Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 128–137

Is the distal hyperplastic polyp a marker for proximal neoplasia?

A systematic review
  • Sachin Dave
  • Siu Hui
  • Kurt Kroenke
  • Thomas F. Imperiale
Review

Abstract

CONTEXT: The current literature is unclear about the association between distal hyperplastic polyps and synchronous neoplasia (adenomatous polyps and cancer) in the proximal colon.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of proximal neoplasia associated with distal hyperplastic polyps.

DATA SOURCES: Database searches (medline and embase from 1966 to 2001) and manual search of the bibliographies of included and excluded studies, case reports, editorials, review articles, and textbooks of Gastroenterology.

STUDY SELECTION: Studies describing the prevalence of proximal neoplasia in persons with distal hyperplastic polyps.

DATA EXTRACTION: Demographics, clinical variables, study design, and prevalence of proximal neoplasia associated with various distal colorectal findings.

DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 18 included studies, 12 involved asymptomatic individuals in which the pooled absolute risk of any proximal neoplasia associated with distal hyperplastic polyps was 25% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 21% to 29%). In 4 studies where colonoscopy was performed irrespective of distal findings, the absolute risk was 21% (95% CI, 14% to 28%). The relative risk of finding any proximal neoplasia in persons with distal hyperplastic polyps was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.8) compared to those with no distal polyps. Among 6 studies of patients with symptoms or risk factors for neoplasia, the absolute risk of proximal neoplasia was 35% (95% CI, 32% to 39%) in persons with distal hyperplastic polyps. In 2 studies of screening colonoscopy, advanced proximal neoplasia (cancer, or a polyp with villous histology or severe dysplasia, or a tubular adenoma ≥1 cm) was present in 4% to 5% of persons with distal hyperplastic polyps, which was 1.5 to 2.6 times greater than in those with no distal polyps.

CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic persons, a distal hyperplastic polyp is associated with a 21% to 25% risk for any proximal neoplasia and a 4% to 5% risk of advanced proximal neoplasia, and may justify examination of the proximal colon. Further study is needed to determine the risk of advanced proximal neoplasia associated with size and number of distal hyperplastic polyps.

