We carried out field experiments to investigate the coexistence of Drosophila species in domestic and forest areas on the basis of the aggregation model. Three cosmopolitan species Drosophila simulans Sturtevant, Drosophila melanogaster Meigen and Drosophila immigrans Sturtevant, and a native species, Drosophila auraria Peng, emerged abundantly from banana placed at the domestic station, while Drosophila immigrans and five native species, Drosophila lutescens Okada, Drosophila rufa Kikkawa and Peng, Drosophila bizonata Kikkawa and Peng, Drosophila sternopleuralis Okada and Kurokawa and Scaptodrosophila coracina (Kikkawa and Peng), were abundant at the forest station. The present analysis suggests that their coexistence was facilitated by the aggregation mechanism. In the cosmopolitan species, the density of individuals that emerged from patches increased with the increase of patch size, but the relationship between fly density and patch size was not clear in the native species. This difference in distribution patterns between the cosmopolitan and native species is likely to be due to the difference in the female visiting behavior. In the present analysis, however, it was not clear whether patch size diversity facilitated their coexistence or not. The effect of patch size diversity may have been masked, because the effect of aggregation was more prominent. The rate of parasitism by wasps was high in October at the domestic station, and in May and June at the forest station. The present result suggests that the rate of parasitism was density-dependent, at least at the domestic station, and therefore parasitism facilitates the coexistence of drosophilid species in domestic areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Atkinson W. D. (1985) Coexistence of Australian rainforest Diptera breeding in fallen fruit. Journal of Animal Ecology 54: 507–518.
Atkinson W. D. & Shorrocks B. (1981) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: A simulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology 50: 461–471.
Atkinson W. D. & Shorrocks B. (1984) Aggregation of larval Diptera over discrete and ephemeral breeding site: The implications for coexistence. American Naturalist 124: 336–351.
Braack L. E. O. (1987) Community dynamics of carrion-attending arthropods in tropical African woodland. Oecologia 72: 402–409.
Carton Y., Boulétreau M., van Alphen J. J. M., van Lenteren J. C. (1986) The Drosophila parasitic wasps. In: The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3e (eds M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson & J. N. Thompson Jr) pp. 347–394. Academic Press, London.
Comins H. N. & Hassell M. P. (1987) The dynamics of predation and competition in patchy environments. Theoretical Population Biology 31: 393–421.
Denno R. F. & Cothran W. R. (1975) Niche relationships of a guild of necrophagous flies. Annals of Entomological Society of America 68: 741–751.
Denno R. F. & Cothran W. R. (1976) Competitive interactions and ecological strategies of sarcophagid and calliphorid flies inhabiting rabbit carrion. Annals of Entomological Society of America 69: 109–113.
Dobzhansky T. (1965) ‘Wild’ and ‘domestic’ species of Drosophila. In: The Genetics of Colonizing Species (eds H. G. Baker & G. L. Stebbins) pp. 533–546. Academic Press, New York.
Green R. F. (1986) Does aggregation prevent competitive exclusion? A response to Atkinson and Shorrocks. American Naturalist 128: 301–304.
Hanski I. (1981) Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment with and without predation. Oikos 37: 306–312.
Hanski I. (1987) Carrion fly community dynamics: Patchiness, seasonality and coexistence. Ecological Entomology 12: 257–266.
Ives A. R. (1991) Aggregation and coexistence in a carrion fly community. Ecological Monograph 61: 75–94.
Jaenike J. & James A. C. (1991) Aggregation and the coexistence of mycophagous Drosophila. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 913–928.
Rosewell J., Shorrocks B., Edwards K. (1990) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: Testing the assumption. I. Aggregation. Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 977–1001.
Sevenster J. G. (1996) Aggregation and coexistence. I. Theory and analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 9297–9307.
Sevenster J. G. & van Alphen J. J. M. (1996) Aggregation and coexistence. II. A neotropical Drosophila community. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 308–324.
Shorrocks B., Rosewell J., Edwards K. (1990) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: Testing the assumption. II. Association. Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 1003–1017.
Throckmorton L. H. (1975) The phylogeny, ecology and geography of Drosophila. In: Handbook of Genetics, Vol. 3 (ed. R. C. King) pp. 421–469. Plenum Press, New York.
Toda M. J., Kimura M. T., Tsuno N. (1999) Coexistence mechanisms of mycophagous drosophilids on multi-species fungal hosts: Aggregation and resource partitioning. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 794–803.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Mitsui, H., Kimura, M. Coexistence of drosophilid flies: Aggregation, patch size diversity and parasitism. Ecol Res 15, 93–100 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00328.x
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00328.x