Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 44–52 | Cite as

Linguistic and cultural barriers to care

Perspectives of chinese and vietnamese immigrants
  • Quyen Ngo-Metzger
  • Michael P. Massagli
  • Brian R. Clarridge
  • Michael Manocchia
  • Roger B. Davis
  • Lisa I. Iezzoni
  • Russell S. Phillips
Populations At Risk


CONTEXT: Primarily because of immigration, Asian Americans are one of the fastest growing and most ethnically diverse minority groups in the United States. However, little is known about their perspectives on health care quality.

OBJECTIVE: To examine factors contributing to quality of care from the perspective of Chinese- and Vietnamese-American patients with limited English language skills.

DESIGN: Qualitative study using focus groups and content analysis to determine domains of quality of care.

SETTING: Four community health centers in Massachusetts.

PARTICIPANTS: A total of 122 Chinese- and Vietnamese-American patients were interviewed in focus groups by bilingual interviewers using a standardized, translated moderator guide.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Domains of quality of care mentioned by patients in verbatim transcripts.

RESULTS: In addition to dimensions of health care quality commonly expressed by Caucasian, English-speaking patients in the United States, Chinese- and Vietnamese-American patients with limited English proficiency wanted to discuss the use of non-Western medical practices with their providers, but encountered significant barriers. They viewed providers’ knowledge, inquiry, and nonjudgmental acceptance of traditional Asian medical beliefs and practices as part of quality care. Patients also considered the quality of interpreter services to be very important. They preferred using professional interpreters rather than family members, and preferred gender-concordant translators. Furthermore, they expressed the need for help in navigating health care systems and obtaining support services.

CONCLUSIONS: Cultural and linguistically appropriate health care services may lead to improved health care quality for Asian-American patients who have limited English language skills. Important aspects of quality include providers’ respect for traditional health beliefs and practices, access to professional interpreters, and assistance in obtaining social services.

