Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 595–600 | Cite as

Detection of errors by attending physicians on a general medicine service

  • Sarwat I. ChaudhryEmail author
  • Kolawole A. Olofinboba
  • Harlan M. Krumholz
Original Articles


BACKGROUND: Attending physicians are well positioned to identify medical errors and understand their consequences. The spectrum of errors that can be detected by attending physicians in the course of their usual practice is currently unknown.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency, types, and consequences of errors that can be detected by attending hospitalist physicians in the care of their patients, and to compare the types of errors first discovered by attending hospitalists to those discovered by other providers.

DESIGN: Prospective identification of errors by attending physicians.

SETTING: Two hundred-bed, academic hospital.

PATIENTS: Five hundred twenty-eight patients admitted to the general medicine service from October 2000 to April 2001.

MEASUREMENTS: Errors, both near misses and adverse events, were identified during the course of routine, clinical care by 2 attending hospitalists. Errors first detected by other health care workers were also recorded.

MAIN RESULTS: Of the 528 patients admitted to the hospitalist service, 10.4% experienced at least 1 error: 6.2% a near miss and 4.2% an adverse event. Although differences did not achieve statistical significance, most of the errors first detected by house staff, nurses, and laboratory technicians were adverse events; most of the errors first detected by the attending hospitalists, pharmacists, and consultants were near misses. Drug errors were the most common type of error overall.

CONCLUSIONS: Attending physicians engaged in routine clinical care can detect a range of errors, and differences may exist in the types of errors detected by various health care providers.

Key Words

adverse event medical error near miss voluntary reporting 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. Institute of Medicine (U.S.) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brennan TA, Leape LL, Laird NM, et al. Incidence of adverse events and negligence in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study I. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:370–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leape LL, Brennan TA, Laird N, et al. The nature of adverse events in hospitalized patients. Results of the Harvard Medical Practice Study II. N Engl J Med. 1991;324:377–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado. Med Care. 2000;38:261–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weingart SN, Callanan LD, Ship AN, Aronson MD. A physician-based voluntary reporting system for adverse events and medical errors. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:809–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weingart SN, Ship AN, Aronson MD. Confidential clinician-reported surveillance of adverse events among medical inpatients. J Gen Intern Med.2000;15:470–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Neil AC, Petersen LA, Cook EF, Bate DW, Lee TH, Brennan TA. Physician reporting compared with medical-record review to identify adverse medical events. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:370–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Joint commission commends proposed legislation for patient safety. Available at: http:\\\about+us\news+letters\jcahonline\print\jo_07_02.htm. Accessed June 24, 2003.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Thomas EJ, Lipsitz SR, Studdert DM, Brennan TA. The reliability of medical record review for estimating adverse event rates. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136:812–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarwat I. Chaudhry
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kolawole A. Olofinboba
    • 5
  • Harlan M. Krumholz
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Received from the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars ProgramYale UniversityNew Haven
  2. 2.Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of MedicineYale University School of MedicineNew Haven
  3. 3.Section of Health Policy and Administration, Department of Epidemiology and Public HealthYale University School of MedicineNew Haven
  4. 4.Yale-New Haven Hospital Center for Outcomes Research and EvaluationYale University School of MedicineNew Haven
  5. 5.Massachusetts Institute of Technology Sloan School of ManagementCambridge

Personalised recommendations