Key words

colorectal cancer cancer screening sigmoidoscopy colorectal neoplasms systematic review 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Macrae F, Young G. Neoplastic and nonneoplastic polyps of the colon and rectum. In: Yamada. ed. Textbook of Gastroenterology. Vol. 2. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1999:1965.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shinya H, Wolff WI. Morphology, anatomic distribution, and cancer potential of colonic polyps: an analysis of 7000 polyps endoscopically removed. Ann Surg. 1979;190:679–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Granqvist S. Distribution of large polyps in the large bowel in relation to age: a colonoscopic study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1981;16:1025–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lieberman DA, Smith FW. Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:946–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DiSario JA, Foutch PG, Mai HD, Pardy K, Manne RK. Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:941–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson DA, Gurney MS, Volpe RJ, et al. A prospective study of the prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk. Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85:969–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rex D, Lehman G, Hawes R, Ulbright T, Smith J. Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons with negative fecal occult blood tests. Gasterenterology. 1991;100:64–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Levin TR, Palitz A, Grossman S, et al. Predicting advanced proximal colonic neoplasia with screening sigmoidoscopy. JAMA. 1999;281:1611–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Read TE, Read JD, Butterly LF. Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy. [see comments]. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:8–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schoen RE, Corle D, Cranston L, et al. Is colonoscopy needed for the nonadvanced adenoma found on sigmoidoscopy? The Polyp Prevention Trial [see comments]. Gastroenterology. 1998;115:533–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wallace MB, Kemp JA, Trnka YM, Donovan JM, Farraye FA. Is colonoscopy indicated for small adenomas found by screening flexible sigmoidoscopy? Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:273–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zarchy T, Ershoff D. Do characteristics of adenomas on flexible sigmoidoscopy predict advanced lesions on baseline colonoscopy? Gastroenterology. 1994;106:1702–5.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY, Larkin GN, Rogge JD, Ransohoff DF. Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:169–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G. Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:162–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Achkar E, Winawer SJ. Controversies, dilemmas, and dialogues. A hyperplastic polyp is discovered on flexible sigmoidoscopy. Is a full colonoscopy indicated? Am J Gastroenterol. 1990;85:367–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fraser GM, Niv Y. Hyperplastic polyp and colonic neoplasia. Is there an association? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1993;16:278–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Waye JD. Hyperplastic colon polyps-are they markers? Ann Intern Med. 1988;109:851–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bond JH. Polyp guidelines: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with nonfamilial colorectal polyps. The Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Ann Intern Med. 1993;119:836–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bond JH. Polyp guideline: diagnosis, treatment, and surveillance for patients with colorectal polyps. Practice Parameters Committee of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:3053–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    ASGE. Colorectal cancer screen and surveillance. The role of colonoscopy in the management of patients with colonic polyps nepolasia. Guidelines for Clinical Application. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:921–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:594–642.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Byers T, Levin B, Rothenberger D, Dodd GD, Smith RA. American Cancer Society guidelines for screening and surveillance for early detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: update 1997. American Cancer Society Detection and Treatment Advisory Group on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 1997;47:154–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Anonymous. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health and Human Services; 1995:89–103.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Butterly L, Fiarman GS, Bockler M. Large hyperplastic polyps predict colonic adenomas. Am J Gastroenterology. 1998;93:1685.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Postelnik A, Woodger A, Kapparis A, Frommer D. Hyperplastic polyps of the colon indicate increased liability for colon neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:A357.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Winawer SJ, Diaz B, Zauber A, Gottlieb LS, O’Brien M, Sternberg SS, and the NPS Workgroup. The National Polyp Study: colorectal adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Gasterenterology 1988;94:A499.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Baba ER, Fujii T, Nakamura K. et al. Is hyperplastic rectal polyp (HRP) useful as marker for colorectal cancer in low risk patients? Gastroenterology. 1998;114:A561.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Matter SE, Campbell DR. Significance of distal polyps detected with flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients. Arch Intern Med. 1992;152:1776–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tsai CJ, Lu DK. Small colorectal polyps: histopathology and clinical significance. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:988–94.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Church JM, Fazio VW, Jones IT. Small colorectal polyps. Are they worth treating? Dis Colon Rectum. 1988;31:50–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    The Multicentric Study of Colorectal Adenomas (SMAC) Workgroup. A multicenter study of colorectal adenomas: rationale, objectives, methods and characteristics of the study cohort. Tumori. 1995;81:157–63.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rauf A, Levendoglu H. Diminutive polyps detected by flexible sigmoidoscopy neccesitates full investigation. Gastrointest Endosc. 1988;34:199.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zauber A, Winawer SJ, Diaz B, et al., and the NPS Workgroup. The National Polyp Study: the association of colonic hyperplastic polyps and adenomas. Am J Gastroenterol. 1988;83:1060.