Key words

Asian Americans Chinese Vietnamese immigrants quality health care access interpreters language barriers indigent care community health centers 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    United States Bureau of the Census. Statistical Abstracts of the United States. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1995:19.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pachter LM. Culture and clinical care: folk illness beliefs and behaviors and their implications for health care delivery. JAMA. 1994;271:690–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Morales LS, Elliott MN, Weech-Maldonado R, Spritzer KL, Hays RD. Differences in CAHPS adult survey reports and ratings by race and ethnicity: an analysis of the National CAHPS benchmarking data 1.0. Health Serv Res. 2001;36:595–617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Snyder RE, Cunningham W, Nakazono TT, Hays RD. Access to medical care reported by Asians and Pacific Islanders in a west coast physician group association. Med Care Res Rev. 2000;57:196–215.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meredith LS, Siu AL. Variation and quality of self-report health data: Asians and Pacific Islanders compared with other ethnic groups. Med Care. 1995;33:1120–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taira DA, Safran DG, Seto TB, et al. Asian-American patient ratings of physician primary care performance. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:237–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murray-Garcia JL, Selby JV, Schmittdiel J, Grumbach K, Quesenberry CP. Racial and ethnic differences in a patient survey: patients’ values, ratings, and reports regarding physician primary care performance in a large health maintenance organization. Med Care. 2000;38:300–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frayne SM, Burns RB, Hardt EJ, Rosen AK, Moskowitz MA. The exclusion of non-English-speaking persons from research. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:39–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Watanabe P, Jennings J, Melendez E, et al. A Dream Deferred: Changing Demographics, Challenges and New Opportunities for Boston. Boston, Mass: Institute for Asian American Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston; 1996.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chung RCC, Singer MK. Predictors of psychological distress among Southeast Asian refugees. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36:631–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mollica RF, McInnes K, Pham T, Fawzi MCS, Murphy E, Lin L. The dose-effect relationships between torture and psychiatric symptoms in Vietnamese ex-political detainees and a comparison group. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186:543–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Office of Refugees and Immigrant Health. Refugees and Immigrants in Massachusetts: An Overview of Selected Communities. Boston, Mass: Bureau of Family and Community Health and Massachusetts Department of Public Health; 1997.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hayes TJ, Tatham CB. Focus Group Interviews: A Reader, 2nd Ed. Chicago, Ill: American Marketing Association; 1989.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hisrich RD, Peters MP. Focus groups: an innovative marketing research technique. In: Focus Group Interviews: A Reader. 2nd Ed. Chicago, Ill: American Marketing Association; 1989:77–90.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Roberts M, et al. Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood). 1991;10:254–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, McMullen W, Delbanco TL. The relationship between reported problems and patient summary evaluations of hospital care. QRB Qual. Rev. Bull. 1992;18:53–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edgman-Levitan S, Cleary PD. What information do consumers want and need? Health Aff (Millwood). 1996;15:42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Consumer Assessment of Health Plans (CAHPS). Fact Sheet. AHRQ Publication No. 00-PO47, April 2000. Rockville, Md: Agency for Healthcare Research and Policy. Accessed August 7, 2002.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brown JA, Nederend SE, Hays RD, Short PF, Farley DO. Special issues in assessing care of Medicaid recipients. Med Care. 1999;37:MS79–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weidmer B, Brown J, Garcia L. Translating the CAHPS 1.0 survey instruments into Spanish. Med Care. 1999;37:MS89–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Glaser B, Strauss AL. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Strauss A, Corbin J. Grounded theory methodology, an overview. In: Handbook of Qualitative Research. Denzin N, Lincoln Y, eds. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1994:273–85.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trotter RT II. Folk medicine in the Southwest: myths and medical factors. Postgrad Med. 1985;78:167–79.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McPhee SJ. Caring for a 70-year-old Vietnamese woman. JAMA. 2002;287:495–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Coates WC, Pitkin K. Use and effectiveness of interpreters in an emergency department. JAMA. 1996;275:783–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weech-Maldonado R, Weidmer BO, Morales LS, Hays RD. Cross-cultural adaptation of survey instruments: the CAHPS experience. In: Cynamon M, Kulka R, eds. Seventh Conference on Health Survey Research Methods, Williamsburg, Va, September 24–27, 1999. Rockville, Md: Department of Health and Human Services; 2001:75–82.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kuo D, Fagan MJ. Satisfaction with methods of Spanish interpretation in an ambulatory care clinic. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:547–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Philipp BL, Wilson C, Kastner B, Pearson C, Bauchner H. A comparison of suburban and urban daytime telephone triage calls. Pediatrics. 2000;106:231–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ngo-Metzger Q, Massagli MP, Manocchia M, et al. Patient-centered quality measures for Asian-Americans: Research in progress. Am J Med Qual. 2000;15:167–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sorlie PD, Backlund E, Keller JB. US mortality by economic, demographic and social characteristics: the longitudinal mortality study. Am J Public Health. 1995;85:949–56.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kaplan GA, Keil JE. Socioeconomic factors and cardiovascular disease: a review of the literature. Circulation. 1993;88:1973–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Feinstein JS. The relationship between socioeconomic status and health: a review of the literature. Milbank Q. 1993;71:279–322.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Krieger N. Is breast cancer a disease of affluence, poverty, or both? The case of African American women. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:611–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Carrillo JE, Green AR, Betancourt JR. Cross-cultural primary care: a patient-based approach. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:829–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Riddick S. Improving access for limited English-speaking consumers: a review of strategies in health care settings. JHCPU. 1998;9:S40–61.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Putsch RW. Cross-cultural communication: the special case of interpreters in health care. JAMA. 1996;254:3344–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rivadeneyra R, Elderkin-Thompson V, Silver RC, Waitzkin H. Patient centeredness in medical encounters requiring an interpreter. Am J Med. 2000;108:470–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Woloshin S, Bickell NA, Schwartz LM, Gany F, Welch HG. Language barriers in medicine in the United States. JAMA. 1995;273:724–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Youdelman M, Perkins J. Providing Language Interpretation Services in Health Care Setting: Examples from the Field. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund, 2002.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Putsch RW, Joyce M. Dealing with patients from other cultures. In: Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, eds. Clinical Methods, 3rd Ed. Boston: Butterworths; 1990:1050–65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quyen Ngo-Metzger
    • 1
  • Michael P. Massagli
    • 4
  • Brian R. Clarridge
    • 2
  • Michael Manocchia
    • 3
  • Roger B. Davis
    • 1
  • Lisa I. Iezzoni
    • 1
  • Russell S. Phillips
    • 1
  1. 1.the Division of General Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBoston
  2. 2.the Center for Survey ResearchUniversity of MassachusettsBoston
  3. 3.the Department of SociologyUniversity of Rhode IslandKingston
  4. 4.Cambridge

Personalised recommendations