Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp 468–474 | Cite as

Integrating teaching skills and clinical content in a faculty development workshop

  • Michael L. Green
  • Cary P. Gross
  • Walter N. Kernan
  • Jeffrey G. Wong
  • Eric S. Holmboe
Innovations In Education And Clinical Practice

Abstract

Incorporating clinical content into medical education faculty development programs has been proposed as a strategy to consolidate faculty continuing medical education time and enhance learning. We developed a faculty development program for ambulatory internal medicine preceptors that integrated primary care genetics with ambulatory precepting. The instructional strategies addressed both areas simultaneously and included facilitated discussions, mini-lectures, trigger tapes, and role plays. To evaluate the program, we conducted a pre-post trial. Skills were measured by retrospective pre-post self-reported ratings and behaviors by self-reported implementation of commitment to change (CTC) statements. Participants’ (N=26) ambulatory precepting and primary care genetics skill ratings improved after the intervention. They listed an average of 2.4 clinical teaching CTC statements and 2.0 clinical practice CTC statements. By 3 months after the workshop, preceptors, as a group, fully implemented 32 (38%), partially implemented 35 (41%), and failed to implement 18 (21%) CTC statements. The most common barrier to clinical teaching change was insufficient skills (8 of 25; 32%) and to clinical practice change was lack of a suitable patient (15 of 25; 60%). Integrating clinical content with clinical teaching in a faculty development workshop is feasible, can improve clinical and teaching skills, and can facilitate behavior change.

Key words

faculty development curriculum evaluation integration 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Levinsky NG. A survey of changes in the proportions of ambulatory training in internal medicine clerkships and residencies from 1986–87 to 1996–97. Acad Med. 1998;73:1114–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barzansky B, Jonas HS, Etzel SI. Educational programs in US medical schools, 1998–1999. JAMA. 1999;282:840–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Council on Graduate Medical Education TR. Physician Education for a Changing Health Care Environment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1999.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Woolliscroft JO, Schwenk TL. Teaching and learning in the ambulatory setting. Acad Med. 1989;64:644–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butterfield PS, Libertin AG. Learning outcomes of an ambulatory care rotation in internal medicine for junior medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:189–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skeff KM. Enhancing teaching effectiveness and vitality in the ambulatory setting. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:26S-33S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Green ML, Ciampi MA, Ellis PJ. Residents’ medical information needs in clinic: are they being met? Am J Med. 2000;109:218–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Peters AS, Clark-Chiarelli N, Block SD. Perspectives on teaching among community-based family physicians. Teach Learn Med. 1999;11:244–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kollisch DO, Frasier PY, Slatt L, Storaasli M. Community preceptors’ views of a required third-year family medicine clerkship. Arch Fam Med. 1997;6:25–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vinson DC, Paden C. The effect of teaching medical students on private practitioners’ workloads. Acad Med. 1994;69:237–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kumar A, Loomba D, Rahangdale RY, Kallen DJ. Rewards and incentives for nonsalaried clinical faculty who teach medical students. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:370–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nieman LZ. Combining educational process and medical content during preceptor faculty development. Fam Med. 1999;31:310–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Swagerty D Jr, Walling A, Studenski S. Preliminary report from the Kansas Hartford Geriatrics Project: a model of community university collaboration in geriatric medicine faculty development. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48:1513–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N. A five-step “microskills” model of clinical teaching [see comments]. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1992;5:419–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McGee SR, Irby DM. Teaching in the outpatient clinic. Practical tips. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12(suppl 2):34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lesky LG, Borkan SC. Strategies to improve teaching in the ambulatory medicine setting [see comments]. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:2133–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Clark BA. Cancer genetics for the clinician: recommendations on screening for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Cleve Clin J Med. 2000;67:408–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smedira HJ. Practical issues in counseling healthy women about their breast cancer risk and use of tamoxifen citrate. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:3034–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skeff KM, Stratos GA, Bergen MR. Evaluation of a medical faculty development program: a comparison of traditional pre/post and retrospective pre/post self-assessment ratings. Eval Health Prof. 1992;3:350–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hewson MG, Copeland HL, Fishleder AJ. What’s the use of faculty development? Program evaluation using retrospective self-assessments and independent performance ratings. Teach Learn Med. 2001;13:153–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mazmanian PE, Mazmanian PM. Commitment to change: theoretical foundations, methods, and outcomes. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1999;19:200–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones DL. Viability of the commitment-for-change evaluation strategy in continuing medical education. Acad Med. 1990;65:S37–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Knowles MS, Holton EF, Swanson RA. The Adult Learner. Woburn, Mass: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Godden DR, Braddeley AD. Context-dependent memory in two natural environments: on land and underwater. Br J Psychol. 1975;66:325–31.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME. A review of 50 randomized controlled trials [see comments]. JAMA. 1992;268:1111–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mazmanian PE, Johnson RE, Zhang A, Boothby J, Yeatts EJ. Effects of a signature on rates of change: a randomized controlled trial involving continuing education and the commitment-to-change model. Acad Med. 2001;76:642–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mazmanian PE, Daffron SR, Johnson RE, Davis DA, Kantrowitz MP. Information about barriers to planned change: a randomized controlled trial involving continuing medical education lectures and commitment to change. Acad Med. 1998;73:882–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pereles L, Gondocz T, Lockyer JM, Parboosingh J, Hogan D. Effectiveness of commitment contracts in facilitating change in continuing medical education intervention. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 1997;17:27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mandel LP, Stenchever MA, Vontver LA. A model clinical faculty workshop program for a multisite clerkship. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:1011–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Howard GS, Dailey PR. Response-shift bias: a source of contamination of self-report measures. J Appl Psychol. 1979;64:144–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Howard GS, Ralph KM, Gulanick NA, Maxwell SE, Nance SW, Gerber SK. Internal invalidity in pretest-posttest self-report evaluations and a re-evaluation of retrospective pretests. App Psycholog Meas. 1979;3:1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bray JH, Howard GS. Methodological considerations in the evaluation of a teacher-training program. J Educ Psychol. 1980; 72:62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hoogstraten J. Influence of objective measures on self-reports in a retrospective pretest-posttest design. J Exper Educ. 1985;53:207–10.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sprangers M, Hoogstraten J. On delay and reassessment of retrospective preratings. J Exper Educ. 1988;56:148–53.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reid A, Stritter FT, Arndt JE. Assessment of faculty development program outcomes. Fam Med. 1997;29:242–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dolcourt JL. Commitment to change: a strategy for promoting educational effectiveness. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2000;20:156–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lockyer JM, Fidler H, Ward R, Basson RJ, Elliott S, Toews J. Commitment to change statements: a way of understanding how participants use information and skills taught in an educational session. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2001;21:82–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Purkis IE. Commitment for changes: an instrument for evaluating CME courses. J Med Educ. 1982;57:61–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Curry L, Purkis IE. Validity of self-reports of behavior changes by participants after a CME course. J Med Educ. 1986;61:579–84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Green ML. Identifying, appraising, and implementing medical education curricula: a guide for medical educators. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:889–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Whitehead AN. The Aims of Education. New York: The Free Press; 1929.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Green
    • 1
    • 2
  • Cary P. Gross
    • 1
  • Walter N. Kernan
    • 1
  • Jeffrey G. Wong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Eric S. Holmboe
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Received from the Department of Internal MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew Haven
  2. 2.Waterbury and St. Mary’s HospitalsWaterbury

Personalised recommendations