Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 31–37

Improving physicians’ knowledge of the costs of common medications and willingness to consider costs when prescribing

  • Lisa M. Korn
  • Steven Reichert
  • Todd Simon
  • Ethan A. Halm
Original Articles

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of an educational intervention designed to improve physicians’ knowledge of drug costs and foster willingness to consider costs when prescribing.

DESIGN: Pre- and post-intervention evaluation, using physicians as their own controls.

SETTING: Four teaching hospitals, affiliated with 2 residency programs, in New York City and northern New Jersey.

PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-six internal medicine house officers and attendings evaluated the intervention (71% response rate). Of these, 109 had also participated in a pre-intervention survey.

INTERVENTION: An interactive teaching conference and distribution of a pocket guide, which listed the average wholesale prices of over 100 medications commonly used in primary care

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We administered a written survey, before and 6 months after the intervention. Changes in attitudes and knowledge were assessed, using physicians as their own controls, with Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank tests. Eighty-five percent of respondents reported receiving the pocket guide and 46% reported attending 1 of the teaching conferences. Of those who received the pocket guide, nearly two thirds (62%) reported using it once a month or more, and more than half (54%) rated it as moderately or very useful. Compared to their baseline responses, physicians after the intervention were more likely to ask patients about their out-of-pocket drug costs (22% before vs 27% after; P<.01) and less likely to feel unaware of drug costs (78% before vs 72% after; P=.02). After the intervention, physicians also reported more concern about the cost of drugs when prescribing for patients with Medicare (58% before vs 72% after; P<.01) or no insurance (90% before vs 98% after; P<.01). Knowledge of the costs of 33 drugs was more accurate after the intervention than before (P<.05).

CONCLUSION: Our brief educational intervention led to modest improvements in physicians’ knowledge of medication costs and their willingness to consider costs when prescribing. Future research could incorporate more high-intensity strategies, such as outreach visits, and target specific prescribing behaviors.

Key words

drug costs knowledge attitudes physicians questionnaires 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Iglehart JK. Medicare and prescription drugs. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1010–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Iglehart JK. The American health care system—Expenditures. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:70–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pear R. Budget office’s estimates for drug spending grow: adding to challenge of Medicare coverage. New York Times. February 24, 2001:A7.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davis M, Poisal J, Chulis G, Zarabozo C, Cooper B. Prescription drug coverage, utilization, and spending among Medicare beneficiaries. Health Aff (Millwood). 1999;18:231–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mehl B, Santell J. Projecting future drug expenditures—2001. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001;58:125–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Soumerai SB, Ross-Degnan D. Inadequate prescription-drug coverage for Medicare enrollees—A call to action. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:722–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Etheredge L. Purchasing Medicare prescription drug benefits: a new proposal. Health Aff (Millwood). 1999;18:7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pear R. Spending on prescription drugs increases by almost 19 percent: doctors are using more of costliest medicines. New York Times. May 8, 2001:A1, A16.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reichert S, Simon T, Halm EA. Physicians’ attitudes about prescribing and knowledge of the costs of common medications. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:2799–803.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beringer GB, Biel M, Ziegler DK. Neurologists’ knowledge of medication costs. Neurology. 1984;34:121–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fowkes FG. Doctors’ knowledge of the costs of medical care. Med Educ. 1985;19:113–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Glickman L, Bruce EA, Caro FG, Avorn J. Physicians’ knowledge of drug costs for the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1994;42:992–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoffman J, Barefield FA, Ramamurthy S. A survey of physician knowledge of drug costs. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1995;10:432–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miller LG, Blum A. Physician awareness of prescription drug costs: a missing element of drug advertising and promotion. J Fam Pract. 1993;36:33–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oppenheim GL, Erickson SH, Ashworth C. The family physician’s knowledge of the cost of prescribed drugs. J Fam Pract. 1981;12:1027–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rowe J, MacVicar S. Doctors’ knowledge of the cost of common medications. J Clin Hosp Pharm. 1986;11:365–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ryan M, Yule B, Bond C, Taylor RJ. Scottish general practitioners’ attitudes and knowledge in respect of prescribing costs. BMJ. 1990;300:1316–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Walzak D, Swindells S, Bhardwaj A. Primary care physicians and the cost of drugs: a study of prescribing practices based on recognition and information sources. J Clin Pharmacol. 1994;34:1159–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Weber ML, Auger C, Cleroux R. Knowledge of medical students, pediatric residents, and pediatricians about the cost of some medications. Pediatr Pharmacol (New York). 1986;5:281–5.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Top 200 brand-name Rx drugs. In: Cardinale V, ed. 1998 Drug Topics Red Book. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Co.;1998:130.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Top 200 generic Rx drugs. In: Cardinale V, ed. 1998 Drug Topics Red Book. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Co.;1998:131.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Abramowicz M. ed. The Medical Letter: On Drugs and Therapeutics. New Rochelle, NY, Feb. 1995 – Aug. 1998.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cardinale V, ed. 1998 Drug Topics Red Book. Montvale, NJ: Medical Economics Co.;1998.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics, 5th ed. Pacific Grove, Calif: Duxbury; 2000.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Salman H, Bergmann M, Hart J, et al. The effect of drug cost on hypertension treatment decision. Public Health. 1999;113:243–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman AD, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance: a systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274:700–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001;39:II2–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Grol R. Improving the quality of medical care: building bridges among professional pride, payer profit, and patient satisfaction. JAMA. 2001;286:2578–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thomson O’Brien MA, Freemantle N, Oxman AD, Wolf F, Davis DA, et al. Continuing education meetings and workshops: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software; 2002.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    ePocrates Rx. version 4.0. Available at: http://epocrates.com. Accessed September 23, 2002.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pocket Pharmacopeia software. Available at: http://tarasonpublishing.com/store/palm.asp. Accessed September 23, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of General Internal Medicine 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa M. Korn
    • 1
  • Steven Reichert
    • 2
  • Todd Simon
    • 3
  • Ethan A. Halm
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program, Department of MedicineJohns Hopkins School of MedicineBaltimore
  2. 2.the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineEnglewood Hospital and Medical CenterEnglewood
  3. 3.the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of MedicineMount Sinai School of MedicineNew York
  4. 4.the Department of Health PolicyMount Sinai School of MedicineNew York
  5. 5.Department of Public HealthWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityNew York
  6. 6.Department of Health PolicyMount Sinai Medical CenterNew York

Personalised recommendations