Patients seek empathy from their physicians. Medical educators increasingly recognize this need. Yet in seeking to make empathy a reliable professional skill, doctors change the meaning of the term. Outside the field of medicine, empathy is a mode of understanding that specifically involves emotional resonance. In contrast, leading physician educators define empathy as a form of detached cognition. In contrast, this article argues that physicians’ emotional attunement greatly serves the cognitive goal of understanding patients’ emotions. This has important implications for teaching empathy.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Learning objectives for medical student education-guidelines for medical schools: Report I of the Medical School Objectives Project. Acad Med. 1999:74:13–8.Google Scholar
- 3.Markakis K, Frankel R, Beckman H, Suchman A. Teaching empathy: it can be done. Working paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, San Francisco, Calif, April 29–May 1, 1999.Google Scholar
- 5.Aring C. Sympathy and empathy. JAMA. 1958;167:448–52.Google Scholar
- 6.Osler W. Aequanimitas. New York, NY: Norton; 1963:29.Google Scholar
- 7.Fox R, Lief H. Training for “detached concern.” In: Lief H, ed. The Psychological Basis of Medical Practice. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1963.Google Scholar
- 9.Damasio A. Descartes’ Error. London, UK: Macmillan; 1994.Google Scholar
- 10.De Sousa R. The Rationality of Emotions. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1987.Google Scholar
- 17.Coles R. The Call of Stories. Boston, Mass: Houghton Mifflin; 1989:117–8.Google Scholar
- 18.Brody H. The Healer’s Power. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
- 23.Stein H. The Psychodynamics of Medical Practice. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1985.Google Scholar
- 24.Winnicott D. Hate in the counter-transference. Int J Psychoanal. 1949;30:69–74.Google Scholar