Effect of a physician-directed educational campaign on performance of proper diabetic foot exams in an outpatient setting
- 65 Downloads
BACKGROUND: The established guidelines for a diabetes foot examination include assessing circulatory, skin, and neurological status to detect problems early and reduce the like-lihood of amputation. Physician adherence to the guidelines for proper examination is less than optimal.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to increase compliance with the performance of a proper foot examination through a predominantly physician-directed interventional campaign.
METHODS: The study consisted of 3 parts: a retrospective chart review to estimate background compliance, an educational intervention, and prospective chart review at 3 and 6 months. A properly documented foot examination was defined as assessing at least 2 of the 3 necessary components. The educational intervention consisted of 2 lectures directed at resident physicians and a quality assurance announcement at a general internal medicine staff meeting. Clinic support staff were instructed to remove the shoes and socks of all diabetic patients when they were placed in exam rooms, and signs remiding diabetics were placed in each exam room.
RESULTS: There was a significant increase in the performance of proper foot examination over the course of the study (baseline 14.0%, 3 months 58.0%, 6 months 62.1%; P<.001). Documentation of any component of a proper foot examination also increased substantially (32.6%, 67.3%, 72.5%; P<.001). Additionally, performance of each component of a proper exam increased dramatically during the study: neurological (13.5%, 35.8%, 38.5%; P<.001), skin (23.0%, 64.2%, 69.2%; P<.001), and vascular (14.0%, 51.2%, 50.5%; P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with diabetes are unlikely to have foot examinations in their primary medical care. A simple, lowcost educational intervention significantly improved the adherence to foot examination guidelines for patients with diabetes.
Key wordsdiabetes foot ulceration foot exam prevention physician education
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates and General Information on Diabetes in the United States. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1997.Google Scholar
- 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The Prevention and Treatment of Complications of Diabetes. A Guide for Primary Care Practitioners. Atlanta, Ga: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 1991.Google Scholar
- 4.Levin ME, O’Neal LW, Bowker JH, eds. The Diabetic Foot, 5th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1993: xxi-xxii.Google Scholar
- 5.Levin ME. Foot lesions in patients with diabetes mellitus. In: Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America, vol. 25. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders; 1996:447–62.Google Scholar
- 7.Macleod AF, Williams DRR, Sonksen PH, et al. Risk factors for foot ulceration in hospital clinic attendees. Diabetologia. 1991;34(suppl 2):A39.Google Scholar
- 8.Sathe SR. Managing the diabetic foot in developing countries. IDF Bull. 1993;38:16–8.Google Scholar
- 9.U.S. Deptartment of Health and Human Services. Diabetes Surveillance: Annual 1990 Report. Atlanta, Ga: Centers for Disease Control, Division of Diabetes Translation; 1990: 23–25, 93–95.Google Scholar
- 10.Reiber GE, Boyko EJ, Smith DG. Lower extremity foot ulcers and amputations in diabetes. In: Diabetes in America, 2nd ed. Bethesda, Md: National Institute of Health; 1995.Google Scholar
- 11.American Diabetes Association. Preventive foot care in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(Suppl 1):554–55.Google Scholar
- 15.Edmonds ME. Experience in a multi-disciplinary diabetic foot clinic. In: The Foot in Diabetics. Conor H, Boulton AJM, Ward JD. eds. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley; 1987:121–33.Google Scholar
- 16.Laing P. The development and complications of diabetic foot ulcers. Am J Surg. 1998;176(Suppl 1):115–95.Google Scholar
- 17.Prevention and Early Intervention for Diabetes Foot Problems. A Research Review. Available at http://ndep.nih.gov/materials/pubs/feet/feet2001.pdf. Accessed February, 2003.Google Scholar
- 18.American Diabetes Association. Clinical practice recommendations 2002. Diabetes Care 2002;25(Suppl 1):1–147.Google Scholar
- 20.National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. Survey of Physician Practices Related to the Treatment of People with Diabetes Mellitus. Primary Care Physicians. Rockville Md: Prospect Associates; 1990.Google Scholar
- 29.Michigan Diabetes Research and Training Center. Diabetes in Communities. Hiss RG, ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan; 1992:1–136.Google Scholar
- 32.Green LW, Krenter MW. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Environmental Approach. 2nd ed. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield Publishing Co; 1991.Google Scholar
- 34.Davidson JK, Alogna M, Goldsmith M, Borden J. Assessment of program effectiveness of Grady-Memorial Hospital-Atlanta. In: Steiner G, Lawrence PA. eds. Educating Diabetic Patients. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1981:329–48.Google Scholar