Advertisement

Journal of General Internal Medicine

, Volume 16, Issue 8, pp 507–518 | Cite as

Adverse cardiac events after surgery

Assessing risk in a veteran population
  • Raminder KumarEmail author
  • W. Paul McKinney
  • Guna Raj
  • Gustavo R. Heudebert
  • Howard J. Heller
  • Mary Koetting
  • Donald D. McIntire
Original Articles

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish rates of and risk factors for cardiac complications after noncardiac surgery in veterans.

DESIGN: Prospective cohort study.

SETTING: A large urban veterans affairs hospital.

PARTICIPANTS: One thousand patients with known or suspected cardiac problems undergoing 1,121 noncardiac procedures.

MEASUREMENTS: Patients were assessed preoperatively for important clinical variables. Postoperative evaluation was done by an assessor blinded to preoperative status with a daily physical examination, electrocardiogram, and creatine kinase with MB fraction until postoperative day 6, day of discharge, death, or reoperation (whichever occurred earliest). Serial electrocardiograms, enzymes, and chest radiographs were obtained as indicated. Severe cardiac complications included cardiac death, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, ventricular tachycardia, and fibrillation and pulmonary edema. Serious cardiac complications included the above, heart failure, and unstable angina.

MAIN RESULTS: Severe and serious complications were seen in 24% and 32% of aortic, 8.3% and 10% of carotid, 11.8% and 14.7% of peripheral vascular, 9.0% and 13.1% of intraabdominal/intrathoracic, 2.9% and 3.3% of intermediate-risk (head and neck and major orthopedic procedures), and 0.27% and 1.1% of low-risk procedures respectively. The five associated patient-specific risk factors identified by logistic regression are: myocardial infarction <6 months (odds ratio [OR], 4.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9 to 12.9), emergency surgery (OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 5.6), myocardial infarction >6 months (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.5), heart failure ever (OR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.0), and rhythm other than sinus (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 0.9 to 3.2). Inclusion of the planned operative procedure significantly improves the predictive ability of our risk model.

CONCLUSIONS: Five patient-specific risk factors are associated with high risk for cardiac complications in the perioperative period of noncardiac surgery in veterans. Inclusion of the operative procedure significantly improves the predictive ability of the risk model. Overall cardiac complication rates (pretest probabilities) are established for these patients. A simple nomogram is presented for calculation of post-test probabilities by incorporating the operative procedure.

Key words

cardiac risk noncardiac surgery risk index risk factors heart disease 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Goldman L, Caldera DL, Nussbaum SR, et al. Multifactorial index of cardiac risk in noncardiac surgical procedures. N Engl J Med. 1977;297:845–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeffrey CC, Kunsman J, Cullen DJ, Brewster DC. A prospective evaluation of cardiac risk index. Anesthesiology. 1983;58:462–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Detsky AS, Abrams HB, McLaughlin JR, et al. Predicting cardiac complication in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. J Gen Intern Med. 1986;1:211–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mangano DT, Browner WS, Hollenberg M, London MJ, Tubau JF, Tateo MS. Association of perioperative myocardial ischemia with cardiac morbidity and mortality in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 1990;323:1781–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ashton CM, Peterson NJ, Wray NP, et al. The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction in men undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:504–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skinner JF, Pearce ML. Surgical risk in the cardiac patient. J Chronic Dis. 1964;17:57–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooperman M, Pflug B, Martin EW Jr, Evans WE. Cardiovascular risk factors in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Surgery. 1978;84:505–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steen PA, Tinker JH, Tarhan S. Myocardial reinfarction after anesthesia and surgery. JAMA. 1978;239:2566–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larsen SF, Olesen KH, Jacobsen E, et al. Prediction of cardiac risk in non-cardiac surgery. Eur Heart J. 1987;8:179–85.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Foster ED, Davis KB, Carpenter JA, Abele S, Fray D. Risk of noncardiac operation in patients with defined coronary disease: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) registry experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 1986;4:42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eagle KA, Coley CM, Newell JB, et al. Combining clinical and thallium data optimizes preoperative assessment of cardiac risk before major vascular surgery. Ann Intern Med. 1989;110:859–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shah KB, Kleinman BS, Rao TLK, Jacobs HK, Mestan K, Schaafsma M. Angina and other risk factors in patients with cardiac diseases undergoing noncardiac operations. Anesth Analg. 1990;70:240–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999;100:1043–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons; 1989.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Harrell FE, Habbema JD. Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets. Stat Med. 2000;19:1059–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sauerbrei W, Schumacher M. A bootstrap resampling procedure for model building: application to the cox regression model. Stat Med. 1992;11:2093–109.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gong G. Cross-validation, the jackknife and the bootstrap: excess error estimation in forward logistic regression. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81:108–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Efron B, Tibshirani R. Bootstrap methods for standard errors, confidence intervals, and other measures of statistical accuracy. Stat Sci. 1986;1:54–77.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology. 1983;148:839–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    No authors listed. Interpretation of diagnostic data: 5. How to do it with simple maths. Can Med Assoc J. 1983;129: 947–54.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1959;22:719–48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kramer CY. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics. 1956;12:307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tarhan S, Moffit EA, Taylor WF, Giuliani ER. Myocardial infarction after general anesthesia. JAMA. 1972;220:1451–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Backer CL, Tinker JH, Robertson DM, Vlietstra RE. Myocardial reinfarction following local anesthesia for ophthalmic surgery. Anesth Analg. 1980;59:257–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Warner MA, Shields SE, Chute CG. Major morbidity and mortality within 1 month of ambulatory surgery and anesthesia. JAMA. 1993;270:1437–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fleisher LA, Eagle KA, Shaffer T, Anderson GF. Perioperative and long term mortality rates after major vascular surgery: the relationship to preoperative testing in Medicare population. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:849–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hertzer NR. Fatal myocardial infarction following abdominal aortic aneurysm resection: three hundred and forty-three patients followed 6–11 years postoperatively. Ann Surg. 1980;192:667–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Eagle KA, Brundage BH, Chaitman BR, et al. Guidelines for perioperative evaluation for noncardiac surgery. Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;27:910–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mair J, Morandell D, Genser N, Lechleitner P, Dienstl F, Puschendorf B. Equivalent early sensitivities of myoglobin, creatine kinase MB mass, creatine kinase isoform ratios, and cardiac troponins I and T for acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem. 1995;41:1266–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Adams JE, Sicard GA, Allen BT, et al. Diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction with measurement of cardiac troponin I. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:670–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lachenbruch P. Some misuses of discriminant analysis. Methods Inf Med. 1977;16:255–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Harrel F, Lee K, Mark D. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med. 1996;15:361–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Poldermans D, Boersma E, Bax JJ, et al. The effect of Bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1789–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gilbert K, Larocque BJ, Patrick LT. Prospective evaluation of cardiac risk indices for patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2000;133:356–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Blackwell Science Inc 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raminder Kumar
    • 1
    Email author
  • W. Paul McKinney
    • 1
  • Guna Raj
    • 1
  • Gustavo R. Heudebert
    • 1
  • Howard J. Heller
    • 1
  • Mary Koetting
    • 1
  • Donald D. McIntire
    • 2
  1. 1.Received from the Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical CenterU.T. Southwestern Medical SchoolDallas
  2. 2.Academic Computing ServicesU.T. Southwestern Medical SchoolDallas

Personalised recommendations