specialisation and encounters between harvester ant colonies. Behaviour 134: 849–866.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies N. B. & Houston A. I. (1984) Territory economics. In: Behavioural Ecology: an Evolutionary Approach, 2nd edn (eds J. R. Krebs & N. B. Davies) pp. 148–169. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C., Deneubourg J. L., Pasteels J. M. (1999) Information Processing in Social Insects. Birkhauser Verlag, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detrain C. & Pasteels J. M. (1992) Caste polyethism and collective defense in the ant, Pheidole pallidula: The outcome of quantitative differences in recruitment. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 29: 405–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks N. R. & Partridge L. W. (1993) Lanchester battles and the evolution of combat in ants. Animal Behaviour 45: 197–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D. M. (1987) Group-level dynamics in harvester ants: young colonies and role of patrolling. Animal Behaviour 35: 833–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D. M. (1989) Dynamics of task switching in harvester ants. Animal Behaviour 38: 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon D. M. (1996) The organization of work in social insect colonies. Nature 380: 121–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa E. (1993) Nest defense and early production of the major workers in the dimorphic ant Colobopsis nipponicus (Wheeler) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 33: 73–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. & Wilson E. O. (1977) Colony-specific territorial pheromon in the African weaver ant Oecophylla longinoda (Latreille). Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 74: 2072–2075.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B. & Wilson E. O. (1990) The Ants. Belknap Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayade S., Cammaerts M. C., Suzzoni J. P. (1993) Home-range marking and territorial marking in Cataglyphis cursor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Behavioural Processes 30: 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oster G. F. & Wilson E. O. (1978) Cast and Ecology in the Social Insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson G. E. (1992) Reguration of division of labor in social insect colonies. Annual Review of Entomology 37: 637–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakata H. (1995) Density-dependent predation of the ant Lasius niger (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on two attended aphids Lachnus tropicalis and Myzocallis kuricola (Homoptera: Aphididae). Researches on Population Ecology 37: 159–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzemann A. & Jaffe K. (1990) On the territorial behavior of field colonies of the leaf-cutting ant Atta laevigata (Hymenoptera: Myrmicinae). Journal of Insect Physiology 36: 133–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salzemann A., Nagnan P., Tellier F., Jaffe K. (1992) Leaf-cutting ant Atta laevigata (Formicidae: Attini) marks its territory with colony-specific Dufour gland secretion. Journal of Chemical Ecology 18: 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • sas institute inc. (1996) SAS/STAT Software Changes and Enhancements. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley T. D. (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 11: 287–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeley T. D. (1996) The Wisdom of the Hive: the Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies. Belknap Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tschinkel W. R., Adams E. S., Macom T. (1995) Territory area and colony size in the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. Journal of Animal Ecology 64: 473–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E. O. (1976a) Behavioral diacretization and the number of castes in an ant species. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 1: 141– 154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E. O. (1976b) A social ethogram of the neotropical arboreal ant Zacryptocerus varianus (Fr. Smith). Animal Behavior 34: 354–363.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Sakata.

About this article

Cite this article

Sakata, H., Katayama, N. Ant defence system: A mechanism organizing individual responses into efficient collective behavior. Ecol Res 16, 395–403 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00404.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2001.00404.x

Key words

Navigation