Helping journalists get it right
- 61 Downloads
- 13 Citations
Abstract
News reports are the way that most people, including many physicians and scientists, first learn about new developments in medicine. Because these reports can raise awareness, influence behavior, and confer credibility, physicians should share responsibility with the media for accurate reporting. Physicians can work with reporters to avoid sensationalizing tentative findings, overstating benefits, and making inappropriate generalizations. This article includes pragmatic suggestions for crafting effective news releases and explaining numerical data. It details “rules of the road” for interviews. Working collaboratively with news reporters to improve the quality of medical stories in the lay press benefits patients and physicians alike.
Key words
journalism, medical mass media physicians communication health educationPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Moynihan R, Bero L, Ross-Degnan D, et al. Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medications. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1645–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Goldberg JP, Hellwig JP. Nutrition research in the media: the challenge facing scientists. J Am Coll Nutr. 1997;16:544–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 3.Molitor F. Accuracy in science news reporting by newspapers: the case of aspirin for the prevention of heart attacks. Health Commun. 1993;5:209–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Shuchman M, Wilkes MS. Medical scientists and health news reporting: a case of miscommunication. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:976–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 5.Rubin R, Rogers HL Jr. Under the microscope: the relationship between physicians and the news media Nashville, Tenn: The Freedom Forum First Amendment Center at Vanderbilt University; 1993.Google Scholar
- 6.Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Press releases: translating research into news. JAMA. 2002;287:2856–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.de Semir V, Ribas C, Revuelta G. Press releases of science journal articles and subsequent newspaper stories on the same topic. JAMA. 1998;280:294–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Brody JE. The challenges of accurate health reporting [speech]. University of Minnesota School of Public Health. Dec. 1, 2000. Available from: URL: http://www.ahcj.umn.edu/files/brodyspeech.pdf.Google Scholar
- 9.Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Baczek L. Media coverage of scientific meetings: too much, too soon? JAMA. 2002;287:2859–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Black WC, Welch HG. The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:966–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Sheridan SL, Pignone M. Numeracy and the medical student’s ability to interpret data. Eff Clin Pract. 2002;5:35–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kirsch IS, Jungeblut A, Jenkins L, Kolstad A. Adult Literacy in America. Washington, D.C.: Office of Education Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education; 1993.Google Scholar
- 13.Budescu DF, Wallsten TS. Processing linguistic probabilities: general principles and empirical evidence. In: Busemeyer JR, Hastie R, Medlin DL, eds. Decision Making from a Cognitive Perspective. New York: Academic Press; 1995:275–318.Google Scholar
- 14.Merz JF, Druzdzel MJ, Mazur DJ. Verbal expressions of probability in informed consent litigation. Med Decis Making. 1991;11:273–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Misunderstandings about the effects of race and sex on physicians’ referrals for cardiac catheterization. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:279–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Welch HG. Risk communication in clinical practice: putting cancer in context. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1999;25:124–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Lang TA, Secic M. How to report statistics in medicine: annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 1997.Google Scholar
- 18.Zhang J, Yu KF. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. JAMA. 1998;280:1690–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Davies HT, Crombie IK, Tavakoli M. When can odds ratios mislead? BMJ. 1998;316:989–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Farberman RK. What the media need from news sources. In: Schwartz LL, ed. Psychology and the Media: A Second Look, 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999: 9–23.Google Scholar
- 21.Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-Part 1. Lancet. 1996;347:1382–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review-Part 2. Lancet. 1996;347:1459–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Kassirer JP, Angell M. Prepublication release of Journal articles. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:1762–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Gross CP, Steiner CA, Bass EB, Powe NR. Relation between prepublication release of clinical trial results and the practice of carotid endarterectomy. JAMA. 2000;284:2886–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Phillips DP, Kanter EJ, Bednarczyk B, Tastad PL. Importance of the lay press in the transmission of medical knowledge to the scientific community. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1180–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Broder DS. Behind the Front Page: A Candid Look at How News Is Made. 1st Touchstone ed. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1988.Google Scholar
- 27.Jordan DL. Newspaper effects on policy preferences. Public Opin Q. 1993;57:191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Otten AL. The influence of the mass media on health policy. Health Aff (Millwood). 1992;11:111–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Kennedy GE, Bero LA. Print media coverage of research on passive smoking. Tob Control. 1999;8:254–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Warner KE. Cigarette advertising and media coverage of smoking and health. N Engl J Med. 1985;312:384–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Logan RA. Three opportunities to work with the news media. Arthritis Care Res. 1998;11:53–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Wellman NS, Scarbrough FE, Ziegler RG, Lyle B. Do we facilitate the scientific process and the development of dietary guidance when findings from single studies are publicized? An American Society for Nutritional Sciences controversy session report. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:802–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar