Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 315–319 | Cite as

“Serious and complex illness” in quality improvement and policy reform for end-of-life care

Health Policy

Abstract

Americans are living longer — a mark of success in public health and medical care — but more will live the last few years with progressive illness and disability. The dominant conception of care delivery separates “aggressive” or life-extending care from “palliative” or death-accepting care, with an assumed “transition” between them. The physiology and the experience of this population are mismatched in this model. Here, we propose a more useful category for public policy and clinical quality improvement: persons who will die as a result of “serious and complex illness.” Delivery system changes could ensure reliable, continuous, and competent care to this population.

Key Words

health policy serious and complex illness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Institute of Medicine. Field, MJ & Cassel, CK, eds. Approaching Death: Improving Care at the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Patient’s Bill of Rights Act of 1998: A Health Insurance Bill of Rights (S.2529).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Presidential Memorandum Regarding Federal Agency Compliance with the Patient’s Bill of Rights. February 20, 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chrvala CA, Sharfstein S, eds. Definition of Serious and Complex Medical Conditions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lynn J. Potentially ineffective care in intensive care [letter]. JAMA. 1998;279:652.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fox E, Landrum-McNiff K, Zhong Z, Dawson NV, Wu AW, Lynn J. Evaluation of prognostic criteria for determining hospice eligibility in patients with advanced lung, heart or liver disease. SUPPORT Investigators Study to Understand Prognosis and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. JAMA. 1999;282:1638–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hammes BJ, Rooney BL. Death and end-of-life planning in one Midwestern community. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:383–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lynn J, Harrell F, Cohn F, Wagner D, Connors AF Jr. Prognoses of seriously ill hospitalized patients on the days before death: implications for patient care and public policy. New Horiz. 1997;5:56–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rich MW. Heart failure disease management: a critical review. J Cardiac Fail. 1999;5:64–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lynn J, Teno JM, Harrell FE. Accurate prognostications of death. Opportunities and challenges for clinicians. West J Med. 1995; 63:250–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Memorandum to National Hospice Organization State and Provider Organizations by then-President Jay Mahoney. OIG Final Report: Hospice Patients in Nursing Homes. September 25, 1997.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lynn J. Measuring quality of care at the end-of-life: a statement of principles. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997;45:526–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Foundation for Accountability (FACCT). A Consumer Voice on Health Care Quality. Portland, Or: FACCT; 1996.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Selected Medicare Issues. Washington, DC; MedPAC: 1999.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iezzoni LI, Ayanian JZ, Bates DW, Burstin HR. Sounding Board: Paying more fairly for Medicare capitated care. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:1933–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lubitz JD, Riley GF. Trends in Medicare payments in the last year of life. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1092–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lamers WM. Hospice: enhancing the quality of life. Oncology. 1990;4:121–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kane RL. PACE: a model of integrated acute and long-term care. Hosp Pract (Off Ed). 1997;32:23–4, 27, 30.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Berwick D. Quality comes home. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:839–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Available at The National Institutes of Health Office of Extramural Research home page at: http://www.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-NR-99-004.html.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lynn J, Schuster JL. Improving Care for the End-of-Life: A Sourcebook for Health Care Managers and Clinicians. New York, NY; Oxford University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the Congress: Context for a Changing Medicare Program. Washington, DC; MedPAC: 1998.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Available at The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation home page at: http://rwjf.org/main.html.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Available at the Project on Death in America home page at: http://www.soros.org/death/@pdia.htm.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Available at the home page for the American Medical Association Education for Physicians about End-of-Life Care (EPEC) Project at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ethic/epec/index.htm.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lo B, Snyder L, Sox HC. Care at the End of Life: guiding practice where there are no easy answers. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:772–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lynn J, Schall MW, Milne C, Nolan KM, Kabcenell A. Quality improvements in end-of-life care: insights from two collaboratives. Joint Comm J Qual Improv. 2000;26:254–67.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Battin MP. Euthanasia: the way we do it, the way they do it. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1991;6:298–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Science Inc 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.From the RAND Center to Improve Care of the DyingArlington
  2. 2.Senate Special Committee on Aging Minority OfficeWashington, DC

Personalised recommendations