Effect of computer support on younger women with breast cancer
- 24 Downloads
OBJECTIVE: Assess impact of a computer-based patient support system on quality of life in younger women with breast cancer, with particular emphasis on assisting the underserved.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted between 1995 and 1998.
SETTING: Five sites: two teaching hospitals (Madison, Wis, and Chicago, Ill), two nonteaching hospitals (Chicago, Ill), and a cancer resource center (Indianapolis, Ind). The latter three sites treat many underserved patients.
PARTICIPANTS: Newly diagnosed breast cancer patients (N=246) under age 60.
INTERVENTIONS: Experimental group received Comprehensive Health Enhancement Support System (CHESS), a home-based computer system providing information, decision-making, and emotional support.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Pretest and two posttest surveys (at two- and five-month follow-up) measured aspects of participation in care, social/information support, and quality of life. At two-month follow-up, the CHESS group was significantly more competent at seeking information, more comfortable participating in care, and had greater confidence in doctor(s). At five-month follow-up, the CHESS group had significantly better social support and also greater information competence. In addition, experimental assignment interacted with several indicators of medical underservice (race, education, and lack of insurance), such that CHESS benefits were greater for the disadvantaged than the advantaged group.
CONCLUSIONS: Computer-based patient support systems such as CHESS may benefit patients by providing information and social support, and increasing their participation in health care. These benefits may be largest for currently underserved populations.
Key Wordsbreast cancer quality of life patient participation computer patient education disadvantaged Digital Divide
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 8.Health Services Research Group. Development of the Index of Medical Underservice. Health Services Research. Summer, 1975, 168–80.Google Scholar
- 17.Pingree S, Hawkins RP, Gustafson D, et al. Will the disadvantaged ride the information highway? Hopeful answers from a computer-based health crisis system. J Broadcasting Electronic Media. 1996;40(3):331–53.Google Scholar
- 19.McTavish FM, Gustafson DH, Owens BH, et al. CHESS: an interactive computer system for women with breast cancer piloted with an under-served population. In: Ozbolt JG, ed. Transforming Information, Changing Health Care; Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Symposium on Computer Applications in Medical Care. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus; 1994.Google Scholar
- 20.Gustafson DH, Taylor JO, Thompson S, Chesney P. Assessing the needs of breast cancer patients and their families. Qual Manage Healthcare. 1993;2(1):6–17.Google Scholar
- 21.Love S, Lindsey K. Dr. Susan Love’s Breast Book. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company; 1995.Google Scholar
- 22.Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH. The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer. In: Macleod CM, ed. Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents. New York: Columbia University Press; 1949:199–205.Google Scholar
- 24.Darlington RB. Regression and Linear Models. New York: McGraw Hill; 1990:263–6.Google Scholar
- 25.Ende-Murphy K. The relationship of self-directed learning, self-efficacy, and health value in young women with cancer using a computer health education program. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin; 1996. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis.Google Scholar
- 26.Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, et al. Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol 1997:974–86.Google Scholar
- 31.Hardy MA. Regression with Dummy Variables. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications Inc; 1993; Sage University Paper Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-093.Google Scholar
- 32.Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1983.Google Scholar
- 34.Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat. 1979;6:65–70.Google Scholar
- 35.Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1988.Google Scholar
- 38.U.S. Bureau of the Census. United States Population Estimates by Age, Sex, Race and Hispanic Origin, 1990–1997. Washington, DC: Population Division, U.S. Bureau of the Census; 1998:20233.Google Scholar
- 39.Gustafson D, McTavish F, Hawkins R, et al. Computer support for elderly women with breast cancer: results of a population-based intervention. (Letter) JAMA. 1998;280(15).Google Scholar
- 40.CommerceNet/Nielsen. Electronic commerce on the rise according to CommerceNet /Nielsen Media Research Survey. Jan. 7, 1998; http://www.commerce.net/news/press/121 197.html.Google Scholar