Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 29–39 | Cite as

How are patients’ specific ambulatory care experiences related to trust, satisfaction, and considering changing physicians?

  • Nancy L. KeatingEmail author
  • Diane C. Green
  • Audiey C. Kao
  • Julie A. Gazmararian
  • Vivian Y. Wu
  • Paul D. Cleary
Original Articles


CONTEXT: Few data are available regarding the consequences of patients’ problems with interpersonal aspects of medical care.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships between outpatient problem experiences and patients’ trust in their physicians, ratings of their physicians, and consideration of changing physicians. We classified as problem experiences patients’ reports that their physician does not always 1) give them enough time to explain the reason for the visit, 2) give answers to questions that are understandable, 3) take enough time to answer questions, 4) ask about how their family or living situation affects their health, 5) give as much medical information as they want, or 6) involve them in decisions as much as they want.

DESIGN: Telephone survey during 1997.

PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=2,052; 58% response) insured by a large national health insurer.

MEASUREMENTS: Patient trust, overall ratings of physicians, and having considered changing physicians.

RESULTS: Most patients (78%) reported at least 1 problem experience. In multivariable analyses, each problem experience was independently associated with lower trust (all P<.001) and 5 of 6 with lower overall ratings (P<.001). Three problem experiences were independently related to considering changing physicians: physicians not always giving answers to questions that are understandable (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.0), not always taking enough time to answer questions (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.2 to 5.2), and not always giving enough medical information (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 2.4 to 6.6).

CONCLUSIONS: Problem experiences in the ambulatory setting are strongly related to lower trust. Several are also associated with lower overall ratings and with considering changing physicians, particularly problems related to communication of health information. Efforts to improve patients’ experiences may promote more trusting relationships and greater continuity and therefore should be a priority for physicians, educators, and health care organizations.

Key words

ambulatory care trust patient satisfaction communication patient-physician relationship 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Ware JE. Expanding patient involvement in care. Effects on patient outcomes. Ann Intern Med. 1985;102:520–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Ware JE. Assessing the effects of physician-patient interactions on the outcomes of chronic disease [published erratum appears in Med Care 1989 July 27:679]. Med Care. 1989;27(3 suppl):110–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lerman CE, Brody DS, Caputo GC, Smith DG, Lazaro CG, Wolfson HG. Patients’ Perceived Involvement in Care Scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1990;5:29–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Levinson W, Roter D. The effects of two continuing medical education programs on communication skills of practicing primary care physicians. J Gen Intern Med. 1993;8:318–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stewart MA. Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;152:1423–33.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roter DL, Hall JA, Kern DE, Barker LR, Cole KA, Roca RP. Improving physicians’ interviewing skills and reducing patients’ emotional distress. A randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:1877–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Putnam SM, Lipkin M. The patient-centered interview: research support. In: Lipkin M, Putnam SM, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview—Clinical Care, Education, and Research. New York, NY: Springer; 1995:530–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaplan SH, Greenfield S, Gandek B, Rogers WH, Ware JE. Characteristics of physicians with participatory decision-making styles. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:497–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goold SD, Lipkin M. The doctor-patient relationship. Challenges, opportunities, and strategies. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:26S-33S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clark W, Lipkin M, Graman H, Shorey J. Improving physicians’ relationships with patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:45S-50S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cooper-Patrick L, Gallo JJ, Gonzales JJ, et al. Race, gender, and partnership in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282:583–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Levinson W, Gorawara-Bhat R, Dueck R, et al. Resolving disagreements in the patient-physician relationship: tools for improving communication in managed care. JAMA. 1999;282:1477–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thom DH, Ribisl KM, Stewart AL, Luke DA. The Stanford Trust Study Physicians. Further validation and reliability testing of the Trust in Physician Scale. Med Care. 1999;37:510–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gabel LL, Lucas JB, Westbury RC. Why do patients continue to see the same physicians? Fam Pract Res J. 1993;13:133–47.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cleary PD. The increasing importance of patient surveys. BMJ. 1999;319:720–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Roberts M, et al. Patients evaluate their hospital care: a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood). 1991;10:254–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, Walker JD, Gerteis M, Delbanco TL. Using patient reports to improve medical care: a preliminary report from 10 hospitals. Qual Manag Health Care. 1993;Fall:31–8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kao AC, Green DC, Zaslavsky AM, Koplan JP, Cleary PD. The relationship between method of physician payment and patient trust. JAMA. 1998;280:1708–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S, McMullen W, Delbanco TL. The relationship between reported problems and patient summary evaluations of hospital care. Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:53–9.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Edgman-Levitan S, Cleary PD. What information do consumers want and need? Health Aff (Millwood). 1996;15:42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Anderson LA, Dedrick RF. Development of the Trust in Physician scale: a measure to assess interpersonal trust in patient-physician relationships. Psychol Rep. 1990;67:1091–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Janoff-Bulman R. Assumptive worlds and the stress of traumatic events: applications of the schema construct. Soc Cogn. 1993;7:113–36.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium in Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 1967:221–33.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Localio AR, Berlin JA, Ten Have TR, Kimmel SE. Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview. Ann Intern Med. 2001;135:112–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cleary PD, Edgman-Levitan S. Health care quality. Incorporating consumer perspectives. JAMA. 1997;278:1608–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hall JA, Roter DL, Katz NR. Meta-analysis of correlates of provider behavior in medical encounters. Med Care. 1988;26:657–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Krupat E, Fancey M, Cleary PD. Information and its impact on satisfaction among surgical patients. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1817–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Robbins JA, Bertakis KD, Helms LJ, Azari R, Callahan EJ, Creten DA. The influence of physician practice behaviors on patient satisfaction. Fam Med. 1993;25:17–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Waitzkin H. Doctor-patient communication. Clinical implications of social scientific research. JAMA. 1984;252:2441–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis CE, et al. Important elements of outpatient care: a comparison of patients’ and physicians’ opinions. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:640–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Beckman HB, Frankel RM. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:692–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281:283–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rosenthal GE, Shannon SE. The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems. Med Care. 1997;35:NS58–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Behav Med. 1998;24:81–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Deber RB, Kraetschmer N, Irvine J. What role do patients wish to play in treatment decision making? Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1414–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Arora NK, McHorney CA. Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate? Med Care. 2000;38:335–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, et al. Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum. What patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA. 1999;282:261–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kerr EA, Hays RD, Lee ML, Siu AL. Does dissatisfaction with access to specialists affect the desire to leave a managed care plan? Med Care Res Rev. 1998;55:59–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith RC, Lyles JS, Mettler J, et al. The effectiveness of intensive training for residents in interviewing. A randomized, controlled study. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:118–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Science Inc 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nancy L. Keating
    • 1
    • 4
    Email author
  • Diane C. Green
    • 2
  • Audiey C. Kao
    • 3
  • Julie A. Gazmararian
    • 2
  • Vivian Y. Wu
    • 4
  • Paul D. Cleary
    • 4
  1. 1.the Division of General Internal Medicine, (Section on Health Services and Policy Research), Department of MedicineBrigham and Women’s HospitalBoston
  2. 2.the Emory Center on Health Outcomes and QualityAtlanta
  3. 3.the Institute for Ethics, American Medical AssociationChicago
  4. 4.Department of Health Care PolicyHarvard Medical SchoolBoston

Personalised recommendations