Skip to main content
Log in

Coexistence of drosophilid flies: Aggregation, patch size diversity and parasitism

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Ecological Research

We carried out field experiments to investigate the coexistence of Drosophila species in domestic and forest areas on the basis of the aggregation model. Three cosmopolitan species Drosophila simulans Sturtevant, Drosophila melanogaster Meigen and Drosophila immigrans Sturtevant, and a native species, Drosophila auraria Peng, emerged abundantly from banana placed at the domestic station, while Drosophila immigrans and five native species, Drosophila lutescens Okada, Drosophila rufa Kikkawa and Peng, Drosophila bizonata Kikkawa and Peng, Drosophila sternopleuralis Okada and Kurokawa and Scaptodrosophila coracina (Kikkawa and Peng), were abundant at the forest station. The present analysis suggests that their coexistence was facilitated by the aggregation mechanism. In the cosmopolitan species, the density of individuals that emerged from patches increased with the increase of patch size, but the relationship between fly density and patch size was not clear in the native species. This difference in distribution patterns between the cosmopolitan and native species is likely to be due to the difference in the female visiting behavior. In the present analysis, however, it was not clear whether patch size diversity facilitated their coexistence or not. The effect of patch size diversity may have been masked, because the effect of aggregation was more prominent. The rate of parasitism by wasps was high in October at the domestic station, and in May and June at the forest station. The present result suggests that the rate of parasitism was density-dependent, at least at the domestic station, and therefore parasitism facilitates the coexistence of drosophilid species in domestic areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Atkinson W. D. (1985) Coexistence of Australian rainforest Diptera breeding in fallen fruit. Journal of Animal Ecology 54: 507–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson W. D. & Shorrocks B. (1981) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: A simulation model. Journal of Animal Ecology 50: 461–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson W. D. & Shorrocks B. (1984) Aggregation of larval Diptera over discrete and ephemeral breeding site: The implications for coexistence. American Naturalist 124: 336–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braack L. E. O. (1987) Community dynamics of carrion-attending arthropods in tropical African woodland. Oecologia 72: 402–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carton Y., Boulétreau M., van Alphen J. J. M., van Lenteren J. C. (1986) The Drosophila parasitic wasps. In: The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila, Vol. 3e (eds M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson & J. N. Thompson Jr) pp. 347–394. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comins H. N. & Hassell M. P. (1987) The dynamics of predation and competition in patchy environments. Theoretical Population Biology 31: 393–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno R. F. & Cothran W. R. (1975) Niche relationships of a guild of necrophagous flies. Annals of Entomological Society of America 68: 741–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denno R. F. & Cothran W. R. (1976) Competitive interactions and ecological strategies of sarcophagid and calliphorid flies inhabiting rabbit carrion. Annals of Entomological Society of America 69: 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky T. (1965) ‘Wild’ and ‘domestic’ species of Drosophila. In: The Genetics of Colonizing Species (eds H. G. Baker & G. L. Stebbins) pp. 533–546. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R. F. (1986) Does aggregation prevent competitive exclusion? A response to Atkinson and Shorrocks. American Naturalist 128: 301–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I. (1981) Coexistence of competitors in patchy environment with and without predation. Oikos 37: 306–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I. (1987) Carrion fly community dynamics: Patchiness, seasonality and coexistence. Ecological Entomology 12: 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives A. R. (1991) Aggregation and coexistence in a carrion fly community. Ecological Monograph 61: 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J. & James A. C. (1991) Aggregation and the coexistence of mycophagous Drosophila. Journal of Animal Ecology 60: 913–928.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosewell J., Shorrocks B., Edwards K. (1990) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: Testing the assumption. I. Aggregation. Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 977–1001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevenster J. G. (1996) Aggregation and coexistence. I. Theory and analysis. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 9297–9307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevenster J. G. & van Alphen J. J. M. (1996) Aggregation and coexistence. II. A neotropical Drosophila community. Journal of Animal Ecology 65: 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorrocks B., Rosewell J., Edwards K. (1990) Competition on a divided and ephemeral resource: Testing the assumption. II. Association. Journal of Animal Ecology 59: 1003–1017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throckmorton L. H. (1975) The phylogeny, ecology and geography of Drosophila. In: Handbook of Genetics, Vol. 3 (ed. R. C. King) pp. 421–469. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toda M. J., Kimura M. T., Tsuno N. (1999) Coexistence mechanisms of mycophagous drosophilids on multi-species fungal hosts: Aggregation and resource partitioning. Journal of Animal Ecology 68: 794–803.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masahito T. Kimura.

About this article

Cite this article

Mitsui, H., Kimura, M. Coexistence of drosophilid flies: Aggregation, patch size diversity and parasitism. Ecol Res 15, 93–100 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00328.x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1703.2000.00328.x

Key words

Navigation