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ryan ME, Norfleet RG, Kirchner JP, et al. The significance of diminutive colonic polyps found at flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;35:85–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Black J, Skolnick MH, Burt RW. Lack of association between hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps of the colon. Gastroenterology. 1987;92:1319.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sciallero S, Costantini M, Bertinelli E, et al. Distal hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas: results from a multicentric study of colorectal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46:124–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kim WH, Lee SK, Chung JH, Cho YS, Yoo HM, Kang JK. Significance of rectosigmoid polyp as a predictor of proximal colonic polyp. Yonsei Med J. 2000;41:98–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pines A, Bat L, Rosenbaum J, Levo Y, Shemesh E. Are tiny polyps important when found on sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic people? J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;15:113–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Provenzale D, Martin ZZ, Holland KL, Sandler RS. Colon adenomas in patients with hyperplastic polyps. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1988;10:46–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986;7:177–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    SAS Institute. SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Vol. 1. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 1988.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Goldstein H. Multilevel Statistical Levels. London: Edward Arnold; 1995.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Foutch GP, DiSario JA, Pardy K. The sentinal hyperplastic polyp: a marker for synchronous neoplasia in the proximal colon. Am J Gastroenterol. 1991;86:1482–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brady PG, Straker RJ, McClave SA, Nord HJ, Pinkas M, Robinson BE. Are hyperplastic rectosigmoid polyps associated with an increased risk of proximal colonic neoplasms? Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:481–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rex DK, Smith JJ, Ulbright TM, Lehman GA. Distal colonic hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas in asymptomatic average-risk subjects. Gastroenterology. 1992;102:317–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Stoltenberg PH, Kirtley DW. Are diminutive colorectal polyps clinically significant? Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;34:172.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Nusko G, Altendorf-Hofmann A, Hermanek P, Ell C, Hahn EG. Correlation of polypoid lesions in the distal colorectum and proximal colon in asymptomatic screening subjects. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1996;8:351–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Deal SE, Woogen SD, Stuckey C, Zfass AM. Screening sigmoidoscopy for colonic neoplasms: hyperplastic polyps (HP) require further evaluation and 30 cm flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) is inadequate. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:262.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Blue MG, Sivak MV Jr. Achkar E, Matzen R, Stahl RR. Hyperplastic polyps seen at sigmoidoscopy are markers for additional adenomas seen at colonoscopy. [see comments] Gastroenterology. 1991;100:564–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Opelka FG, Timmcke AE, Gathright JB Jr., Ray JE, Hicks TC. Diminutive colonic polyps: an indication for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:178–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Olsen HW, Lawrence WA. Hyperplastic polyps at screening sigmoidoscopy are not an indication for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:312.Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Provenzale D, Garrett JW, Condon SE, Sandler RS. Risk for colon adenomas in patients with rectosigmoid hyperplastic polyps. Ann Intern Med. 1990;113:760–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rokkas T, Karameris A, Mikou G. Small polyps found at sigmoidoscopy: are they significant? Hepatogastroenterology. 1993;40:475–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Pennazio M, Arrigoni A, Risio M, Spandre M, Rossini FP. Small rectosigmoid polyps as markers of proximal neoplasms. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:1121–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Ansher AF, Lewis JH, Fleischer DE, et al. Hyperplastic colonic polyps as a marker for adenomatous colonic polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989;84:113–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ellis NC, Boggs WH, Slagle GW. Clinical significance of diminutive polyps of the rectum and sigmoid colon. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36:8–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Stryker S, Wolff B. Natural history of untreated colonic polyps. Gastroenterology. 1987;93:1009–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN, et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut. 1996;39:449–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ransohoff D, Sandler R. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:40–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Hawkins NJ, Ward RL. Sporadic colorectal cancers with microsatellite instability and their possible origin in hyperplastic polyps and serrated adenomas. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1307–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Khvatyuk O, Zaubert AG, Winawer SJ. Association of hyperplastic polyps and advanced adenomas: are there high-risk hyperplastic polyps? Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:S154.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Martinez M, McPherson R, Levin B, Glober G. A case-control study of dietary intake and other lifestyle risk factors for hyperplastic polyps. Gastroenterology. 1997;113:423–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Jass J, Iino H, Ruszkiewicz A, et al. Neoplastic progression occurs through mutator pathways in hyperplastic polyposis of the colorectum. Gut. 2000;47:43–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jass J. Hyperplastic polyps of the colorectum—innocent or guilty? Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:163–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Borzak S, Ridker P. Discordance between meta-analyses and large-scale randomized controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:873–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sachin Dave
    • 1
  • Siu Hui
    • 1
  • Kurt Kroenke
    • 1
  • Thomas F. Imperiale
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.the Department of Medicine and The Regenstrief Institute, Inc.Indiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis
  2. 2.the Roudebush VA Medical CenterIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolis

Personalised recommendations