Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 16, Issue 9, pp 620–624 | Cite as

Teaching the one-minute preceptor

A randomized controlled trial
  • Scott L. Furney
  • Alex N. Orsini
  • Kym E. Orsetti
  • David T. Stern
  • Larry D. Gruppen
  • David M. Irby
Original Articles


OBJECTIVE: The One-Minute Preceptor (OMP) model of faculty development is used widely to improve teaching, but its effect on teaching behavior has not been assessed. We aim to evaluate the effect of this intervention on residents’ teaching skills.

DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING: Inpatient teaching services at both a tertiary care hospital and a Veterans Administration Medical Center affiliated with a University Medical Center.

PARTICIPANTS: Participants included 57 second- and third-year internal medicine residents that were randomized to the intervention group (n=28) or to the control group (n=29).

INTERVENTION: The intervention was a 1-hour session incorporating lecture, group discussion, and role-play.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcome measures were resident self-report and learner ratings of resident performance of the OMP teaching behaviors. Residents assigned to the intervention group reported statistically significant changes in all behaviors (P<.05). Eighty-seven percent of residents rated the intervention as “useful or very useful” on a 1–5 point scale with a mean of 4.28. Student ratings of teacher performance showed improvements in all skills except “Teaching General Rules.” Learners of the residents in the intervention group reported increased motivation to do outside reading when compared to learners of the control residents. Ratings of overall teaching effectiveness were not significantly different between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS: The OMP model is a brief and easy-to-administer intervention that provides modest improvements in residents’ teaching skills.

Key words

medical education internship and residency educational models feedback 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Wilkerson L, Lesky L, Medio F. The resident as teacher during work rounds. J Med Educ. 1986;61:823–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tonesk X. The house officer as a teacher: what schools expect and measure. J Med Educ. 1979;54:613–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jewett LS, Greenberg LW, Goldberg RM. Teaching residents how to teach: a one-year study. J Med Educ. 1982;57:361–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wilkerson L, Irby DM. Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med. 1998;73:387–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Spickard A, Corbett EC, Schorling JB. Improving residents’ teaching skills and attitudes toward teaching. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:475–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Neher JO, Gordon KC, Meyer B, Stevens N. A five-step “microskills” model of clinical teaching. Clin Teach. 1992;5:419–24.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Litzelman D, Stratos G, Marriot D, Skeff K. Factorial validation of a widely disseminated educational framework for evaluating clinical teachers. Acad Med. 1998;73:688–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huber PJ. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1967;1:221–33.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Irby D. How attending physicians make instructional decisions when conducting teaching rounds. Acad Med. 1992;67:630–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Irby D. What clinical teachers in medicine need to know. Acad Med. 1994;69:333–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Irby D, Rakestraw P. Evaluating clinical teaching in medicine. J Med Educ. 1981;56:181–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. JAMA. 1983;250:777–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hewson M, Little M. Giving feedback in medical education: verification of recommended techniques. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:111–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skeff K. Evaluation of a method for improving the teaching performance of attending physicians. Am J Med. 1983;75:465–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Science Inc 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scott L. Furney
    • 1
  • Alex N. Orsini
    • 1
  • Kym E. Orsetti
    • 1
  • David T. Stern
    • 1
    • 3
  • Larry D. Gruppen
    • 2
  • David M. Irby
    • 4
  1. 1.the Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Michigan Health SystemAnn Arbor
  2. 2.the Department of Medical EducationUniversity of Michigan Health SystemAnn Arbor
  3. 3.the Ann Arbor VA Medical CenterAnn Arbor
  4. 4.the University of CaliforniaSan Francisco

Personalised recommendations